Renner Racks up The Peoria Journal Star Endorsement

Ouch.

Woodford County GOP Chairman Jim Booth says he hasn’t met the man. Neither have we.

You’d think he’d get a starring role in the (valid) critiques about downstate Dems being Chicago based after this:

His whereabouts are a legitimate campaign issue for a couple of reasons. Since his engagement to a Guatemalan lawmaker, a former dictator’s daughter, Weller has sold his home in the district and bought a condominium near downtown Chicago. He also owns property in Nicaragua. His rental of an apartment above a garage in Morris meets the legal definition of residency but not the moral commitment.

Rios Montt’s daughter isn’t just a family member, but a trusted political lieutenant. Her support of her father would be one thing if it was some sort of denial about what he is about, but she is an active member of the party and key ally to her father. She is a part of the political machine that has tried to return a murderous dictator to power. That is highly relevant.

Tari has some momentum. Make sure if you are in the 11th to help with the ground game.

Cegelis Complaint

Christine Cegelis’ campaign will be lodging a complaint with the State Board of Elections later this morning. The Complaint is available here.

Dan Johnson-Weinberger is the election lawyer in this case.

They are reasonably asking for state review and further investigation. The complaint doesn’t allege any conspiracy theory, though individual action by employees of the Board is not excluded from consideration.

Rockford Register Star

Endorses Kerry

The president does not seem to learn from experience. He has shown himself to be a man who cannot admit error, and, therefore, cannot change course even in the face of disaster. He will not listen to advice he doesn’t want to hear, and he will not absorb facts that lead logically to conclusions he doesn’t want to acknowledge.

Incredibly, he still insists that the war in Iraq is going well. He vows to persevere on the same disastrous track. He will not concede that his rationale for going to war was mistaken, despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary. Instead, he keeps shifting the rationale to justify the war.

HE WILL NOT HOLD people accountable for a poorly planned occupation and poorly managed war. The troops — too few in number from the beginning — were not properly equipped for the mission. The situation grows more perilous and the death toll of American soldiers rises almost daily.

Now This is a Surpise

I didn’t expect the Sun-Times to endorse Kerry. But they did.

The president’s handling of the past year in Iraq — his dismissal of those who warned him about the difficulty of reorganizing the country, his neglect of deep problems that are costing American lives there — made us doubt his ability to bring our involvement there to a successful conclusion. And we became concerned by the secrecy of his subordinates such as Dick Cheney and John Ashcroft, coupled with an unnecessary disregard for some of our most cherished civil liberties.

If only their were More Chapmans

Chapman is in full riff why he’ll vote for Kerry

At the age of 50, I get few chances to try something entirely new. Come Nov. 2, I plan to take one of those rare opportunities. I’m going to vote for a Democrat for president.

I’ve never done it before, and I hope I never have to do it again. But President Bush has made an irresistible case against his own re-election. His first term has been one of the most dismal and costly failures of any presidency. His second promises to be even worse.

Funny enough–I had no idea Chapman is pro-life. Maybe I missed it, but his columns are pretty tight so all of his views don’t come out–and I’ve been reading him for 16 years probably.

I’ll take it

Kerry, it’s true, is worse than Bush on some issues. But he can probably pass a test that Bush has failed, namely, avoiding catastrophe.His presidency would also restore something valuable: divided government. Unlike Bush, Kerry would face a Congress dominated by the opposition party. As Cato Institute Executive Vice President David Boaz puts it, “Republicans wouldn’t give Kerry every bad thing he wants, and they do give Bush every bad thing he wants.”

Bad things have been the hallmark of the Bush presidency, from either a conservative or a liberal perspective. On Nov. 2, we can let him expand the grave damage he has done to the national interest–or we can hold him accountable. I’ll vote for John Kerry without high hopes or enthusiasm, but vote for him I will.

no one could have reasonably predicted some of Keyes? rhetorical missteps

If, by no one, you mean no one who has Google or knows how to use the search engine at the Keyes Renew America site. The dude isn’t just prone to saying crazy things, he’s proud that he does it and posts it.

One could easily look up Jake Weisberg’s articles on the 2000 Republican Presidential debates, or Jake Tapper’s piece when Keyes exploded after the press. One could have called Mike Murphy, a GOP strategist who points out that he was a loon in 1996.

Alan Keyes has been a longstanding joke in political circles for years, the problem is that the insulated clowns at the Leader and those in ultra-religious right circles never bother to check what is going on in the rest of the world. Keyes has made a career out of being a loud, obnoxious twit who stakes out the right wing of the right wing. Then, when he fails, he blames it on the press in fits or says that people are racists who don’t like him.

What has occurred wasn’t just predictable, I predicted it. Start at August 2nd and you’ll notice that this is occurring exactly as I expected.

Now, the Leader has good reason to protect itself–Dan Proft, Leader Publisher, and a guy close to 2006 Gubernatorial Candidate to be Patrick O’Malley, was a key force behind the Keyes disaster. Closely followed by the ever obtuse State Senator Syverson and a guy I used to respect, Steve Rauschenberger. They all drank the kool aid and cynically thought a ‘real’ conservative could take this race on and tarnish Obama if nothing else (Austin Mayor is correct on this). With a little help from Jack Roeser the plan got set in motion even as moderates tried to stop it when they realized these nutjobs were serious about Keyes.

The lameness of that editorial is just amazing putting it into the context that the Leader expects the moderates to work for Keyes, when Keyes won’t work for any candidates who are pro-choice. Now, no one who is pro-choice, or sane, wants Alan Keyes stumping for them, but the hypocrisy is stunning.

Cross is running one of the most open caucuses Illinois has seen in a while. Blaming him for some sort of litmus test would be, no, check that, is assanine.