The Trib Gets One Right: Debra Shore

Point source water pollution is a passion of mine. Most of you wouldn’t know it largely because I understand that most folks fell asleep at the third word.

Another passion of mine is electing qualified, quality progressive candidates who watch out for the public interest. Dean, with all of his failures, also understood building from the ground up was essention and here in Misery, we are seeing some progress even.

Those two interests come together in a race that I’ve ignored far too much, especially given how strong one of the candidates is.

The Trib labels her:

Priority One this year is the nomination of Debra Shore, a founding director of Friends of the Forest Preserves and editor of Chicago Wilderness magazine.

Frankly that’s too weak of an endorsement. Another obsession of mine is how local and state government is ignored despite their greater impact on people’s lives (hence, Archpundit was one of the first state politics blogs).

Debra Shore has built a campaign that actually grabs people’s attention for a slot they never knew they voted for before. And she gives a damn about clean water to boot.

Most of the time, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District positions are filled by union backed candidates who will support new construction ignoring what might be best for our environment and the consumer. I normallly respect the Chicago Federation of Labor’s endorsements even when I disagree with them, but this and the Stroger endorsement ignore far larger issues that should be important to the area.

The only regret I have about this endorsement is that I meant to do it some months ago and got sidetracked. Debra even contacted me and I dropped the ball. That is unfortunate because between her, Claypool and Sullivan, there are not any races of clearer importance to Chicagoland voters. Debra is a hell of an activist and with your help, she’ll be a fantastic commissioner. Donate and volunteer as you can.

The Disadvantages of Being Down South

I had no idea how big this would be–though neither did many in Chicago. Worse, the Governor is, again, making me praise him–it’s some sort of plot.

Actually, I do believe that in one sense, but it doesn’t involve angry people on the internet. The best thing you can do right now from a Team Blagojevich vantage point is activate the Oberweis anti-immigration supporters to get them to the polls on election day. It’s good policy meets good politics. It also makes Judy take a stand which puts her in a sticky position–though I think it’s safe to say Oberweis won’t be running any immigration commercials in the primary.

This was huge and make no mistake about it–in Illinois, a strong anti-immigration campaign isn’t going anywere.

The Buchanan-Lipinski Front

Leo hits a point that has been missing on IL-03 race. The issue of social conservatism is too often thought of as an issue of abortion only. There are many issues that social conservatives have latched on to though and one of the important ones is immigration and trade.

Lipinski looks like a Dem because he voted against CAFTA, but not for the same reasons most Dems would have (I’m pretty agnostic for a whole bunch of reasons). The reality is that Dan Lipinski is a guy by all accounts I can gather, voted for Pat Buchanan in 2000 and I’m pretty sure that Buchanan’s views on social issues and immigration were key. 36 Democrats voted for HR 4437 and I’m betting the Lipinski was the guy with the highest Latinor or close to the highest Latino population to vote for it at 21.3%. The continued exploitation by both parties in Southwestern Chicagoland of Latinos must stop. Parties have used and abused them throughout the area including Cicero and other areas where Latinos were only allowed to progress if they helped the machines out (remember this is an area of both Democratic and Republican machines–Skippy).

Via Illinois DemNet we see what Blagojevich had to say:

“Whether their names are Gutierrez or Lozano, Lipinski or Blagojevich; it doesn’t matter. This is a country built by immigrants.”

I don’t know if the Governor realized it or not, but either way, he made a fantastic point. Go down to Elmwood Park or that area and see the Polish immigrants that still live down there. When I worked for Circuit City back when it opened the Chicago market, I visited that store. The number one salesman was a guy who worked the warehouse until they figured out he could speak Polish and needed him on the sales floor. A guy like Lipinski might get that. They were people who and/or both fled persecution and a bad economy and that is the most American thing of all.

My relatives fled the potato famine from what I understand and some of them became thugs on the East Side in St. Clair County when Irish gangs ran the rackets for others. Most of the family worked hard and made a better life for themselves.

I’d bet the Lipinski’s have a similar story, but with more of him around, there won’t be many more families like that. We’ll be the poorer for it.

