The Adults are Back In Charge

Exactly What is the Argument in the Trib Editorial

From Friday

The confirmation of Michael Mukasey as the next U.S. attorney general is in trouble. Some Democratic leaders are threatening to kill the nomination in the Senate Judiciary Committee next week unless Mukasey explicitly declares that a harsh interrogation technique known as waterboarding is illegal.

He won’t do that. And he shouldn’t.

Mukasey’s stand has nothing to do with whether he favors the technique, which gives prisoners the sensation of drowning. He doesn’t. He has said he’s personally against it, that it is “repugnant” and “over the line.”
But he won’t say it is illegal. And there’s at least one important reason: Such a declaration could open the potential for criminal prosecution or lawsuits against CIA officers who used the harsh interrogation practice. It could also endanger their bosses and anyone else who authorized the practice.

Why, yes, it could open up for prosecution people who waterboarded others.  Here’s a hint why it matters, the Attorney General is supposed to enforce the law.

It gets better

A vote for Mukasey is not a vote to defend waterboarding. The technique is illegal under the 2005 anti-torture amendment promoted by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). That law prohibited “cruel, inhuman and degrading” treatment of prisoners — including waterboarding, as McCain and others reiterated in a letter sent to Mukasey this week.

So now, the Trib has completely undercut its argument because if it is clearly illegal, then why won’t Mukasey say it is?

It isn’t a dangerous liability if people broke the law to say that they broke the law. It is the rule of law.

Carefully Monitored Torture

Isn’t so bad according to Fran over at Illinois Review

Seems like good enough reasons to push these cold-blooded murderers ’til just short of the breaking point, doesn’t it?  Waterboarding is carefully monitored torture — something they can avoid if they tell what they know.

And because these radical extremists decapitate innocent journalists and strap bombs to children, we know they will not fight according to traditional war decorum, they choose to operate outside the protection of the Geneva Convention Rules.

Careful monitoring of torture is apparently fine.  But torturing someone without careful monitoring—ooooohhhhh noooooo.  We don’t do that.

In other fun, George Dienhart suggests that since George Bush isn’t doing the same things as Musharraf, it’s silly to criticize the President. It is left unclear as to when one might start complaining, but let me suggest a few criteria:

  • Politicizing the Justice Department
  • Ignoring Habeas Corpus enshrined in 1215
  • Ignoring the 4th Amendment (no one is against wiretapping calls, they just want warrants–even if the warrants can be granted retroactively)
  • Torture–something we specifically forbade because of a previous tyrant’s abuses
  • Issuing signing statements that directly contradict US Law
  • and more if you want

He’s not protecting the free world by damaging the rule of law.

But everything can be blamed on Bill Clinton

We knew that Nuclear Weapons in Pakistan were bad. At least I knew. Apparently, the Clinton administration had no strong feelings either way. On May 28, 1998 Pakistan announced that it had successfully conducted five nuclear tests You remember 1998. It was toward the end of the Clinton administration. Pakistan could have built nuclear weapons during the Reagan and Bush administrations. They did not. Again, we see that Bill Clinton is responsible for a major foreign policy blunder. This one could potentially result in thousands of American deaths.

Nice story, but it’s not true:

India’s 1974 testing of a nuclear “device” gave Pakistan’s nuclear program new momentum. Through the late 1970s, Pakistan’s program acquired sensitive uranium enrichment technology and expertise. The 1975 arrival of Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan considerably advanced these efforts. Dr. Khan is a German-trained metallurgist who brought with him knowledge of gas centrifuge technologies that he had acquired through his position at the classified URENCO uranium enrichment plant in the Netherlands. Dr. Khan also reportedly brought with him stolen uranium enrichment technologies from Europe. He was put in charge of building, equipping and operating Pakistan’s Kahuta facility, which was established in 1976. Under Khan’s direction, Pakistan employed an extensive clandestine network in order to obtain the necessary materials and technology for its developing uranium enrichment capabilities.

In 1985, Pakistan crossed the threshold of weapons-grade uranium production, and by 1986 it is thought to have produced enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon. Pakistan continued advancing its uranium enrichment program, and according to Pakistani sources, the nation acquired the ability to carry out a nuclear explosion in 1987.

Why Does Illinois Review Hate America?

I was hoping this was a joke, a very, very bad joke

Karzai offers Taliban a government office.

