But unlike single issue pro-life voters, Fox’s interest in the topic is completely altruistic. That’s right, it’s wholly self-centered.
Playing for the sympathy of the electorate, Fox manipulates the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease to promote stem cell research while at the same time bashing pro-lifers who are opposed to human embryonic stem cell research.
Yes, that’s right. By speaking on the issue and appearing as he is, he’s manipulating the symptons of Parkinson’s disease.
Even better, he just gets the science wrong. From the Wash U piece on stem cell research (which clearly does differentiate between types of stem cells and explains why there is such interest in embryonic stem cell research):
Embryonic stem cells are strikingly different from adult stem cells because they are pluripotent?they can differentiate into any type of mature cell. The possibility is strong that they could replace diseased or deteriorated cells and heal different parts of the human body.
To understand SCNT, one must first understand how the process differs from the early-stage human reproductive cycle. Several days after normal fertilization occurs in human beings, and before implantation in the womb, a pinpoint-sized ball called a blastocyst forms. The structure consists of undifferentiated cells including embryonic stem cells. Once the blastocyst implants itself in the womb, its cells begin to differentiate into various organs and structures. SCNT, however, is different and has nothing to do with the process and products of conception.
What somatic cell nuclear transfer offers medical researchers is a way of generating embryonic stem cells without a sperm fertilizing an egg. (The word somatic applies to all the cells in the body with the exception of sperms and eggs, which are called germ cells.)
Teitelbaum explains the SCNT procedure (see graphic at right): “The nucleus of an unfertilized egg is replaced with the nucleus from a somatic cell, such as a skin cell, from the patient who will ultimately be transplanted with the appropriate differential cells. It becomes a structure that looks similar to?but is very different from?a blastocyst produced by a sperm and an egg. Within it are embryonic stem cells but?and this is critical?they are unable to undergo the genetic reprogramming that, after sexual reproduction, permits the development of a healthy baby. And these SCNT-generated embryonic stem cells (ESC) have nothing to do with products of abortion and nothing to do with a sperm fertilizing an egg.”
Because the cells produced by SCNT contain the patient’s own DNA, there is a strong possibility that they will not be rejected after transplantation, even without the use of anti-rejection medication with its severe side-effects.
Equating undifferentiated cells of a blastocyst with a fully developed human is exactly the kind of misleading argument Smith thinks he is attacking.
Yes, that’s right. By speaking on the issue and appearing as he is, he’s manipulating the symptons of Parkinson’s disease.
Even better, he just gets the science wrong.
For the sake of clarifying your pronouns, I take it the first “he” refers to Fox, while the second “he” points to Smith?
There is a bigger problem, here. The politicization of science. It was stupid when it was done to Galileo and it is stupid today.
And yes, there may be promise in embyonic stem cell research, but all the positive developments are coming from adult stem cells, righ now. I’ve seen some of that first hand.
There is a lot of money going into both, which is good. What I fear is politicians stepping in and picking winners and losers. Are other promising avenues of research going to be neglected because stem cell research is the hot political issue?
Our scientific community is able to weigh the moral and technical matters w/out the overheated rhetoric of campaigns. National Institute for Sciences do a pretty good job of setting agendas based on the science and the ethics. I know there is research going on that would allow embryonic stem cells to be pulled from fertilized eggs w/out killing the embryo.
Everyone wins in that scenario..Why not throw some money at that? Oh, wait if that happened we couldn’t be morally indignant toward each other…
…This is why I focus on economic issues…