Administrative

First, new advertiser–another Blog entitled Rain Storm–take a look, they focus on neo-con misadventures–from what I saw yesterday, it looks promising.

Second, don’t forget to give Obama a little love to the right!

Third, sorry I wasn’t around yesterday, but allergy season hit here in St. Louis.

Weekend Open Thread

After the last one and one-half weeks, I need the weekend off so I’m out of here.

For those here over the weekend talk amongst yourselves, but play nicely. Next week, with the campaign back to normal levels I’ll cover the Rosemont Casino debacle and the budget. In addition, as some have already started to do in comments, we’ll be talking about the positions Obama and Ryan have taken. I’m especially befuddled by a few Ryan has taken (duh-I’m a Democrat).

The Administration’s Commitment to Democracy Shines Through Again

Largely because everyone is ignoring Latin America, I haven’t had much to say, but it is a place that has a special place in my heart. I don’t have much to say about Haiti because while I am not comfortable with how Aristide was overthrown, I have little faith in Aristide himself.

However, the retrograde jackasses from the Reagan administration are inserting themselves into the El Salvadoran elections.

During past Salvadoran elections the U.S. has maintained a hands-off policy. The American ambassador has said the U.S. will respect the electoral process again this time and work with whoever is elected. That’s a wise policy. It is not, apparently, a policy shared by everyone in the Bush administration.

Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega was quoted by Salvadoran media as warning voters to think twice about their choices and the possible impact of an FMLN victory on relations with the U.S. During a recent visit, Noriega met with almost all of the candidates, but snubbed the FMLN’s.

More troubling were White House Special Assistant Otto Reich’s remarks last week that the “U.S. could not have the same confidence in an El Salvador led by a person who is an obvious admirer of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez.” He also mused about the impact on commerce and migration policy if the FMLN were to win.

Reich’s analysis may be correct, but the decision to voice those thoughts just a few days before the election undercuts the U.S. ambassador’s pledge of neutrality. It sounded more like a warning to vote “the right way.”

Reich is uncommitted to democracy and for those that wonder why I don’t take the administration’s word for it when the neo-cons start spouting claims about democracy, you can look to him and Noriega.

I have little use for the FMLN either, but they aren’t the ones trying to subvert Democracy in this case.

Eric Zorn: Our Press Agent

For all of the bloggers popping up covering Illinois Politics, our ambassador to the regular world is Eric Zorn who appeared on WBEZ’s 848 last Friday. He gave Polis, Oneman, me, and others some great press which is very much appreciated. While I don’t mention it often, 848 is one of the better news sources for political junkies taking political reporters from around the state and getting them to chat about the news of the day.

One minor thing about Eric’s discussion–I was blogging the 2002 General Election so this is my second big election. But his point is correct that overall this is the first major Illinois election with significant blogger attention.

Of course, my projections for that one were nearly as bad as this one.

My Hobby-Horse: Disclosure

The Trib has a great article detailing the issues Blair Hull faced in the primary. My argument about potential scandals or any information that may be detrimental is release it about two weeks after the formal announcement. Get the story on the radar of the news media, address it, and move on. If you wait it will kill you later. In Hull’s case it took him off message and killed the good momentum he had–ceding it to a very charismatic candidate (who I happened to favor). Like all news stories, I think the insiders would say it was more complicated, but the big issues are covered well.

But politicians running for high offices are kidding themselves if they think that a negative information will not come out. Sometimes that fact is unfair, most of the time given the past abuses by candidates, the voters should be able to judge someone in their entirety. That said, the problem of not controlling the release means that a candidate is judged on their worst days and not on their life as a whole often. Releasing on the candidate’s timetable allows he or she to put it into the context of their life. Allowing the press to do it gives them juiciness and makes them salivate at eating you alive.

I’ll note this is the first sympathetic article in the last month for Hull–after he lost.

The Reverse Poshard

Rich Miller covers some of the patterns that emerged on Tuesday:

Barack Obama’s victory looks a lot like Glenn Poshard’s 1998 gubernatorial primary win, only upside down.

Poshard won a bunch of small southern Illinois counties with 70, 80, 90, even 95 percent. Obama did the same on Tuesday, only he won a bunch of population-rich Chicagoland townships, wards and counties with Elvis-like margins.

I’ve already told you that Obama took 61 percent in suburban Cook County, but look at some of these township numbers. Obama hit 87 percent in Oak Park Township, scoring 10,315 votes to Dan Hynes’ 616. Yes, you read that right.

What Is Daley’s Play?

In comments is the conversation I tried to spur in asking about Daley’s defense of Jack Ryan.

There are two schools of thoughts about what Daley is thinking.

1. John Kass and Rich Miller argue that Daley wants to send the surprisingly popular Obama to D.C. to get him out of the way and keep him from being a threat locally. You can’t run for Mayor from D.C.

2. Joshua in comments and others in private conversations are suggesting that Daley was signalling to white ethnics (etnics to youse natives) that they were free to defect to Ryan. The thinking is that Da Mare for Life is paranoid and wants to sink any possible challenge to his rule. He has coopted everyone he can (see faith based initiatives to African-American churches—also good practices in many ways, but lets face it–political pork) and anyone who might make inroads is a threat so they must be destroyed.

The rebuttal to 2 is that Obama would be far away. The rebuttal to the rebuttal is that may make logical sense, but Da Mare is a paranoid man.

Daley has to be somewhat subtle here because an outright destruction of Obama if he does see him as a threat would incur the wrath of a many African-Americans he has assiduously courted over the years. But there is more than one way to skin a cat.

Discuss.

More Info On Jeff Smith Chicago Event

I promise this will not become a site on Missouri politics or Jeff’s campaign blog, but I did want to pass along this invite to his Chicago event. If you want more details on Jeff, visit this earlier post.

Jeff Riley and Pete D’Alessandro for a

Spring Wine Tasting & Meet the Candidate Night

Featuring:
Jeff Smith
Candidate for Congress in Missouri

Jeff Smith is running for the vacant congressional seat formerly held by Dick Gephardt. He has raised over $100,000 and has changed the dynamics of the race with his fresh ideas and perspective. He’s also a good friend and we hope you can support him and attend this exciting event.

Saturday, March 27th, 2004
6:00 to 8:00pm
The House of Glunz
1206 N. Wells St., Chicago

$45 Taster
$100 Connoisseur
$250 Wine Master

Please pay in advance or at the door.

Make checks payable to:
Friends of Jeff Smith

Or RSVP online at:
www.jeffsmith2004.com

Special thanks to: Christopher Donovan, Louis Glunz Wines , Heather Schoenfeld, Brad McCracken, Scott Neninger, Stephanie Valier, Matt Smith, John Lawrence, Janey Miller, Bradley Serot, Steve Sadin, and Grant Christman Design.

Printed in-house, Labor donated