2005

Power Doesn’t Do Much Good Without A Cause

And the Speaker found a good one this year. Rich Miller does a good rundown on the Speaker’s effort to reign in predatory lenders.

The Speaker is a creature of what he is–political power. He’s good at using it and good at generally doing things that Democrats approve, though he seldom uses it for an all out progressive bill. One should always be skeptical of his motives (other than keeping the majority), but there’s also a human underneath that scowl, somewhere, and in this case, the human brought a great victory for poor home owners who have been preyed upon for too long by predatory lenders. The bill essentially forces an area hit hard by predatory lending to have the mortgages reviewed by the State of Illinois. While that will slow down some transactions, it will also mean that areas hit hard will have someone to watch for contracts that seek to nickel and dime individuals out of their homes through a process of fees that never end.

More from Crane’s here

Having done some work related to this, consumer counseling is one of the more effective means of teaching citizens to know what to look for and how to budget for housing costs.

The Comeback

While many see the imminent demise of Blagojevich as done, he’s got some powerful cards still to play. The reason Topinka is such a strong challenger is that she is the only Republican he can’t paint into a corner on issues such as abortion rights and other social issues. LaHood falls into a second category of someone who is hard to hit, but only because he comes off as folksy.

The rest of the Republican field has attached itself ot a social conservatism that doesn’t play well with swing voters. With Democrats having about a 10% or more advantage in ID in Illinois, those swing voters are already skewed towards Democratic positions.

That’s why the order to dispense birth control at pharmacies that carry such pharmaceuticals. His position has 80% support nationwide, yet in a primary social conservatives are going to have a hard time not siding with those opposed to the rule because of the influence of pro-life groups in the primary. Obviously Judy is exempt given she is pro-choice, but she already lost that vote and is counting on the others to split social conservatives in a divided primary.

With loons comparing him to Slobodan Milosevich, he gets three or four days of attacking his opponent for not denouncing such language when the group backs the inevitable opponent’s positive press from Pharmacists for Life. Oh, and his opponents will be practicing politics as usual, you know, the politics he came to change.

On cultural issues other than abortion he has taken positions that many swing voters are concerned about including violence and sex in video games. While on the internet it gets howls of protest, it’s a smart move politically. Whether it does any good or not, he gets to get up and tell moms that he tried to shield their children from gratuitous sex and violence and give a lecture about responsibility. Sure, the press rolls their eyes, but so what? They’ve been rolling their at him for 2 years (and so have I). He’s against gay marriage, but signed landmark legislation to protect gays and lesbians from discrimination–a position that has 60%+ support in the general public.

So he has taken strong positions on choice–positions that are supported more than just by the core pro-choice audience and he has taken strong positions on violence and sex in the culture that suburban women consistently point to as one of the things that they feel most worried about with their children so a crusading social conservative doesn’t get any traction.

But, but…what about the budget? Yeah, what about it? He hasn’t raised general taxes. He has raised specific taxes that most people don’t feel directly. He has gimmicked the budget, but who actually follows budget negotiations? People who read blogs, that’s who and there just aren’t that many out there.

He has also held his hand out to African-Americans and Latinos after a shaky start and seems to have the Jackson’s backing and in his recent letter Guitierrez signs on as well as Rush.

If the election is one of social issues, Rod Blagojevich is a two term Governor and while gritting their teeth, the press writes stories about him being the Comeback Kid and who knows what else is possible.

The wild cards out there are three. One, how much scandal is out there. Because there are so many scandals in Illinois, who to blame might end up at his feet or it might end up diffuse and thrown on the system as a whole. George Ryan’s trial is likely to be going on during next election and while many social conservatives view Ryan as a RINO, he’s a Republican to the average voter and under those circumstances, it’ll be hard to tar Blagojevich. If, however, the press keeps finding scandals like the cleaning contract, the Governor is in trouble, but if it stops now, the blunders fall from the public mind while others replace him and in that case, his break from Mell may even help him.

The second wildcard is his mouth. How do we know this? Testicularvirility.com was taken up within 48 hours of him saying it and done through a hidden registration process so no one knows who did it, but it might be the same folks who registered Blagorgeous.com. Just guessing because the other likely candidate would probable tell us if he did.

Third, does the act just wear thin. The problem with this is the US Senate is full of people who are thought to be shameless media whores. Hell, the Dems nominated a guy for President with the nickname LiveShot in Boston because he’ll show up anywhere for a Liveshot on the nightly news.

The Republican primary is set up to be a fight over who can be the most holy. Topinka goes left and hopes for the party not to coalesce around a single social conservative. If she wins, Blagojevich runs against the old ways attempting to be an outsider and I figure it’s 50-50 who wins.

If LaHood takes it, 60-40 odds (not percentages) for Blagojevich as he backs LaHood into uncomfortable positions and exploits conservative distrust over LaHood attacking Fitzgerald. Rauschenberger is a wild card because he has to raise cash, but also is tied to Keyes. G-Rod takes the rest of the field.

