Illinois Congressional Races

Stop the Stupids

Tammy Duckworth makes the case well in the radio response to the President:

Tammy Duckworth
National Radio Address
?We Need a New Congress, and a New Direction in Iraq?
Hello. My name is Tammy Duckworth.

Almost two years ago, the Black Hawk helicopter I was co-piloting in Iraq was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade. When I woke up at Walter Reed Army Medical Center ten days later, my husband Bryan told me that I had lost both my legs.

Despite that, I don?t regret my service for a minute. I was honored to serve when my country called. In fact, I?m still an active member of the National Guard.

I?m extremely proud of the thousands of brave U.S. troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan under the most difficult circumstances. They?re doing their duty, and doing it well.

But as I went through my recovery, I started asking myself whether our leaders in Washington are doing their duty.

After more than three years, more than 2,700 U.S. deaths and tens of thousands of wounded, this administration still lacks a plan for securing Iraq. And the leaders of Congress still refuse to do their job of holding the administration accountable.

So, instead of a plan or a strategy, we get shallow slogans like Mission Accomplished and Stay the Course.

Those slogans are calculated to win an election. But they won?t help us accomplish our mission in Iraq.

Just this past week, the National Intelligence Estimate revealed the unhappy truth: the war in Iraq has led to more terrorism, not less. These are the conclusions of our sixteen national intelligence agencies. Yet the response from the White House is a predictable ?stay the course.?

And anyone who challenges our failed policies, or suggests the need for a new strategy, is accused of ?cutting and running.?

Well, I didn?t cut and run, Mr. President. Like so many others, I proudly fought and sacrificed.

My helicopter was shot down long after you proclaimed ?Mission Accomplished.?

And I believe the brave men and women who are serving in Iraq today, their families and the American people deserve more than the same empty slogans and political name-calling.

They know what we?re doing isn?t working and that it?s time to change course.

We need a new Congress that will ask the tough questions and work together for solutions rather than attacking the patriotism of those who disagree.

It is time to encourage Iraqi leaders to take control of their own country and make the tough choices that will stop the civil war and stabilize the country.

We also need much better oversight of the billions of U.S. tax dollars we?re spending in Iraq.

So far, the leaders of this Congress have been unwilling to perform this basic task.

We simply can?t go on this way. It?s time for a new direction. And it starts by putting politics and partisanship aside.

Our nation was united after nine-eleven. There was overwhelming support to go after those who attacked us. We all wanted to punish bin Laden and the Taliban who protected him.

But President Bush took his eye off of al Qaeda in Afghanistan to invade Iraq. As a result, our military is stretched to the limit. And the sympathy and support we received from others around the world has been lost.

If I?m elected to Congress, I will go to Washington next year to continue my service by asking the tough questions of administration officials. And if we?re not meeting our goals, I?ll demand to know why.

I want real accountability for the billions of dollars we?re spending in Iraq.

Like all Americans, I want to get our troops home ? as quickly and safely and in the most responsible way possible.

And the next time that Congress considers committing our young men and women to combat, I want to make sure that we?ve asked the right questions:

Is the intelligence correct? Have we planned for the aftermath? Do our troops have the equipment and support that they need?

We?ve had enough banners. We?ve had enough slogans.

We need a new Congress — and a new direction in Iraq.

This is Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, thank you for listening.

How the Hell Do Two High School Teachers Not Know What To Do?

A high school coach/teacher and a history/government teacher didn’t see major red flags upon reading the first set of e-mails?

Hastert taught for 16 years. I believe Shimkus taught for around 7 years.

The notion that two high school teachers–one of whom is a coach where such issues are especially common with female students–didn’t call for an immediate investigation is….

I don’t know it’s so incredibly stupid.

Teachers. Teachers. Teachers didn’t know to do something and left more young men vulnerable to this clown?

If they were still teachers they’d be at least in danger of losing their license and potentially liable for not mandatorily reporting the original incidents.

Can you imagine your local school district dealing with a teacher or principal who didn’t investigate on the first set of e-mails?

I don’t know if Stover can use this effectively since his name recognition is nill, but I’d bet DCCC will have a poll in the field by the end of the weekend.

Laesch, well, he’s probably arguing with another Democrat on a blog.

Teachers. Every possible excuse they could make–and so far even if they weren’t teachers, those excuses were lame–are completely bogus. We had mandatory reporting laws when both of these assclowns were teaching. Maybe they slept through the trainings.

Unfortunate

I always feel bad for the campaign staff of either party when having to deal with one of these:

During an election debate at the weekend in the outskirts of Chicago, Peter Roskam, the Republican candidate for Illinois’s sixth district, trotted out the familiar line that his Democratic opponent wanted America to “cut and run” from Iraq.

His opponent, Tammy Duckworth, a former National Guard pilot who lost both her legs in Iraq last year when her helicopter was shot down by a rocket-propelled grenade, was visibly angry at the exchange. “I just could not believe he would say that to me,” said Ms Duckworth, who now walks on artificial legs with the help of a cane. “I have risked my life to serve my country and you cannot question my patriotism.”

It’s never fun to tell the boss he’s an idiot.

The Challenge for Pavich

Is getting everything to stick to Weller. Contrary to Kristen McQueary, I don’t see the problem with Weller as being he’s able to be so slick as to get out of everything, it’s that there is so much it’s hard to get it to stick.

Two perfect examples are in McQueary’s column:

His father-in-law, Efrain Rios Montt, is a former Guatemalan dictator for whom an arrest warrant was issued in July on charges of genocide, torture, illegal arrest and terrorism for a 1980s insurgency he orchestrated (with the support of the Reagan administration).

