2006

Hand Feeding the Press

It isn’t a spokespersons fault when a reporter skips figuring out the facts of a story, but you’d think that a quick Lexis search to figure out the whole story might be reasonable.

Roskam is attempting to claim that he really isn’t very close to Tom DeLay because he only worked for him 20 years ago and for about 8 months. That’s a reasonable claim if that were all there was to the relationship.

Unfortunately Marni Pyke at Daily Herald does a piss poor he said she said story.

The reality behind Roskam and DeLay is that they’ve had an ongoing relationship over the years. In the 1998 race for IL-13 there was this little tidbit from the Trib:

Word on Capitol Hill is that ideological conservative state Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Naperville) is getting behind-the-scenes help in his six-way Republican congressional primary battle from GOP House Whip Tom DeLay of Texas.

DeLay is the arch-conservative former pest-control service operator whose former profession and aggressive attacks on federal regulation of almost any type, including environmental laws, has earned him the nickname “The Exterminator.”

A top aide to DeLay has been calling around to some big conservative backers suggesting they “take a look at” (i.e., send money to) Roskam, said a congressional source.

Even better, in an April Sun-Times piece, Roskam said the following about DeLay

But state Sen. Peter Roskam, who worked for DeLay 20 years ago, voiced support.

“Trotting out some of … these old accusations that are two and three and four years old is a little bit tiresome,” Roskam said. “I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt.”

…..

Roskam, 43, is a lawyer who lives in Wheaton. He worked as an aide to DeLay in 1985 and part of 1986, but said he has “not had any contact with him essentially for 20 years.”

“I think everybody agrees that he’s one of the most effective legislators in Washington, D.C.,” Roskam said. “Knowing what I know now about what Tom DeLay’s been accused of, my attitude would be to support him.”

The obvious question given Tom DeLay is under indictment and clearly under investigation for his ties to Abramoff, does Roskam still support him? He clearly did 10 days before DeLay was indicted when DeLay hosted a fundraiser for a guy he hadn’t had any contact with essentially for 20 years. On top of that, Roskam received a $1,000 donation from ARMPAC (DeLay’s federal PAC) in 1998. I tend to think that’s more than no contact. Not many folks just hand me $1000 to run for office in a primary.

Secondly, why not donate that $1000 to charity? Obviously it was in 1998, but why not make the symbolic gesture if Roskam is pushing for ethics reform.

Better yet, why hasn’t the press got him on record concerning the DeLay rule change in the Republican caucus that would have allowed DeLay to continue serving under state indictment? Out of 10 Illinois Members of Congress at the time, only two supported it–Weller and Hastert. How would Roskam have voted?

Roskam’s ties to the finance scandals aren’t just to DeLay.

In the Sun-Times today:

“I think the Duckworth campaign is really stretched and desperate in trying to make this a close association,” Roskam said.

If you want to quibble over the word mentor, fine. However, Roskam has a long history of support from DeLay and has tried to hide that history.

Oh, and let’s not bring up the residency issue. From the 1998 race:

Sixty percent of the 13th Congressional District is in southern DuPage County. Part of southwestern Cook County and northern Will County are in the district. Roskam, whose state legislative district is mostly in Hyde’s congressional district but includes some of Fawell’s, lives outside the district but would move if nominated for the congressional seat.

Petey’s Scatting Around

Fortunately, I’m not the only one who finds Peter Labarbera, undercover homosexual investigator, hilarious. Pam’s Blend takes us into Petey’s work at the War On Christian’s Conference. She refers back to this Salon article (weird advertising thingy to get in). Oh, boy, it’s at the Omni Shoreham–I just stayed there on my last trip to DC.

greatest frustration has been our side’s inability to make homosexual behavior an issue in the public’s mind.” In order to inspire the kind of revulsion he wants to see more of, he read from a posting on a gay message board: “Hey guys, I know this is kind of gross and all, but I was wondering if I’m the only one. I’m usually the bottom in my relationship with my boyfriend. After having been the receptive partner in anal sex it’s only a few hours before I start to experience diarrhea … it really stinks, because I really like sex, duh, but it takes the fun out of it when I know I’ll be tied to the bathroom for the next day.”

“I don’t think so-called GLBT teens are told anything like this” by their school counselors, LaBarbera said. “We need to find ways to bring shame back to those who are practicing and advocating homosexual behavior.”

Other geniuses at the conference include Rod Parsley who is the Stupidist Fucking Man on the Planet–yes even dumber than Doug Feith. His organization collects money to buy slaves’ freedom in Africa.

Anyone understand why that’s just sort of a problem?