Right now the Republican primary is the best thing Rod Blagojevich has going for him. And the frightening thing is that he and his political people know it and have set themselves up to win that fight.

Apparently Declaring It’s Okay Makes it So

In a bizarre article about the media buys for the State Lottery:

Blagojevich’s audit of his agency covered a period from Sept. 1, 2003 to Nov. 30, 2004, and also found that R.J. Dale failed to provide audited financial statements, canceled checks and bank data.

Clifton Gunderson reported, “Due to the insufficient reliable documentation and reconciliations of R.J. Dale’s records, we have not been able to complete the objectives of this engagement.”

Nevertheless, the auditors concluded that based on the limited documents, they “did not find evidence of misuse or waste of the Department of Revenue funds regarding the media purchasing.”

R.J. Dale officials could not be reached for comment, but Robert J. Dale has said his firm has done nothing wrong, and there were no discrepancies in the work it did for the state.

I imagine the IRS reads the paper and will be paying a visit very soon to R.J. Dale.

The Slumlord Candidate

Most people with a clue would have sold the damn investment or brought in at least a new management team, but no, Ron Gidwitz running on cash infused stupidity thought he could run for Governor and not get called on a scandal involving a low income housing project he is partial owner of and majority owner of the management company that ‘maintains’ the property.

The Joliet Herald News lays down a slapdown that anyone with shame would take as a signal to get out of the race. Fortunately for political humor, Gidwitz has oodles of cash and virtually no shame. So he’ll stick around for a bit until he gets beat up for too long and then disappears never to be seen again except in federal court being sued by Joliet area mayors and residents. Read the whole thing, but it’s harsh:

“We are the laughing stock of the nation. People think of Chicago and they think about two things: the Roaring ’20s and what’s going on now,” Gidwitz said. “We need to make state government, as a whole, open.”

These promises ring hollow around here. Evergreen Terrace has been fiscal drain on Joliet for years, eating up policing money and hampering development of the St. John’s Parish area.

As far as openness, both the owners and Illinois Housing Development Authority have rebuffed efforts by both The Herald News and the city to release the names of the facility’s investors.

Before he runs for governor on a platform of fiscal responsibility and transparency, Gidwitz needs to get his own house, er, tenement, in order.

More Gidwitz fun to come.

Even a Kind word for Weller

While I’ll be back at attacking Weller for marrying into a genocidal dictator’s family and ignoring the moral implications of such a move soon, even Jerry Weller hasn’t stood still for the conditions at the Evergreen Terrace Housing Complex in Joliet.

From October 20, 2003 in Crain’s:

Urban eyesore or essential shelter? That’s the question dividing Joliet and pitting a group that includes Illinois GOP stalwart Ronald Gidwitz against federal forces ranging from U.S. Rep. Jerry Weller to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Mel Martinez.

At issue is the future of Evergreen Terrace, a low-income housing complex part-owned by former Helene Curtis Industries Inc. CEO Mr. Gidwitz, that Joliet officials contend has become a cesspool of crime, filth and safety violations.

With some apparent arm-twisting from Rep. Weller, R-Morris, Joliet city officials were able to persuade Mr. Martinez last month to abruptly scuttle the renewal of federal rent subsidies and loan guarantees for Evergreen Terrace-a move that essentially could force the owners to sell or default on the mortgage.

City officials and Mr. Weller insist that Chicago-based real estate management firm Burnham Cos., whose owners also include Mr. Gidwitz, have allowed Evergreen Terrace to deteriorate beyond repair. The city wants to relocate the residents to other apartments and raze the 356-unit complex.

Mr. Gidwitz, Burnham executives and state housing administrators say the accusations are exaggerated. They’re determined to reverse Mr. Martinez’s order, insisting that the city’s plan for moving Evergreen’s 500 residents to alternative low-income housing is unworkable.

Reputations on the line

They accuse city officials and Mr. Weller of conducting a smear campaign against Burnham and Evergreen Terrace as part of a strategy to force low-income minority residents from areas near the Des Plaines River that have attractive redevelopment potential.

”Unfortunately, the city officials have decided they don’t want this development in the city,” says Mr. Gidwitz, a member and former chairman of the State Board of Education. ”We manage properties at a high quality. We don’t cut corners. We don’t treat people badly.”

At stake in the bitter dispute are the reputations of the civic-minded Mr. Gidwitz and Mr. Weller, whose influence as a suburban power broker is expanding with Will County’s growing population.

Allied with Mr. Weller is U.S. Sen. Peter Fitzgerald, R-Ill., who also participated in the meeting last month with Joliet officials and Mr. Martinez. Meanwhile, Evergreen’s managers have low-income housing advocates and the Illinois Housing Development Authority on their side.

From the AP October 29, 2003

Recounting an Oct. 9 tour, Fitzgerald argued in a letter sent to Martinez late Tuesday that the city of Joliet should be allowed to redevelop the property and place residents in better and safer living arrangements.

