Call It A Comeback
More fun with creationists
[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZFG5PKw504" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
I just want to point out the woman towards the beginning is Janet Fogler who put together to the Values Voter Debate.
This is how nutty they are.
Trueman says the Alliance Defense Fund is encouraging citizens to get involved in this fight over this pornography policy. “What we’re going to do is try to get more and more complaints into the military about this policy. Because in justifying this policy by the military what they’ve said [is] they’ve had few complaints from families about the sale of pornography in the military,” he says.
Trueman says sexual harassment and other problems in the military are exacerbated by pornography. He says this new policy, of deeming magazines like Penthouse and Playboy as not sexually explicit, counters common sense.
[kml_flashembed movie="http://youtube.com/v/4dWJgzGUGB8" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
[kml_flashembed movie="http://youtube.com/v/9zwbhAXe5yk" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
On another note, why are there so many loons who think that speaking into the camera in anger on YouTube is interesting or effective? Just wondering.
I’m a little worried about upcoming fights over funding for Iraq, inasmuch as they might distract us from discussing the Moveon ad.
Illinois Review pushes Chris McNeil for the 11th District–the guy who lost to Renee Kosel 58-42 percent.
Because starting with a candidate who has annoyed much of the Party Leadership in the area is always a pathway to success.
She suggests there’s a rift between Dan Rutherford and the Romney campaign because Romney supports a Constitutional Amendment to ban same sex marriage. The funny thing is that Dan knew that when he signed up, so why would there be a rift?
Or is it just another instance of baiting Rutherford on issues that don’t matter to voters?
It strikes me that give Illinois Review another year or two and everyone who writes for them will be so alienated from the Republican Party it’ll be like visiting a Green Party blog.
Friar Frank Pavone from the Terri Schiavo shows up making sure the Circus gets bigger.
If you look at the letter to aldermen, Trombley included those in Aurora who oppose the clinic in his general smear. Whatever these people are, they are one removed from Scheidler and the League. And the answer on whether Scheidler and the League are violent was answered by the Supreme Court 8-1 and 8-0. Trombley took even that false assertion a step further.
This is his public argument, but I’ll assume he wont’ make that argument in court because it’s really silly. The argument Twombley made is:
The activists of the Pro-Life Action League who have been opposing our new facility are headquartered in Aurora and have a well-documented history of advocating violence against both persons and property as well as other related criminal activity.We think you will understand the urgency of our concerns when you consider the following facts about the Pro-Life Action League and its leader, Joe Scheidler.
Scheidler (along with a handful of other anti-abortion leaders) formed PLAN – the Pro-LIfe Action League. Scheidler called PLAN the “pro-life mafia” and proclaimed “a year of pain and fear” for anyone seeking or providing abortion.
After a six-week trial in 1998, a jury in Chicago unanimously found that the Pro-Life Action League Network orchestrated 121 crimes involving acts of threats of force or violence against women’s health facilities that offered abortion. These crimes proven at trial included beating a post-operative ovarian surgery patient over the head with a sign, knocking her unconscious and causing her to bleed from the sutures in her abdomen; seizing a clinic administrator by the throat, choking and bruising her; and slamming a clinic staff member and volunteer against the stairs (sending them to a hospital and causing permanent injuries) and destroying medications and equipment. Joe Scheidler personally praised the individuals who carried out some of these misdeeds, even taking credit for them….
Claiming that is libelous is silly. The court throwing out the conviction doesn’t say they weren’t tied to the violence, it says the law didn’t cover non-commercial action. The Court made a reasonable reading of the law, but it hardly leads one to conclude that there isn’t a strange coincidence of Joe Scheidler showing up and violence following.
Bill Foster wants you to fill the beaker:
ArchPundit