End of the Fundraising Quarter

If you have a favorite candidate, give what you can.

Let’s go with a good consensus pick here,

John Pavich

I also recommend Bean, Duckworth, and Seals.

If you want to feel subversive, Join the Nedrenaline. It’s not that he’s moderate, it’s not that he supported the war, it’s that the good Senator Lieberman gets a lot more worked up about a blowjob than he does about an administration that routinely ignores the balance of power and the individual rights.

And finally, a guy I think proves that not playing well with others is a good thing, Jim Webb for US Senate in Virginia

Let’s Start the Cattle Call

Blogs never are in good taste so after wishing Congressman Evans well, I’m thinking

John Sullivan (I can recycle some posts–different Sullivan)
Mike Jacobs

Ah hell, that District covers such a weird area, I have a hard time figuring out who is in and who is out of it.

Minor thing–despite crossing over media markets, it’s relatively cheap and the Quad Cities area will now have two targeted races for the DCCC to work with in the area since IA-1 is also a hot race.

First person to say Mangieri, gets ejected. After that Treasurer campaign, he’s pretty much demonstrated he’s not up for a tough race.

Evans Retiring

I’m glad to hear it. Lane has served admirably, but it was clear this winter that he was going to have a hard time keeping up as a Congressman. It’s far better to leave on your own terms. I hope this will also give him time to enjoy himself and his family.

It is odd timing given the primary just passed, but obviously this is a far different situation than Lipinski–in this case it appears that Evans is dropping out after actually hoping to run again. Democrats will be able to appoint a candidate in his place.

There will be a scramble given the weird nature of the District and the areas it covers all along the Western border of Illinois and how it takes in Decatur and Springfield.

The District leans Democratic at about 53% so it leans Democratic, but it is competitive.

Via Rich

I Can’t Believe They Took the Bait

I can’t believe that one worked–the seat belt issue is hysterical because the best way to handle is just to say it is settled instead of actually getting into a debate over the issue.

11th Hour and Abelog cover the issue. Jim gets the political handling correct, but the reason the issue was raised is being missed.

Seat belt laws had very strong opponents when they were passed, but now that they are the law, they are pretty non-controversial. I doubt there would be a strong movement to repeal them because there is no real interest other than angry cranks (who disproportionately make up talk radio). Where the issue fits for the Blagojevich campaign isn’t a full blown debate, but taking a safety issue that suburban women think is a good idea and putting Topinka on the spot. It won’t turn a vote, but it does start a process the Blagojevich camp wants to start–the questioning of her values. People don’t vote on a laundry list for the most part, most vote on a vague sense of who shares their values and by beginning to question whether Topinka’s values match that of most suburban women, the process is started.

Don’t get me wrong, it might not work, but as far as a first salvo, Democrats got the upperhand as Topinka’s press people seem to be in primary mode worrying about the base and not the swing voters.

Not so Funny

Greg points out that hazing in the Lege can go too far. Way tooooo far….

Not funny and damn demeaning. If Dawn Clark Netsch was around she wouldn’t have ruled it just out of order, she’d have kicked Hendon’s ass. Mark Rhoads makes a very good point in Greg’s post. I don’t mind a bit of silliness, but treating women legislators as sex objects is so far over the line of acceptable behavior, I’ll stop trying to complain about it before I end up writing a string of cliches.

Meeks-Oberweis

Really, I like Meeks in many ways, but don’t make me have that much fun at your expense.

Rich pointed out that Meeks’ views on guns would alienate him from social conservatives. I’m not sure that’s the biggest issue however.

There is a odd, but somewhat possible alliance between James Meeks and many social conservatives on abortion and gay marriage. Progressives all too often give a pass to African-Americans willing to scapegoat gays and lesbians, however, Meeks’ big weakness is on taxes which is the central point of his campaign. He wants to (I believe rightly) pass a tax swap which would raise income taxes and at least temporarily lower property taxes.

While social conservatism has run over the once proud Illinois Republican Party, taxes are still a bedrock issue on which conservatives will not defect. Any ground he might pick up will be lost to the tax position and then to Latinos who will not and should not tolerate Jim Oberweis.

Frankly, It’s Happened in Much Worse Situations

Cegelis refuses to endores Duckworth. If that’s Christine’s take, it’s Christines take (and YDD, I do owe you an apology–I was mistaken)

As I’ve expressed many times, there have been much worse primaries. This isn’t typical, but it’s certainly not uncommon. At this point, anyone who wants to fight over it can…others should find a campaign they can work for whether it’s Duckworth or another campaign.