He’s Not a Rocket Scientist–He’s Smarter!
A very interesting candidate has jumped in Illinois 14–a particle physicist.
Call It A Comeback
A very interesting candidate has jumped in Illinois 14–a particle physicist.
Dear Friend,
Today, I announce my candidacy for the United States House of Representatives from the Tenth District of Illinois.
I am running for Congress because I believe that as a country, we have lost our way. On issues both at home and abroad, we have seen poor leadership, gross mismanagement, and downright neglect. That needs to change. I believe that our current representative hasn’t shown the independence or good judgment to get us back on track. I want to help get government working again.
Government should be focused on expanding opportunities for more Americans, meeting our responsibilities, and strengthening our communities. One of our most urgent needs is bringing a responsible end to Iraq as quickly as possible. But we must also address long neglected needs such as our broken healthcare system and overdependence on oil. Abroad, I am absolutely committed to the safety and security of Israel; a key partner in our fight against terrorism. And I believe that to reduce terrorism we must not just fight the terrorists-but also fight the conditions and ideas that produce them.
The differences between me and Congressman Kirk are clear. He has supported President Bush’s agenda and I do not. Congressional Quarterly reports that he has voted with the President almost 90 percent of the time. Since the last election he has tried to reverse some of those key votes. He even went to the White House, as many papers reported, to tell President Bush that the war was hurting his reelection prospects. I couldn’t disagree more with this kind of leadership. Congressman Kirk is putting politics before policy. On issues as critical as these we must have the courage of our convictions. His votes should be driven by what he feels is right, not what he feels is expedient.
We earned a lot of respect with our last campaign. In 2008 we will finish the job, and begin the process of bringing the Tenth District the independent leadership it deserves.
I am pleased to have the support of State Senator Terry Link, State Senator Susan Garrett, State Senator Jeffrey Schoenberg, State Representative Elaine Nekritz, State Representative Eddie Washington, State Representative Julie Hamos and State Representative Kathy Ryg.
I invite you to join me in our campaign to strengthen our communities and expand opportunity for all Americans. Please visit my website to view our announcement video, read the press release, sign-up to volunteer or make a secure online contribution.
Apparently we are ruled by a giant child. And let me make clear, I think the GRT was a good idea and the health care plan was generally doable from a policy sense, though the politics were bad.
I’d still argue the GRT is the best solution available–I would argue that an income tax change should be to make it progressive first and then figure out the rate. Overall the GRT was probably the best solution. It’s now dead.
The strategy for everyone at this point should be to figure out a budget for this year and build up good relationships so a serious deal can be reached next year to deal with long term financial problems. Just the opposite is happening endangering possible future deals.
Embedding isn't working so go here
One of the criticisms of Obama is that he is an institutionalist. I’m baffled by the complaint when we see what happens when a President treats democratic institutions as speed bumps.
I’ll go back to my favorite example–that of Hubert Humprey who was utterly useless as the firebrand speaking truth to power in the Senate until he became an institutionalist and abided by the norms of the Senate. He became far more effective and passed several civil rights bills.
Arguing Obama should have shouted louder says nothing about whether such a strategy would be effective. Given others were shouting loudly, I’m not sure how this would have been effective. Confusing loud for effective is a common mistake amongst many activists.
Steve at Beachwood Reporter responded to AM with a post that makes some good posts, but also makes serious mistakes.
He is campaigning as a change agent with no record of being one; as an anti-war candidate who kept his mouth shut when he had a national stage
And then a reference to Lieberman. The problem here is that there is no argument as to what shouting louder would accomplish. With less than a year in the US Senate he offered up a fairly detailed plan regarding reducing US troops and said the Iraq mission had failed. That’s significant. He also was the guy who opposed the war when everyone said it was a bad idea to oppose it. That’s not keeping one’s mouth shut, that’s people who weren’t paying attention claiming their lack of attention means he kept his mouth shut. He’s one of the few US Senators to attend an anti-Iraq war rally for that matter.
