She suggests there’s a rift between Dan Rutherford and the Romney campaign because Romney supports a Constitutional Amendment to ban same sex marriage. The funny thing is that Dan knew that when he signed up, so why would there be a rift?
Or is it just another instance of baiting Rutherford on issues that don’t matter to voters?
It strikes me that give Illinois Review another year or two and everyone who writes for them will be so alienated from the Republican Party it’ll be like visiting a Green Party blog.
There’s a Green Party blog?
(I kid the Greens. I know a few. Decent folks.)