Uncategorized

Meet Daniel Bliss at the Chicago DKos Meet-up

Chicago Kossacks, on Thursday, September 20th, we are having a Chicago DK Meetup at the Blue Agave.  The guest of honor is fellow Kossack and candidate for the Illinois State House District 17, Daniel Biss!!  Daniel is a true people-powered candidate, having reached as high as #2 on the Actblue fundraising list, behind only John Edwards for a week.  His campaign kick-off rally several weeks back was attended by over 150 people!  Standing room only!

As alivingston’s diary says, the details on the event are as follows:

Date:  Thursday, September 20
Time:  8:00 pm
Place:  Blue Agave, raised level (this has been reserved)
Address:  just off intersection of State and Maple.
(Not to complicate, but two addresses are given since it’s an intersection)
1 West Maple Street, Chicago IL, 60610
1050 N. State Street, Chicago IL, 60610
Blue Agave phone: 312.335.8900

I should add that this is just a couple of blocks east of the clark and division Red Line stop.

Daniel’s a great candidate, and if you haven’t met him, you should come on out.

If you’ve never been to a DKos Meetup, you definitely should come out.  Your fellow Kossacks are great people.

If you’ve never volunteered for a campaign, this is your chance!

I’d also like to add that we are working on lining up candidates for more meetups over the next couple of weeks.  I don’t want to name names, as nothing is confirmed yet, but if we get them all, it’ll make for some great meetups!

Alivingston also said (in the comments) that we have confirmed a candidate for October 4!  Mark Pera will be there!

There is NO cost to attend, and it’s a cash bar if you want anything to eat or drink.

The Point I’ve Been Making about Planned Parenthood in Aurora

From the previous post:

On legal grounds, Aurora’s implied claim that it was somehow misled are even less persuasive, PP/CA argues. It cites a 2001 federal case in New Hampshire that parallels the Aurora situation, in which the court issued an injunction blocking the city of Manchester, N.H. from preventing the opening of a Planned Parenthood clinic after public criticism.

In that case, the court noted: “If the issuing authority was ‘misled’ as to the identity of the prospective tenant who would be providing medical services at the site, that identity would have been irrelevant to any impartial decision … {T]hat the proposed tenant proposed to engage in constitutionally protected activities in providing medical services – such as providing abortion and contraception counseling and services – would have been equally irrelevant.”

The identity of the tenant is irrelevant to zoning. There are some minor exceptions related to slumlords and repeat violators, but those are not applicable in this case. Aurora cannot legally do anything about the new clinic as the property is zoned for that kind of use. In fact, if they put too much of a burden on Planned Parenthood during the review, they could be liable.

Seals: Time To Bring ‘em Home

Seals Calls for an End to War; Criticizes Kirk’s Support for Status Quo and White House Propaganda

 

Petraeus testimony; Bush Speech; and Freedom Watch Ads All Part of War Supporters’ Campaign to Keep U.S . Troops in Iraq

 

 

Wilmette- Calling for Congress to have the courage to end the War in Iraq, Democratic Congressional Candidate Dan Seals criticized Representative Mark Kirk’s continued support of the war, and challenged him to renounce the shameful propaganda ads currently running in the Chicago media market.  

 

“It’s time to bring our troops home.  No more delays, no more spin, no more politics.   We need a Congressman willing to stand up and tell the truth, not fall for further White House propaganda,” Seals said.

 

Freedom’s Watch, headed by former White House spokesperson Ari Fleischer is currently running a “stay-the-course” $1 million dollar ad campaign in the Chicago media market defending George Bush’s failed war policy.  These ads are running in key congressional races across the country to help those members who have helped the White House on Iraq. 

 

The ad defends Kirk & Bush’s failed war policy in Iraq. “Mark Kirk should call upon the Freedom Watch to pull these ads down in Chicago.  Unless he calls for these ads to come down, we can only conclude that he wants them to stay up on his behalf,” stated Dan Seals.

 

“Mark Kirk has been an architect, supporter and cheerleader over the last six years of the worst foreign policy debacle in a generation.  The fact is we deserve elected officials with the courage and judgment to make America safer, not continue to support a disaster,” Seals continued.

  

Mark Kirk has voted against allowing troops the necessary breaks between their deployments and has continually voted against legislation to bring our troops home including The Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act.   It required a responsible redeployment of U.S. troops beginning within 120 days of enactment and ending by April 1, 2008 and for the President to publicly justify the post-redeployment missions for the US military in Iraq and the minimum number of troops necessary to carry out those missions.

 

In March of this year, the Daily Herald noted that, “Republican U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk tweaked his position on the Iraq war a half-dozen times since he first voted to authorize the conflict in 2002.”

 

Seals reaffirmed his strong position by stating that, “I am the only candidate who has opposed the war from the start and the only one who unequivocally supports a responsible timeline for withdraw.”

 

After narrowly escaping a close re-election in 2006, Representative Kirk has been trying to distance himself from the President by voting for the non-binding resolution against the troop surge.  However, when it comes time to vote for a plan to begin the responsible redeployment of our troops, Representative Kirk continually votes against the plan despite his rhetoric.

Read More

Aurora Apparently Thinks it Can Limit Medical Services to the Ones it Might Like

I have to say the kerfluffle over the new Planned Parenthood facility in Aurora is a bit bizarre when you look at the facts:

“Did we hope to avoid disruptive and potentially violent protests that might delay the opening of a facility greatly needed in DuPage and Kane counties? You bet we did,” Trombley said in the letter. “It should be obvious by now why we chose that course.”