KABUL, Afghanistan – President Hamid Karzai offered Saturday to meet personally with Taliban leader Mullah Omar for peace talks and give the militants a high position in a government ministry as a way to end the rising insurgency in Afghanistan.

Reiterating a call for negotiations he has made with increasing frequency over the last several weeks, Karzai also said he was willing to meet with factional warlord leader and former Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.

Specifically.

Mullah Omar.

A Tale of Two Headlines

Sun-Times

Pelosi to Bush: ‘It’s an insult’

IRAQ | President will pull out 30,000 troops, but Democrat scoffs

Trib 

Swamp TV — Bush embraces Petraeus’ troop cuts

Now, both stories are not so good. Both cover Pelosi’s quotes, but not the fact that there aren’t enough brigades to keep up the level of troops.   This has been known for months so reporting this as some sort of drawdown by Bush is silly. He’s exhausted the military

Time for a New Boland Amendment

The Boland Amendment was actually a series of amendments passed in the 1980s that eventually banned any money from the US Government being spent as military aid to the Contras in Nicaragua.

We need a new one, only this one should be to ban the spending of any money by the US Government to fight within the territorial limits of Iran.  We might stick a two year time limit on it since any other administration wouldn’t be crazy enough to do it barring a real provocation.  Right now, it is very plausible that this administration and it’s willing enablers like Lieberman will create a provocation to attack Iran-something that can only result in a complete disaster for the entire region, if not planet:
.[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/ibpyameu5Zc" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

The only way to stop this from happening it to make it so military leaders can refuse to follow Bush’s order for an attack, and making it illegal would give them that leverage.

Where is Ed Boland When You Need Him?

He’d never attack Iran would he?

Of course he would.

Congress needs to pass something like the Boland Amendment that any military attack on Iraq errr…Iran (updated) requires the explicit approval of Congress. Then when he does it anyway, impeach him.

No, I’m not kidding. Any Democrat who doesn’t stand up for this sort of thing ought to be defeated in the primaries. It’s hard to imagine how devastating such an attack would have on the world and would destroy the United States’ chance to recover from this miserable Presidency.

2 Years Ago

I remember watching WWL-TV and the following interview with Ray Nagin:

Mayor Nagin appears on WWLTV to provide viewers with a “status report” on the city:

“My heart is heavy. I don’t have any good news to really share. Other than at some point in time the federal government will be coming in here in mass. But, the city is in a state of devastation. Eighty percent of it is under water, as much as 20 feet in some places. There’s an incredible amount of water in the city. Residents are on roofs and trapped in attics, awaiting rescue. Fire, Police, and National Guard personnel are out rescuing those trapped right now. Both airports are under water.

Twin spans in New Orleans East are totally destroyed. Three huge boats have run aground. An oil tanker has run aground and is leaking oil. There is a serious [floodwall-levee] break at 17th Street Canal,” and the water continues to rise.

Houses have been picked up off their foundation and moved. The Yacht Club has burned; it’s totally destroyed. A barge has hit one of the main structures of High Rise (a bridge/span) and we’re not sure that the High Rise is structurally sound.

All of Slidell is under water. Most of Metaraie is under water. “The list just goes on and on.” There are gas leaks throughout the city. It’s not a pretty picture. On the somewhat good news side, many people have survived. Uptown is pretty dry. The French Quarter and Central Business District is dry, but they also have buildings that look like a bazooka was shot through. There is no clear path in or out of the city, whether east or west. I-10 West is still full of water.…

The water system has been contaminated except for the Central Business District and Algiers. We have no electricity and they expect electricity to be out about 4-6 weeks. “And the list goes on and on.” Nagin reports that flooding is worst in New Orleans East and in the Lower 9th Ward, but it’s “coming from everywhere.”

Nagin is basing his information on a briefing he received, apparently from Marty Evans, President of the Red Cross. Nagin states that he is reading from a briefing provided by a FEMA official (later identified as Marty Bahamonde). “The FEMA guy here is saying that 80 percent of New Orleans is under water and a significant portion of Metaraie and Kenner—everything north of I-10 is under water.” Nagin also reports that St. Bernard is in even worse shape: “There is total devastation in St. Bernard alone.”

But Michael Chertoff didn’t know the levee was breached until late the next morning. He’s still running Homeland Security. Why?