“In my opinion, the living conditions at Evergreen Terrace are inhumane,” the Illinois Republican said.

Fitzgerald said was overpowered by the smell of urine, saw exposed wiring and broken elevators, mail boxes and door locks, and heard from residents about problems ranging from rodents to rampant crime and drug traffic.

And while Gidwitz is trying to minimize his involvement:

Halperin said the owners of Evergreen Terrace are several dozen people from across the nation, including prominent GOP contributor Ronald Gidwitz, a member of the State Board of Education, and the Gidwitz family, who hold about a 2 percent share. Gidwitz and his family are also majority owners of Burnham Management, according to Halperin.

Emphasis mine.

Salvi Urged to Run to Bolster the Right Wing of the Republican Party

Todd Akin (R-Evilution land) and Pence (IN-R) are pushing Al Salvi to get into the 8th District Republican primary to ensure the district goes to a Republican who is conservative enough.

Interestingly, Akin himself is facing a primary challenge by an African-American Republican from St. Charles, Sherman Parker.

Spokesmen for Pence and Akin confirmed that their bosses had spoken with Salvi in the past few months but said those conversations did not amount to endorsements.

Pence spokesman Matt Lloyd indicated that Pence is trying to bolster his party?s right wing. ?I think certainly, as RSC chairman, Congressman Pence wants to see more conservative members in the Congress. So things like the House Conservatives Fund are set up to help move toward that end.?

The fund was formerly called the Conservative Action Team PAC, or CAT PAC, and was run by Rep. John Doolittle (R-Calif.), Lloyd said.

A Republican source close to the Republican Study Committee suggested the Salvi phone conversations with Pence, Akin and other members were organized by the RSC.

In recent months, the group of 100-plus conservatives ? which Pence has called ?the majority of the majority? ? has confronted House GOP leaders over the budget and sought to play a more prominent role in shaping the Republican agenda.

Apparently that whole 50% +1 vote stategery is all wrong for winning elections. heh.

Mike Madigan Was Arrogant. I’m shocked, shocked I tell you.

In the category of like he gives a rat’s ass:

This will be interesting only to IL pols:

IL Speaker of the House Michael Madigan was subpoenaed June 17 to give a deposition on what part he played, if any (ha), to stop the Illinois Choose Life license plate legislation last year.

(Side note: Workers at Madigan’s law office told the process server he wasn’t in. But she smelled a rat and barged into his inner sanctum where – voila! – she spotted him and served him. She said he was unpleasant. Actually, she said he was “arrogant.”)

Madigan’s daughter, AG Lisa, is fighting the subpoena.

Another legislator who shall remain nameless for the moment is presently dodging and weaving the server.

“arrogant”

Few things are more annoying than leaving it at this. My guess is the server got in the room, Madigan looked up annoyed (pretty much the same face he always uses with the press), was served, stared at the person and looked back down as the server tried to make uncomfortable discussion about being successful. But instead we don’t get the funny details. We get a cheerleading post about the most dreadfully irrelevant issue to ever hit Illinois politics since Chris Lauzen debated whether he really was a CPA or not.

Via Capitol Fax

Nukem Harvey

And the rest of the story…

Austin Mayor picked it up and Zorn gets the full text:

After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Winston Churchill said that the American people?he said, the American people, he said, and this is a direct quote, ?We didn?t come this far because we are made of sugar candy.?

That was his response to the attack on Pearl Harbor. That we didn?t come this far because we are made of sugar candy.

And that reminder was taken seriously. And we proceeded to develop and deliver the bomb, even though roughly 150,000 men, women and children perished in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. With a single blow, World War II was over.

Following New York, Sept. 11, Winston Churchill was not here to remind us that we didn?t come this far because we?re made of sugar candy.

So, following the New York disaster, we mustered our humanity.

We gave old pals a pass, even though men and money from Saudi Arabia were largely responsible for the devastation of New York and Pennsylvania and our Pentagon.

We called Saudi Arabians our partners against terrorism and we sent men with rifles into Afghanistan and Iraq, and we kept our best weapons in our silos.

Even now we?re standing there dying, daring to do nothing decisive, because we?ve declared ourselves to be better than our terrorist enemies — more moral, more civilized.

Our image is at stake, we insist.

But we didn?t come this far because we?re made of sugar candy.

Once upon a time, we elbowed our way onto and into this continent by giving small pox infected blankets to native Americans.

Yes, that was biological warfare!
And we used every other weapon we could get our hands on to grab this land from whomever. And we grew prosperous.

And, yes, we greased the skids with the sweat of slaves.

And so it goes with most nation states, which, feeling guilty about their savage pasts, eventually civilize themselves out of business and wind up invaded, and ultimately dominated by the lean, hungry and up and coming who are not made of sugar candy.

Biological weapons–the ROAD TO PROSPERITY!

And that, folks, should be the end of the rest of the story.