Illinois Congressional Races

And More Stupidity

2. Do nothing and allow Iran to continue to flout the will of the International Community by continuing its unrelenting drive to acquire nuclear weapons. Without the third set of international sanctions, Iran will continue to be in a position to have nuclear weapons within a year and become a nuclear terrorist nation.”

So many problems in such a short paragraph.  First, if we were to provide nuclear weapons to Taiwan, we would violate the NPT and be subject to sanctions ourselves.  In addition, if the US were to remove itself from the NPT framework, the entire framework would collapse meaning that such a move would be completely self-defeating.  Schock and Shearer are amazingly ignorant of the entire NPT framework and are trying to enforce it, by breaking it.

Furthermore, no one thinks that Iran will have a nuclear weapon within one year.  The absolute earliest is three years with most thinking it would take until 2015 or later.  And that is to produce one weapon.  One.

Woefully Ignorant

From the Schock Press Release:

“Iran is a regime that has used every weapon it has ever acquired,” said Schock. “I do not intend to go to Congress and sit idly by while Iran gets nuclear weapons. This is a grave threat to our country and it requires tough diplomatic strategy to resolve peacefully without an invasion or war.”

This is perhaps the most misleading statement in a statement full of garbage.  Iran has never utilized biological or chemical weapons.  In fact, it was entitled to use chemical weapons against Iraq when Iraq used them against Iran, but Iran refused and condemned Iraq for using such weapons and then joined the Chemical Weapons Convention in the 1990s.
Furthermore, no one has alleged Iran is trying to develop biological weapons despite the technological ability and the infrastructure existing to do that since Iran has advanced biological research facilities.

There is some question as to whether Iran has sought technologies for these weapons, but most of that centered on being prepared for another attack by Iraq.

So they have only utilized traditional weapons, not WMDs.  Suggesting they have utilized such weapons is misleading and one might conclude, a purposeful lie.

Versace Response

NEWS RELEASE

 

Dick Versace Criticizes Republican Candidate’s Plan to Dish Out Nuclear Weapons to Taiwan

 

“The last thing we need is another career politician who is willing to make dangerous proposals like this one without first considering the consequences”

 

Peoria, IL — Earlier today, one of the Republican candidates running in the increasingly divisive Republican primary in IL-18, State Representative Aaron Schock, made the following remarks:

 

“If China continues to be irresponsible about nuclear proliferation in Iran, we should tell them that if they do not care about proliferation — and since they are enablers of it in Iran — that if they don’t change their position, we will sell Pershing nuclear missiles to Taiwan for their defense.” [Springfield Journal Register, 11/08/07]

In response, Dick Versace, the Democratic candidate for Illinois 18th Congressional District, issued the following statement:

“I’ve traveled across this great district on the Common Sense Express and I’ve heard what’s important to people in this community. Dishing out nuclear weapons to foreign places like Taiwan wasn’t mentioned. After eight years of reckless foreign policies coming from Washington, the last thing we need is another career politician who is willing to make dangerous proposals like this one without first considering the consequences.”

 

Dick Versace led Bradley’s team for eight years and is widely credited with bringing glory to the program. Under Coach Versace’s leadership Bradley dominated the Missouri Valley Conference and made regular trips to the NCAA tournament. In 1982, Coach Versace led Bradley to the National Invitational Tournament (NIT) championship. Dick Versace is appreciative of the opportunities he’s had to live and work in Peoria. He is the proud father of one son, a daughter, and a step-son and he currently lives in Peoria with his wife Vicki.

Embrace Teh Crazy!

Via Rich

.Schock’s campaign manager, Steven Shearer, responded that “academia routinely looked down on President Reagan and ridiculed him when he said that the Soviet Union was going to fall into the ash heap of history.” Reagan’s controversial positioning of Pershing missiles in Europe in the early 1980s “led to the first arms reduction in history,” Shearer claimed.

Rich makes this point:

Here’s the difference: Reagan deployed American missiles to Western Europe, and America controlled those missiles. Selling Pershings to Taiwan means they would control those missiles, not us.

Rich is leaving one important point unstated–this would violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty and destroy the entire international framework for controlling the spread of nuclear weapons.

Oh, and start a war with China.

But let’s go to Ronald Reagan and his views on Non-Proliferation–views I happen to strongly agree with:

President Ronald Reagan lists the following basic guidelines for U.S. nuclear non-proliferation policy:

— The U.S. will seek to prevent the spread of nuclear explosives to additional countries as a fundamental national security and foreign policy objective.

— The U.S. will strive to reduce the motivation for acquiring nuclear explosives by working to improve regional and global stability and to promote understanding of the legitimate security concerns of other states.