Planned Parenthood/Chicago Area staff plan to open a full-service health center at 3051 E. New York St., in the DuPage County section of Aurora. Abortion services will be available.

“I’m not sure what he (Trombley) was hoping to accomplish” with the letter, Weisner told The Beacon News.

The City Council’s Planning and Development Committee approved the final plan for the health center on Nov. 16, 2006. The project did not require full council approval because the land already was zoned for medical office use. The owner was listed as Gemini Office Development LLC.

Planned Parenthood officials, applying under the names Planned Parenthood Association/Chicago Area and Gemini Office Development LLC, asked the Illinois Finance Authority Board in May for approval of the issuance of a type of bond to help fund construction and land acquisition costs of the Aurora health center.

From Planned Parenthood:

Aurora is a largely Hispanic and working class community, and Planned Parenthood saw a growing health care need:

  • Illinois ranked seventh-highest in 2005 for chlamydia rates and 11th-highest for gonorrhea, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • The Guttmacher Institute reports that among the 50 states and the District of Columbia, Illinois ranks 46th in the availability of contraceptive services and supplies.
  • In Illinois, 1,558,620 women are in need of contraceptive services and supplies

What no one seems to be pointing out is that abortion is about 10 percent of what Planned Parenthood does. Abortion is completely legal in the United States. Treating a clinic offering a completely legal medical option differently than another medical option means that a community would have to find some objective criteria based on zoning–and Aurora doesn’t have that ability right now.

Read More

Quite Impressive

John Bambenek filed a complaint lacking in merit to the degree that the FEC actually ruled on it in a reasonable amount of time:

For Immediate Release Contact: Bob Biersack
September 4 , 2007 George Smaragdis
Michelle Ryan

FEC Resolved Two Matters Involving Internet Activity;

Applies Media Exemption to Political Blogs

WASHINGTON – The Federal Election Commission announced today that it has unanimously resolved two complaints alleging that Internet blog activity is subject to Commission regulation, finding that the activity is exempt from regulation under the media or volunteer exemption.

In Matter Under Review (MUR) 5928, the Commission determined that Kos Media, L.L.C., which operates the website DailyKos, did not violate the Federal Election Campaign Act.  The Commission rejected allegations that the site should be regulated as a political committee because it charges a fee to place advertising on its website and it provides “a gift of free advertising and candidate media services” by posting blog entries that support candidates.  The Commission determined that the website falls squarely within the media exemption and is therefore not subject to federal regulation under the Act.

Since 1974, media activity has been explicitly exempted from federal campaign finance regulation.   In March 2006, the Commission made clear that this exemption extends to online media publications and that “costs incurred in covering or carrying a news story, commentary, or editorial by any broadcasting station. . . , Web site, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication, including any Internet or electronic publication,” are not a contribution or expenditure unless the facility is owned by a political party, committee, or candidate.  With respect to MUR 5928, the FEC found that Kos Media meets the definition of a media entity and that the activity described in the complaint falls within the media exemption.   Thus, activity on the DailyKos website does not constitute a contribution or expenditure that would trigger political committee status.  The Commission therefore found no reason to believe Kos Media, DailyKos.com, or Markos Moulitsas Zuniga violated federal campaign finance law.

In MUR 5853, the Commission rejected allegations that Michael L. Grace made unreported expenditures when he leased space on a computer server to create a “blog” which advocated the defeat of Representative Mary Bono in the November 2006 election.  The Commission also rejected allegations that Grace coordinated these expenditures with Bono’s opponent in the race, David Roth, and found that no in-kind contributions to Roth’s campaign resulted from Grace’s blogging activity.  The Commission also found that the respondent did not fraudulently misrepresent himself in violation of 2U.S.C. § 441h.

The Act exempts from regulation volunteer activity by individuals.  In the FEC’s Internet regulations, the Commission clarified that an individual’s use, without compensation, of equipment and personal services for blogging, creating, or hosting a website for the purpose of influencing a Federal election are not expenditures subject to the restrictions of campaign finance law.  Even if there were some costs or value associated with Mr. Grace’s blog, these costs are exempt from Commission regulations.  The FEC therefore found no reason to believe Mr. Grace or the Roth campaign violated federal campaign finance law.

Additional information regarding MURs can be found on the FEC website at http://www.fec.gov/em/mur.shtml.

This release contains only summary information.  For additional details, please consult publicly available documents for each case in the Enforcement Query System (EQS) on the FEC website at http://eqs.nictusa.com/eqs/searcheqs .

1. MUR 5928
RESPONDENTS:
  • Kos Media, LLC
  • DailyKos.com
  • Markos Moulitsas Zuniga
COMPLAINANT: John C.A. Bambenek
SUBJECT: Failure to register as a political committee
DISPOSITION: (a-c) No reason to believe there was any violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act

The Commission found that Kos Media, LLC, and DailyKos are media entities. As a result, the activities described in the complaint are exempt from the definitions of contribution or expenditure.

DOCUMENTS ON PUBLIC RECORD: Documents from this matter are available from the Commission’s web site at http://www.fec.gov by entering 5928 under case numbers in the Enforcement Query System. They are also available in the FEC’s Public Records Office at 999 E St. NW in Washington.