One-fifth of the 3rd District is Latino. It would be a shame if they were represented by a guy who seems to think they are only good as machine cogs. Go visit John Sullivan’s web site and volunteer and donate.

I consider there to be three vital races in this years election for progressives, this is one of them.

The Quote from Weller’s Office

Grand Old Partisan raised some questions concerning the City News Article that were reasonable.

There is something else I’m tracking down that made me not even flinch about the quote, but still a reasonable question so I tracked down the journalist, James Taylor, who wrote the story. He graciously allowed me to print the quote from Weller’s office in Taylor’s voice describing the situation

The quote followed the man being informed of our poll and the results and it also followed our reply to questions about the newspaper, ie. who are our primary readers, area we circulate in and a statement, “Aren’t most of your readers black and Democrats…”

“We don’t think that the opinions of African American voters will have a big impact on this election.”

Taylor’s reasoning for not naming the staffer is not the usual one, but I think makes a good point. He doesn’t want the staffer to be a scapegoat. You might disagree with Taylor on it, but I see his point and personally think its a good idea.

Taylor also said the poll was a survey of the general public and readers. As I mentioned before, the methodology what you’d expect from a full blown pollster, it’s an interesting finding for a paper that serves a defined community. Again, I wouldn’t hold it up as gospel, but as an interesting story for the community served.

Grand Old Partisan also questions whether or not a staffer in a Congressional office would answer that question–my take is that it isn’t that uncommon. Some offices are sticklers for avoiding that sort of thing, while others are pretty loose so it didn’t stick out to me, but a reasonable point to make. I’m pretty confident in Taylor’s reporting and while I don’t take the poll overly seriously, it’s interesting which I’m betting is what they were shooting for.

And thanks again to Taylor who was very quick to reply and quite helpful.

It’s Tightening

Republican Poll Numbers from Research 2000 conducted for Post-Dispatch and KMOV

Judy 36%
Uberweis 25%
Gidwitz 19%
Brady 11%
Martin 1% (funny, usually a name like Martin is worth a few points itself)
Undecided 8%

Lots more good stuff, but this is the biggest news.

Gidwitz and Oberweis’ twin attacks really might throw this into a three way race–at this point, Brady is dead in the water and doesn’t have enough money to rise above the noise. Oberweis needs some of those to break his way, and Gidwitz needs his and Oberweis’ attacks to move people away from Judy towards him.

Best Line of the Week

Rich has a column that wins hand down for the best political column in sometime, but Lynn Sweet’s column on the 3rd District has a great line:

The poll also shows that if enough people know about how William Lipinski sneaked his son into office, it will change their opinion of if he deserves another term. Happy to oblige.

I don’t have high ethical expectations of Illinois politicians, but the Lipinski switch really was quite brazen.

She also mentions those of us who pointed out her blog before it went with a big public announcement–and of course, she’s welcome. I’m a big fan of reporters having a chance to report the small tidbits that don’t fit in a column and have the basic source material available. It’s a huge addition to the news organizations and I am a big fan of her columns anyway.

Kelly: A Financial Planner

Under the category of when your campaign can hurt your business, the man claims to have $78,001 cash on hand having only raised $43,900. It’s Bush Math!

It’s as if negative numbers hadn’t been discovered yet. I’m pretty sure this is not a good sign for his business, his campaign, his legal situation, nor if he were by some miracle to make it to Congress, his ability to know a damn thing about the federal budget.

Pre-Primary: Sullivan D-IL-03

Raised: 18544.84
Spent: 33872.55
COH: 13832.48

John had a tough time because he was working during the day until the first of the year. The problem right now is he doesn’t have enough for a killer mail piece–and so against my general philosophy of throwing money in at the last minute to candidates–go donate and volunteer now!

Two things here–Lipinski hasn’t done bumpkus in running for office except perhaps planting a clown. He hasn’t done any mailing, nor any other voter outreach besides parades. He’s relatively vulnerable. Second, I think John has his weaknesses as a candidate to date, he’s it and he’s right on the issues. If John can get his message out to Democratic voters, he wins. This isn’t a choice between progressives, but between two conservatives and a moderate-liberal Democrat.