— The U.S. will continue to support adherence to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and to the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America (Treaty of Tlatelolco) by countries that have not accepted those treaties.

— The U.S. will view a material violation of these treaties or an international safeguards agreement as having profound consequences for international order and U.S. bilateral relations, and also view any nuclear explosion by a non-nuclear-weapon state with grave concern.

— The U.S. will strongly support and continue to work with other nations to strengthen the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to provide for an improved international safeguards regime.

— The U.S. will seek to work more effectively with other countries to forge agreement on measures for combatting the risks of proliferation.

— The U.S. will continue to inhibit the transfer of sensitive nuclear material, equipment and technology, particularly where the danger of proliferation demands, and to seek agreement on requiring IAEA safeguards on all nuclear activities in a non-nuclear-weapon state as a condition for any significant new nuclear supply commitment.

In fact, Reagan brought China into the framework:

1984

1984 — April U.S.-SINO NUCLEAR TRADE PACT The United States signs a nuclear trade pact with China after Peking agrees to join the IAEA and accept IAEA inspection of any exported nuclear equipment and material. The agreement comes into force December 16, 1985.

Ronald Reagan would think Shearer and Schock are dangerous lunatics.

More Than One Political Scientist Has Made This Point

Hilarious 

“What has he done?” Capparelli asked. “I don’t think he does a good job. When you look at the guy, are you proud to say, ‘This is my Congressman?’ The answer is ‘no.’ A lot of people in the neighborhood say he’s a dork. There. I said it. The guy doesn’t know what he’s doing. He’s an awful public speaker, and he’s gone to school his whole life. I take public transportation, the 62H. I don’t think he has ever taken public transportation. He would pee in his pants if he had to take it.”

Lipinski’s response, after I read him the quote, was laughter and then: “That’s a tough one to respond to because it’s not a very professional statement to call someone a dork. I don’t claim to be the greatest public speaker there is, but I’m honest and straightforward. And I have spent hundreds of hours on CTA buses in my life. I’m involved in all kinds of communities in my district.”

Not a very professional statement.

I think McQueary is having fun with this one:

Meanwhile, Lipinski said, he is in the district as much as the congressional schedule allows. Like his father, former U.S. Rep. William Lipinski, Dan Lipinski sleeps on the floor of his congressional office to avoid the expense and hassle of a Washington, D.C., apartment.

“I leave after the last vote on Thursday or Friday and am back in the district,” he said. “I’m working harder than they’ve seen a congressman do in a number of years. I will stand by that. Even the former congressman would agree.”

Of course he would.

Daily Dolt: Aaron Schock, Fighting Non-Proliferation With Proliferation

Aaron Schock is now in the competition for being the stupidest candidate to run this cycle. I’m taking a bigger chunk from the column because it is so amazing so my apologies to Bernie and the Springfield Journal-Register:

I couldn’t attend Schock’s official announcement of his candidacy for Congress, but I did recently receive a copy of his speech, which included a number of foreign policy proposals.

In particular, Schock’s plan to offer nuclear arms to Taiwan if China doesn’t go along with U.S. policy toward Iran seemed odd to me.

An international relations expert I checked with agreed, saying that idea not only shows “incredible naivete,” but, if carried out, probably would lead to war between China and Taiwan.

Shock, a Peoria Republican, at 26, is the youngest member of the Illinois General Assembly. He also is one of the three Republican candidates to replace retiring U.S. Rep. RAY LaHOOD, R-Peoria, in Illinois’ 18th Congressional District. Schock made his intentions official Oct. 27 with events in Peoria Heights and Springfield.

In his speech, he noted that President RONALD REAGAN came to the aid of such rebel groups as the Contras in Nicaragua and the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan. Schock said Reagan also provided freedom movements such as Solidarity in Poland “with CIA training in organizing, and all the equipment necessary to function.”

“Any freedom movement in a totalitarian country faces enormous difficulty in organizing against the unlimited resources of a ruthless state,” Schock said in the speech. “Those freedom movements need help from free nations. In Congress, I will advocate for them.

Schock said he would propose spending the same amount to support “freedom fighters inside Iran” as Iran gives Hezbollah in Lebanon each year

“Let’s turn the tables,” Schock said.

The money could be used to train underground leaders in how to organize and prevent detection, satellite phones, communications, radio broadcasts from nearby countries, “and eventually arms,” Schock said.

“Funding a freedom movement to overthrow the regime will cause massive turmoil in Iran,” he went on. “No American troops will be necessary. We will simply facilitate the people’s overthrow of the Iranian regime, just (as) we did successfully all over Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union, Ethiopia and Nicaragua.

