August 2008

The Tribune: The New Sun-Times

Before the Sun-Times got better.
Seriously? The Red-Eye editor?

Oh, and the worst news:

James Warren, managing editor/features, will leave the paper, completing a management exodus that has largely rewritten the Tribune’s masthead in the eight months since real estate magnate Sam Zell took the paper’s parent company private in a debt-heavy $8.2 billion buyout.

Warren is a top notch reporter and editor–Keith Olbermann mentioned his impending departure on Friday.  Just consider Zell the new Alien (AKA Murdoch).

I Demand Illinois NOW Pull It’s Collective Head out of Its Ass

About as effective as their call on Emil Jones to step down.

It didn’t sound like Jones, and now that we know Grabenhofer is part of the fiasco, there’s no reason Emil is even being bothered with this.  You might remember Grabenhofer as the one who doesn’t even know who else voted like Obama on abortion bills, claims Illinois NOW didn’t endorse him because of it, but cannot explain why the endorsed Lisa Madigan who did the same thing. Update:  As Rich points out, it does sound like Jones, actually, I’m just not sure it deserves this kind of coverage.  That said, I’m not sure why it’s getting as much attention as our Governor trying tear apart the Illinois Constitution.

“That was a pretty horrible comment,” said Illinois NOW president Bonnie Grabenhofer, also a Clinton delegate, who issued the demand for Senate President Emil Jones’ resignation.

Feminists who make up the Illinois Clinton delegate contingent at the Democratic National Convention were outraged to learn of today’s exclusive Chicago Sun-Times report about Clinton delegate Delmarie Cobb’s accusation that Jones directed the racially loaded slur at her.

The flap comes at a particularly sensitive time for the Obama campaign, which is slumping in national polls and has struggled to bring Clinton delegates across the country into the fold.

“I’ve never heard anything as awful or as sexist or as racist as to call her that for supporting Hillary,” said Clinton delegate Gay Bruhn, another NOW member in Illinois who called for a public apology from Jones.

What is missing is that Bruhn isn’t just another NOW member, she’s Bonnie’s partner. That would be mentioned in any story referring to a heterosexual couple.  So the story misses the context and treats same sex couples differently.

Governor Jackass Continues General Jackassery

Transparent:

Blagojevich said he will use his amendatory veto power to re-write the legislation to include restrictions on legislative pay raises and lawmakers who have more than one job. At the same time, he signed an executive order that includes the fundraising restrictions in the bill lawmakers sent him. The order, which takes effect in January, also adds restrictions on lawmakers’ fundraising.

“By using the executive order and by applying it to all of us we will have taken the bill that was passed by the legislature and made it better, make it stronger and make it more meaningful and widespread,” Blagojevich said at an afternoon news conference.

The bill, which passed both chambers of the state legislature with overwhelming majorities in May, sought to prohibit supporters who have or want major state contracts worth at least $50,000 from giving to the statewide elected officials who dole out that business.

The governor has said the bill doesn’t go far enough, but critics – including some good government leaders who helped pen the bill — have questioned the governor’s motives. They’ve said the legislation is the best chance to change Illinois’ infamous pay-to-play system of politics.

Utter Bullshit:

“I have waited more than three years to get the Illinois General Assembly to send me a vehicle that I could act on that would reform a system that takes care of itself at the expense of the people,” Blagojevich said in a statement. “We are long overdue for laws that place restrictions on campaign contributions, end the tradition of legislator double dipping, shine a light on legislative pay raises and strengthen disclosure laws.

I’m not sure it even matters if he’s overridden because I think there is a serious question in the courts whether this would even be germane to each other and thus be a different subject–which is limited by the State Constitution.  Moving from campaign finance to salary votes may well not be germane in which case it would be invalidated.

But I doubt we even get there.  His attack on ‘double-dipping’ where those who work for state or city governments and are Lege Members will kill the bill if the amendatory veto isn’t simply overridden.

Now we’ll get the Blagojevich bleating about how the Lege is killing off real reform and how he is taking on the the real powers and how he is the only one who isn’t corrupt all the while he’s laughing because he thinks he has outsmarted everyone else.

The problem?  Emil might have his back, but Halvorson needs this bill to go through and all the better if she gets to give the Governor a whole bunch of hell about it.  They will override his veto instead of killing the bill.  Emil views Blagojevich as a useful tool to fight Madigan, but he’s not putting Halvorson at risk to save the Governor’s sorry ass one more time.

