October 2004

Wow–Was Keyes a Mistake

Obama is being very generous to the party:

MILWAUKEE — Everybody wants a piece of Barack Obama. Ahead by a mile in his race for the U.S. Senate from Illinois, the youthful state senator with huge ambitions is taking his show on the road to help Democrats from the bottom of the ticket to the very top.

In the past week, Obama has mailed checks totaling $260,000 to Senate candidates in 13 states, including $53,000 to the do-or-die campaign of Minority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (S.D.). He donated $100,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and $150,000 to party organizations in key states, including Florida, Wisconsin and Colorado.

Dred Scott==Roe v. Wade

And if you didn’t pick that up in Illinois you haven’t been paying attention to Alan Keyes.

For a rant on how Bush is completely confused on the Constitutional Law involvedin Dred Scott read Jack Balkin. For those that care about such matters, this is exactly why Bush shouldn’t be choosing Supreme Court Justices. The Taney Court was probably correct on the narrow decision given the, you know, language of the Constitution:

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, But shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due

Dred Scott’s claim was that since he had been in free territory, he should no longer be property. The issue is difficult in terms of how to decide if one is a strict constructionist–but not in the way Bush thinks. Bush misses the fact that personal property rights in regards to slavery were guaranteed under the Constitution–Taney didn’t dream them up.

A man who doesn’t understand Dred Scott shouldn’t be President. And yes, everyone before him did understand it. The overreaching was claiming no African-American could be a citizen-not that slaveholders had property rights. This is why Thurgood Marshall called the doument flawed at its inception. It was. One can understand that historically and still celebrate it, but one would hope the President would know a case that no one should get out of a PoliSci 101 class without knowing.

If Democrats Try

and play sexual ambiguity as some sort of issue–they might remember we are supposed to be the party of tolerance and acceptance. I know of one case this cycle and a potential one in another where Dems might be thinking of outing a GOPer who happens to be gay. In neither case does the person gay bait themselves (and I don’t think outing is right there) and so the issue should be off the table. If it’s put on the table, the Dems deserve to lose.

Pat Buchanan was an interesting

selection for announcer on MSNBC at one of the most Jewish campuses not on the East Coast.

In other funny Buchanan moments, Ramsin–commenting below actually called in and was pretty much ignored. Buchanan then, bizarrely asked him if he was Assyrian and Ramsin said yes. The thing not many probably picked up on was that Assyrians largely ran the mob in St. Louis–and towards the end, not very well. But Buchanan spent a part of his time as a writer at the Globe Democrat in the 1960s and his reaction–even though a national call–seemed to harken back to that. Maybe I’m overanalyzing, but that’s how I took it.

But What’s the Point?

Rich Miller’s weekly column addresses Pat Quinn’s disappearance and points out the most egregious of sell outs by the Blagojevich administration–the delaying of regulatory review of coal powered sources. The sound from Quinn–silence. What good is it to be reelected if you are a political eunich.

But getting back to the Blagojevich administration’s decision, it could be worse, but it’s hard to say how. The reasoning is that because the feds are putting in new rules eventually, Illinois should wait. The argument goes that putting new regulations on Illinois would lead, under a deregulated energy market in Illinois, to power plants being built in other states leaving Illinois with fewer sources of power and less ability to regulate those who ship power to Illinois.

The irony of the above is that a deregulated industry is actually not causing fits of laughter as they try and encourage deregulation while saying it could lead to an inability to regulate power if we enforce current clean air laws. But why doesn’t that matter in Illinois? No ones paying attention.

Of course, what this misses is that power production is not highly relocatable. Certainly you can build some over the borders and you can transmit it, but economically it still doesn’t make sense to send it to far or the loss in the wires makes the costs too high. It’s a bogus threat to say you’ll relocate to other states at this point. The technology isn’t that good yet.

That said, the cost factor of only looking at what it costs Illinoisans in the short term avoids the point that eventually the EPA will have to address these problems. If Illinois is ahead of the curve, it can actually create an environment where utilities are geared up to deal with stricter standards and set it so the incentive system to get there is the least disruptive.

But The Blagorgeous won’t make that argument–instead he decided to look around and go, “Everyone else is doing it.”

The Polls

The two polls I took down were unclear on the timeline of when they occurred. I shouldn’t have put them up at all until I clarified the situation, but being in a hurry, I thought they’d be interesting. Given the issues I’m going to leave them down. The Coulson poll below is an early poll (I believe) which I should have picked up on by looking at it closer. The mistake was my own for not taking the time to get what I was putting up straight. Berkowitz has a bit on some of it.