In regard to Taiwan, Schock said the U.S. should put more pressure on China and Russia to go along with tougher economic sanctions against Iran.

“If China continues to be irresponsible about nuclear proliferation in Iran, we should tell them that if they do not care about proliferation — and since they are enablers of it in Iran — that if they don’t change their position, we will sell Pershing nuclear missiles to Taiwan for their defense.”

“Non-proliferation will either be enforced universally or not at all — it is their choice,” Schock continued. “The Chinese will come around, I have no doubt.”

The obvious problem is that if we were to scrap the non-proliferation treaty, as this move would require, there would be no way to force inspection or be able to use multilateral tools to pressure countries to not go nuclear and it would mean that countries like Pakistan and North Korea would be free to engage in proliferation activities. This isn’t just stupid, it’s dangerously stupid.

If Taiwan were to even think seriously about developing a nuclear deterrent, mainland China would attack and we would be forced to enter into World War III or let Taiwan fall.

This is exactly the kind of insanity that Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld were promoting when they kept sending envoys trying to get Taiwan to declare independence, only this would utterly destroy the entire fabric of non-proliferation policy worldwide.

Aaron Schock is a moron and anyone this dangerous must be stopped from getting to Congress.

H/T Rich 

Someone is Not Like the Others

Democrats voting against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) which makes it illegal to discriminate based on sexual orientation who didn’t vote no because it didn’t included Transgendered individuals:

11 Southern Democrats
4 Democrats From Border States (I’m including W. Virginia here)

1 Northern Democrat

John Barrow (D-Georgia)
Marion Berry (D-Arkansas)
Bud Cramer (D-Alabama)
Artur Davis (D-Alabama)
Lincoln Davis (D-Tennessee)
Chet Edwards (D-Texas)
Nick Lampson (D-Texas)
Dan Lipinski (D-Illinois)
Jim Marshall (D-Georgia)
Mike McIntyre (D-North Carolina)
Charlie Melacon (D-Louisiana)
Nick Rahall (D-West Virginia)
Heath Shuler (D-North Carolina)
Ike Skelton (D-Missouri)
John Tanner (D-Tennessee)
Gene Taylor (D-Mississippi)

Why does a Congressman from Illinois vote like a Congressman from Mississippi?

Remember, Illinois passed a state level ENDA already.

It’s Too Divisive

Abortion Rights Money is too divisive according to Laesch

Laesch is making his own campaign more difficult by depriving it of some of its traditional channels of support. Even though Laesch says he is pro-abortion rights, he refuses to accept donations from pro-abortion rights political action committees.

“It’s too divisive,” he said.

Huh? Endorsed by DAPAC–which has decent criteria:

* Are 100% Pro-Choice.

I’m baffled–any suggestions?

Someone Might Tell Dan What He’s Voting On

I know the staff probably tells him what to do leaving him with the impression he’s in charge, but it gets kind of embarrassing when he says this:

Lipinski said he has sided with Bush on only two out of 13 Iraq votes. Plenty of other Democrats did too, he said. The 3rd District has a lot of Reagan Democrats more comfortable with his positions on Iraq and abortion than they would be with Pera’s, Lipinski said.

.Not so much:

Lipinski has voted in favor of Iraq war spending bills five times. If you add those five votes — which took place in May 2005, December 2005, December 2006, September 2006 and May 2007 — together, then you get a total $350 billion in Lipinski-approved war funding. Those five war funding bills were Bush war funding bills.

In terms of a timeline for withdrawal, Lipinski, like Bush, has opposed any movement in this direction.

Lipinski has never voted for, sponsored or co-sponsored anything that approaches a timeline bill. On the contrary, Lipinski has voted twice for resolutions that opposed setting a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.

•    In June 2006, Lipinski voted for a resolution that stated it was not in the national security interests of the U.S. to set an arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment of U.S. Armed Force from Iraq. The resolution (HR 861) also affirmed the U.S. commitment to establishing democracy in Iraq.

•    In July 2005, Lipinski voted against withdrawing “prematurely” from Iraq. HR 2601 stated that it was U.S. policy to pursue a transfer of responsibility to Iraq forces and not withdraw U.S. forces prematurely from Iraq.

•    In May 2007, Lipinski voted against HR 2237, a piece of legislation that required the withdrawal of U.S. troops and contractors in Iraq within 90 days of the bill’s enactment. The withdrawal would have to be completed within 180 days.

•    In September 2007, Lipinski voted for HR 2206, an emergency appropriations bill that lacked language mandating a withdrawal or timeline for withdrawal.