Several Weller colleagues, including U.S. Reps. Jan Schakowsky and Dan Lipinski, signed a recent letter urging the U.S. Department of Justice to assist and cooperate in Montt’s prosecution, if it moves forward.

———

The arrest warrant for Weller’s father-in-law was issued by a wacky judge in Spain.

“It was frivolity ? freelancing by one Spanish judge. I guess he can’t go to Spain, but it’s not as if there are people in Guatemala looking for him.”

Letting Weller’s spokesperson get away with that ignores that George Bush’s State Department actually took the pretty much unprecedented step of warning against a right wing candidate winning. It’s not some weird judge in Spain, it’s the US Government and a US Government that has often played footsie with right wing authoritarians in Latin America.

Official Washington’s distaste for the retired general, who took a distant third place in polling, was reiterated Monday when State Department spokesman Richard Boucher referred to him as ”former dictator Rios Montt” in reviewing the election results.

Last summer, after Rios Montt’s candidacy was approved by the Guatemalan Supreme Court, Boucher had warned that, ”in light of Mr. Rios Montt’s background, it would be difficult to have the kind of relationship that we would prefer”.

The statement marked the first time in more than a decade that Washington had publicly warned a Central American electorate against a right-wing presidential candidate.

In contrast, on Monday Boucher stressed that the two leading candidates were both acceptable. ”We look forward to working with either Mr. Berger or Mr. Colom to strengthen U.S.-Guatemala relations”.

There is no question about Rios Montt being a genocidal dictator. He’s evil. He’s not just a bad man. He’s evil.

Letting this go is just as bad:

And blaming Prosser, a Weller contributor, for a 900-number phone line “is like saying SBC and AT&T are phone sex operators.” Prosser’s was a legitimate company that Weller tried to help, Shearer said.

SBC and AT&T? Errr…no. The Columbia Journalism Review did a story on Prosser’s efforts to buy the major newspaper that had been critical of him in the Virgin Islands. Where did CJR get the information? Atlantic Tele Network’s SEC Filings. That story gives you all sorts of information about Prosser’s ties to corrupt politicians.

Now, McQueary’s point is that he’s smooth and while I disagree with her conclusion, she wrote a decent article so I’m exempting her from this, but when the press takes this he said she said bullshit and allows it to stand despite the actual evidence the voters are failed.

Weller has ties to the worst of the elements in the Caribean and Central America and he tries to dismiss them with jokes. The press bites for some reason I can’t figure out. His press people are lying and there should be consequences to that.

If you follow the money to Cornelius Prior, Prosser’s business partner in the phone sex business, you find that Prior made contributions to the ROYB fund as did Prosser as well as big money Republican donations–these guys are a part of the K Street Project and Jerry Weller is right in the middle of it.

If anyone wants to actually connect the dots.

Seals an Emerging Race

Dan Seals continues to grab lots of attention and the DCCC added him to a list of Emerging Races where Democratic candidates that have made their race potentially competitive. Seals, as I mentioned in my interview with him, came up fast and surprised many, but he has many supporters both in Illinois and DC where he has earned quick respect from his campaign successes.

That makes all five Illinois races I’ve pointed out in Illinois as having been identified by the DCCC. They’ve been quieter on the 11th as everyone expects Weller to come out swinging soon.

Red to Blue

The much maligned DCCC released its new Red to Blue list and actually got some credit (I’m not a maligner).

Our own Phil Hare made the list and he has a necktie.

Zinga is another one of the many Republican candidates who cannot explain what their position is on Social Security.

Go help Phil out. He’s in one of the oddest District in Illinois so making sure this doesn’t turn competitive by way of geography is a good way to stop any Democrat seats from being lost this cycle.

Campaign Finance Dilemma: How Do You Put Down Social Security Privatization Support by Your Opponent as In Kind

Really, how do you thank the President, the Treasury Secretary, the Chair of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Social Security, The House Majority Leader, and the President’s OMB Office for promising to continue pushing a proposal that is deeply unpopular with independent voters?

Of course, the Bamboozlement over the issue continues as many in the press seem to think that a program that affects every American is not a big issue to worry about and Illinois Republican candidates for Congress try like hell to avoid the issue.

But, if the press does it’s job, Roskam and McSweeney have made their positions clear in his responses to the National Taxpayer Union’s candidate questionaire.

Both answer yes to the following question:

SOCIAL SECURITY CHOICE. I recognize that Social Security will default on its obligations to future retirees unless fundamental reforms are made. Therefore, I will work and vote for a system of Social Security Choice that will allow younger workers to have the choice of investing much of their Social Security taxes in regulated individual retirement accounts. Current retirees and those nearing retirement would not have any change in their Social Security benefits. Social Security Choice will give younger workers the option of ownership of personal Social Security accounts, with higher rates of return and better benefits than are possible under the current system.

That is a perfect description of the CATO plan which is essentially the outlines of the President’s plan that wasn’t a plan.

Making matters even more interesting is Roskam’s response to AARP

Without a doubt, Social Security must be protected. At the same time, I believe Social Security must be strengthened so that it can pay retirement benefits for years and years to come. Although no current or near retiree is facing benefit cuts, the benefits for future generations are at risk simply because the number of retirees continues to grow relative to the number of available workers who pay into the system. Therefore, I believe we should look at ways to improve the overall retirement security for all of us. If I am fortunate to serve you in Washington, I will examine all the proposals that are on the table. My position is that we must find a way to strengthen and protect Social Security without raising payroll taxes, without reducing benefits, without raising the retirement age and without privatizing the system.

What’s great is this sentence:

Although no current or near retiree is facing benefit cuts, the benefits for future generations are at risk simply because the number of retirees continues to grow relative to the number of available workers who pay into the system

This has always been true since the inception of the system. It does create challenges, but it certainly doesn’t require this kind of reduction in benefits.