Fritchey only slightly off:

I’m guessing that you AV the bill while everybody is focused on the Democratic Convention, while most of the major political reporters who are familiar with the story are half a country away, and while stories of Barack’s nomination are taking up most of the media space. I’ll even predict a Thursday or even Friday announcement of his action, so as to provide for maximum story burial potential, under the shadow of Barack’s acceptance speech.

Fritchey and Hynes have been pushing this bill for months, but the Governor has sat on his ass ignoring it the entire time. All of sudden, he has decided he will improve it after ignoring those who put it togther.

And notice, even out of his frustration, Fritchey is willing to put forward the Governor’s proposals, just as separate bills.

Giannoulis Blogging

Over at Prairie State Blue.

I am also blessed to be able to address the convention tonight.  Yesterday I went straight from the airport to the convention center for rehearsal.  I had already provided the DNC with my speech and they had it loaded into the teleprompter so that we could rehearse.  We were able to fine tune it a little bit from the podium and I’m pretty excited about how it turned out.  I should be speaking tonight between 6:30pm and 7:00pm central time.

It’s Gephardt

Just got some scuttlebutt, top Gephardt aide Joyce Aboussie has been sent a private plane to join Dick Gephardt for….one can only assume the announcement that Dick Gephardt will be the next Vice President Nominee for the Democratic Party.

UPDATE: If Aboussie is being flown out and ordering staff to be ready for a change, it’s hard to imagine that it is anything, but gearing up for an announcement that he is the VP nominee. He and Aboussie are incredibly close and she is his right hand. Unless this is a bit of disinformation, this is the real deal.

see this and this for the joke if you aren’t a long time reader.

Zorn on the Abortion Votes

He gives the complete time line and talks (has talked) to many of those involved over time.

A fairly big chunk of text, but not much compared to the whole thing which you should go read.

You’d think the March, 2003 Senate committee action by Obama and five other Democrats to deep-six the most recent versions of the “born-alive” bills even after the federal language was added would have played a big role in the debates on this issue during the 2004 campaign.

And you would be wrong.

Stanek didn’t bring it up during an extensive online debate with me on this issue in 2004 (some of which survives here) and my search for contemporary news articles or blog entries on  the SB 1083 amendment issue has so far come up empty.

Indeed, when he left a comment on my blog last Thursday, Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee in Washington D.C. referred to the March, 2003 committee records as “new documents that came to light this week” and “newly released Obama documents.”

Not quite. The committee meeting and the votes were held in public, and the records were there all along for anyone who cared to ask for them. The Associated Press even reported the story briefly the following day and the Illinois Senate staff documented the vote.

But to get get back to the narrative:  In 2005, after Obama was in the U.S. Senate, yet another “born-alive” bill was introduced in the Illinois House–  HB 984, sponsored by Harrisburg Democrat Brandon Phelps.

It was assigned to the House Civil Judiciary Civil Law Committee, chaired by Chicago Democrat John Fritchey.

“I told the proponents that the bill simply wasn’t ever going to get through as long as there was suspicion that it was a back-door way to get at Roe v. Wade or criminalize abortion in Illinois,” Fritchey told me today.

Why wasn’t the Federal “neutrality language” good enough?

Because the Federal bill was widely seen as window dressing; a proclamation more than a law with almost no potential impact on abortion law in the states. At the state level, particularly with the companion bills for punishing doctors, the proposal looked significantly more fraught.

“I told the proponents, `Just give us some extra  language that will establish a comfort level for the pro-choice community,'” said Fritchey.

Here were two provisions Fritchey added:

(d) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to affect existing federal or State law regarding abortion.
(e) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to alter generally accepted medical standards.

“They fought me on that language,” Fritchey said. “They said it wasn’t acceptable. They said the feds didn’t need those kinds of words, why did we need it?”

The question, of  course, is why would the language be a problem if the point of the legislation wasn’t to intimidate doctors from performing abortions?  Look–over there!

The Problem With Stanek’s Entire Argument

Stanek’s claim is that Obama was stopping a bill to outlaw infanticide and that such a law was required in Illinois because of what she claims occurred at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn.  However, the response from the Illinois Attorney General to the claims points out that if such events occurred, those events would already be illegal.