More from the New York Times:

WASHINGTON, Feb. 9 — In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Bush administration officials said they had been caught by surprise when they were told on Tuesday, Aug. 30, that a levee had broken, allowing floodwaters to engulf New Orleans.

But Congressional investigators have now learned that an eyewitness account of the flooding from a federal emergency official reached the Homeland Security Department’s headquarters starting at 9:27 p.m. the day before, and the White House itself at midnight.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency official, Marty Bahamonde, first heard of a major levee breach Monday morning. By late Monday afternoon, Mr. Bahamonde had hitched a ride on a Coast Guard helicopter over the breach at the 17th Street Canal to confirm the extensive flooding. He then telephoned his report to FEMA headquarters in Washington, which notified the Homeland Security Department.

“FYI from FEMA,” said an e-mail message from the agency’s public affairs staff describing the helicopter flight, sent Monday night at 9:27 to the chief of staff of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and recently unearthed by investigators. Conditions, the message said, “are far more serious than media reports are currently reflecting. Finding extensive flooding and more stranded people than they had thought — also a number of fires.”

Michael D. Brown, who was the director of FEMA until he resigned under pressure on Sept. 12, said in a telephone interview Thursday that he personally notified the White House of this news that night, though he declined to identify the official he spoke to.

White House officials have confirmed to Congressional investigators that the report of the levee break arrived there at midnight, and Trent Duffy, the White House spokesman, acknowledged as much in an interview this week, though he said it was surrounded with conflicting reports.

But the alert did not seem to register. Even the next morning, President Bush was feeling relieved that New Orleans had “dodged the bullet,” he later recalled. Mr. Chertoff, similarly confident, flew Tuesday to Atlanta for a briefing on avian flu. With power out from the high winds and movement limited, even news reporters in New Orleans remained unaware of the full extent of the levee breaches until Tuesday.

The federal government let out a sigh of relief when in fact it should have been sounding an “all hands on deck” alarm, the investigators have found.

 Mark Kirk

“I think we should look to winding up the mission.” [Chicago Daily Herald, 3/19/07]

 

“If the report comes back bad we need to make changes, we need to adjust the strategy, absolutely.” [Chicago Daily Herald, 7/11/07]

 

You see, Concerned Kirk is concerned, but not enough to actually do something to stop this war.  He voted against the proposal to redeploy troops by April 8th.

The Trib editorializes that there hasn’t been enough progress citing some military progress that is actually quite dubious.

Iraqi leaders were supposed to seize this moment of reduced violence to forge a united Iraq. Instead they’re as divided as ever. Judging from this report and political conditions on the ground in Iraq, American soldiers are buying time for Iraqi leaders to do absolutely nothing.There was a flicker of progress a few days ago, for instance, a potential deal on divvying up oil profits, one of the most important benchmarks demanded of the Iraqis by Congress and the president.

Then it fell apart. On Wednesday, just a day before the release of the White House report, Kurdish leaders, who had earlier backed the law, gave it a shove over the cliff. So much for political reconciliation.

That’s not the only political failure, just the most publicized. The government has also failed to pass a vital law easing restrictions on some former Baath party members. And it has failed to establish a provincial elections law so that local elections can be held.

This is a civil war.  The solution is that someone wins by force or a political solution is created.  For a political solution to work everyone has to get something they want.  The question no one seems to want to ask this administration is what is it that we have that the Shiites want in Iraq that they cannot get through winning a civil war?

Nothing and we are arming them.  The solution will happen with us there or not there and we don’t have a political solution we can offer that gives the Shiites anything they want.  We are useless other than to speed along the Shiite victory with American troops.  The President is horribly confused if he thinks the problem is that another Afghanistan  Pakistan. The Shiites and the traditional Sunnis don’t like Al Qaeda in Iraq and they will kill them There is no Mullah Omar there.

He’s busy anyway.  In Pakistan, where Al Qaeda is regrouping.   How about a surge there?

Surgeon Generals Carmona and Koop Hate America

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/UQG4Bpp9ccQ" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/35Rl7NDbUPo" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

I’m sure the usual suspects will dismiss this as they have every other effort of this administration to tamper with science in the bureaucracy, but it’s becoming clear this administration is the worst in modern times.  It has no respect for the rule of law, it has no respect for reality, and it has no integrity.
Carmona is the American dream