Steinberg is on fire, but not as much as some other people,
But here come the conservatives, toting their boxes of signed petitions, so we can have the question on our ballots next November. Let’s keep out the gays!
Can’t these religious types fixate on something else? Doesn’t their faith have rituals beyond loathing and fearing gays that they could occupy themselves with? Or is mesmerized fixation with man-on-man sex their entire liturgy and holy writ? Because it sure seems that way. No Halsted Street twink, tumbling to the bars with his pals on a Friday night, is obsessed with gay sex to the degree that these bowl haircut fundamentalists pushing their protect marriage act seem to be.
Petey, of course, has well coifed, if receding hair. But they are upset that someone might suggest IFI has an obsession with man on man sex. Who would ever get that impression from Peter “the undercover homosexual lifestyle investigator” LaBarbera?
Don’t we all go to Mr. Leather and Gay Bathhouses to be disgusted by what is going on there…over and over again…
And statements like this don’t help:
“I have monitored the homosexual movement for 15 years, with special focus on its campaign to penetrate schools…Most parents, especially those living near big cities, simply have no clue as to the many ways that the ‘sexual orientation’ agenda works its way into their children’s education.”
(backing the Southern Baptist’s call to investigate the influence of the homo agenda in public schools)— Peter LaBarbera
Keep protesting IFI. How could Steinberg ever suggest such a thing…
Indeed, Vito Spatafore…er…Peter LaBarbara has noticed the way the movement has penetrated our schools. He’s noticed how they’ve thrusted their beliefs, over and over and over again. He’s probably spent a lot of time on his knees, but thy rod and thy staff comfort him.
I’ll stop…but sometimes the low hanging fruit is the juciest…(that pun was completely unintentional – just a happy accident).
How many Illinois Pols would support same sex marriage?
Not civil unions, but marriage as defined now in Illinois except allowing same sex couples?
Wake up, Illinois! If you really want to defend the historical definition of marriage, you need to repeal the 1861 Married Women’s Property Act.