It’s beyond me how anyone can honestly look at Obama and see his fictionalized memoir,
Which was written when no one was likely to read it and clearly states that people are fictionalized. Again, what’s the scandal other than adding a laundry list to convince people he’s done horrible things?
phone call to Tony Rezko to help him buy that house
Which is factually incorrect. Every newspaper that has researched it has found that the properties were separately listed and that Obama had the highest bid on the house. The facts suggest that the sale itself was very clean–the questions arise on the buying of the strip of land–even if Obama paid above market value.
not putting his stock in a blind trust while posing as the champion of ethics legislation,
It’s unclear what the complaint here is. Is it that he created an ineffective blind trust in trying to create a new way of doing it or that he isn’t using a blind trust? There is no requirement for a blind trust for the US Senate. He ended the attempt at a different type of blind trust after it failed. What’s the scandal?
his mentors being Emil Jones, Rezko, and Joe Lieberman,
And Paul Simon asked for the elder Daley’s blessing. Lieberman is overblown as there appears to be no affect on Obama’s policies and it was an institutional mentor. I know it’s popular to jump on Jones for being a patronage pol–which he is–but he’s also a black man who is President of the Illinois Senate and on policy he’s progressive. Rezko was a funder, not a mentor. It’s simply throwing his name in again.
his embrace of Dorothy Tillman and Todd Stroger,
And you get this upset when Durbin backs Jerry Costello? Yeah. Thought not.
his reputation in Springfield for being lazy and aloof,
Aloof early on, yes. Lazy no. He was considered uppity by many because he did try to much. And he introduced key bills on the minimum wage, EITC, and public funding of judicial elections.
his lackluster record as a U.S. senator
This is just stupid:
Such a lightweight taking on Nuclear Non-Proliferation.
, including keeping his mouth shut about the war,
Which Obama didn’t do.
voting for the Mexican fence
The fence is dumb, but less dumb than corn based ethanol.
and against the credit card interest cap,
Which was introduced by one of the laziest Senators in the last quarter century who never gathered any information about what the bill would impact. Obama would vote for a bill that was actually researched.
I like Steve and I think he’s one of the better critics of Obama, but as I may not see all the faults, Steve tends to see more than there are.
He’s running for the State House against Beth Coulson–go help out Daniel Biss
Rezko crap keeps streaming in.
My advice in December was to get it all out and be more than forthcoming beyond what the press expects. Apparently someone thought that wasn’t a good idea and they keep getting to talk about Rezko.
Obama’s Campaign has a major fuck-up. The key to understanding the Senator from Punjab line is in Rich’s comments and posts:
Whoever ordered this racist/xenophobic hit on Clinton needs to be fired. Right away. And I don’t mean the person who wrote it. From what I understand, the first draft was much more acceptable, but it was rejected and sent back with a demand that it be infinitely tougher. If the author is fired and the person who ordered the rewrite is not, then Obama is a huge hypocrite. The full memo is here.
There is certainly no record of over-the-top racial or xenophobic smears by Obama himself, but there is with at least one guy on his staff, who my sources say was the one who rejected the original Punjab piece and then ordered it massively toughened up.
More here, here and here. That ought to take care of your Macaca qualms. If they had called her “Hillary (D-Harlem)” or “Hillary (D-Chinatown)” it would have been no different, regardless of any mild throwaway joke she might have made about herself. The fact that Punjab has been used as an ethnic/racial slur just makes it worse, regardless of the intent.
Rich seems to be saying it was Robert Gibbs. I hope not. I like Robert and he’s generally a good guy, though he does get a bit too harsh in races. However, assuming Rich has his reporting correct, and he usually does, the piece was sent back to toughen it up and Rich seems to be pointing that it was Gibbs who ordered that. Regardless of who did, the person who did needs to be fired. It’s not what the Obama campaign is supposed to be about.
I got you babe…
I swear there was a lot of budget talk before I disappeared for a while.
I got you babe….