Media Matters makes the point:

The July 2000 letter was a response from Ryan’s office to Concerned Women for America regarding a complaint by nurse Jill Stanek, who claimed that fetuses that were born alive at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Illinois, were abandoned without treatment, including in a soiled utility room. In a letter on Ryan’s letterhead, chief deputy attorney general Carole R. Doris wrote in part:

On December 6, IDPH provided this office with its investigative report and advised us that IDPH’s internal review did not indicate [emphasis added] a violation of the Hospital Licensing Act or the Vital Records Act.

No other allegations or medical evidence to support any statutory violation (including the Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act about which you inquired) were referred to our office by the Department for prosecution.

[…]

While we are deeply respectful of your serious concerns about the practices and methods of abortions at this hospital, we have concluded that there is no basis for legal action by this office against the Hospital or its employees, agents or staff at this time.

From that letter, Freddoso concludes that the state found that “[i]n leaving born babies to die without treatment, Christ Hospital was doing nothing illegal under the laws of Illinois.” But the state’s conclusions regarding the law were reportedly the opposite of what Freddoso claims — IDPH reportedly concluded that if the hospital had done what Stanek alleged, its actions would have been illegal under existing law. (The word “indicate” is in italics above because in his quotation of the letter, Freddoso substitutes the word “include” for the word “indicate.”)

In an August 2004 email discussion with Stanek, Chicago Tribune columnist Eric Zorn quoted IDPH spokesman Tom Shafer stating, apparently in reference to Stanek and another nurse, Allison Baker: “[W]hat they were alleging were violations of existing law. … We took (the allegations) very seriously.” Zorn wrote further: “Shafer told me that the 1999 investigation reviewed logs, personnel files and medical records. It concluded, ‘The allegation that infants were allowed to expire in a utility room could not be substantiated (and) all staff interviewed denied that any infant was ever left alone.’ “

From Zorn’s 2004 blog post:

As you well know, Jill, the Illinois Atty. General’s office, then under abortion foe Jim Ryan, was quite concerned about your allegations and directed the Illinois Dept. of Public Health to conduct a thorough investigation of the claims made by you and Allison Baker.

Why?

“Because what they were alleging were violations of existing law,” IDPH spokesman Tom Shafer told me yesterday. “We took (the allegations) very seriously.”

Shafer told me that the 1999 investigation reviewed logs, personnel files and medical records. It concluded, “The allegation that infants were allowed to expire in a utility room could not be substantiated (and) all staff interviewed denied that any infant was ever left alone.”

Shafer was quick to add that neither he nor the IDPH report concluded that your testimony was untruthful or exaggerated to help advance your anti-abortion views — simply that their investigation did not substantiate the allegations.

In other words, contrary to Freddoso’s claim, the IDPH’s reported position supported Obama’s explanation: Current law already “mandated lifesaving measures for premature babies.” Freddoso writes of Obama’s assertion: “This is not true. Such measures were not already the law in Illinois. Not according to the Department of Public Health. Not according to Attorney General Ryan” [emphasis in original].But the letter does not, as Freddoso claims, assert that “[s]uch measures were not already the law in Illinois.” Nor does the IDPH; indeed, Zorn quoted the IDPH spokesman saying that the actions alleged by Stanek would have violated the law at the time.

The entire argument is bogus.  Infants were protected in Illinois prior to 1999 and after 1999.  No law had to be passed–it was a rather obvious effort to overturn Roe v. Wade.

And people who worked for Jim Ryan should know that.

Today’s Tosser: Illinois Review

If you are really bad at math, you scream about the manliness of your opponent apparently:

The 14th CD’s newly-elected U.S. Congressman Bill Foster is among a group of Democrats’ who’ve been taunting constituents by saying they’re “re-considering” their position on offshore drilling.  Today, House Minority Leader John Boehner challenged the 22 swishy Dems in a letter to “put up or shut up” on the issue.

So the 200,000  barrels a day are going to affect the price of oil?  The United States alone imported 10,031,000 barrels a day in 2007.  We consume 20,680,000 barrels a day in 2007.  We net imported 12,040,000 barrels a day in 2007 meaning the 200,000 barrels a day would only replace 1.7 percent of US imports. Just US Imports.

Of course, it’s a world market and so the effect has to be compared to what it does for the world market and given the daily consumption in 2005 of 83,607,220 the 200,000 barrels a day account for .2 percent (not 2, but .2) of total daily oil consumed.  It’s a pointless exercise.

Being too stupid to make an argument and screaming fag at those who aren’t as dumb as you are is something most people grew out of in elementary school.