2004

Can You Say Indictment

Mr. DeLay had better live up to his last name because right now Ronnie Earle, Travis County District Attorney (Austin), is preparing to indict a whole bunch of folks around the Majority Leader and with the new Washington Post find of this morning, he’ll might just have enough for DeLay himself.

DeLay requested that the new donation come from “a combination of corporate and personal money from Enron’s executives,” with the understanding that it would be partly spent on “the redistricting effort in Texas,” said the e-mail to Kenneth L. Lay from lobbyists Rick Shapiro and Linda Robertson.

The e-mail, which surfaced in a subsequent federal probe of Houston-based Enron, is one of at least a dozen documents obtained by The Washington Post that show DeLay and his associates directed money from corporations and Washington lobbyists to Republican campaign coffers in Texas in 2001 and 2002 as part of a plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts.

DeLay’s fundraising efforts helped produce a stunning political success. Republicans took control of the Texas House for the first time in 130 years, Texas congressional districts were redrawn to send more Republican lawmakers to Washington, and DeLay — now the House majority leader — is more likely to retain his powerful post after the November election, according to political experts.

But DeLay and his colleagues also face serious legal challenges: Texas law bars corporate financing of state legislature campaigns, and a Texas criminal prosecutor is in the 20th month of digging through records of the fundraising, looking at possible violations of at least three statutes. A parallel lawsuit, also in the midst of discovery, is seeking $1.5 million in damages from DeLay’s aides and one of his political action committees — Texans for a Republican Majority (TRMPAC) — on behalf of four defeated Democratic lawmakers.

DeLay has not been named as a target of the investigation. The prosecutor has said he is focused on the activities of political action committees linked to DeLay and the redistricting effort. But officials in the prosecutor’s office say anyone involved in raising, collecting or spending the corporate money, who also knew of its intended use in Texas elections, is vulnerable.

Documents unearthed in the probe make clear that DeLay was central to creating and overseeing the fundraising. What the prosecutors are still assessing is who knew about the day-to-day operations of TRMPAC and how its money was used to benefit Texas House candidates.

Texas, much like Illinois, doesn’t have many campaign finance rules, but the ironclad one is no corporate money. If these documents are solid, DeLay is going to be indicted and is likely going to prison. A Texax prison at that. This is a state case.

To understand why a local DA is at the center of this, one has to understand that the Texas law regarding public corruption gives the Travis County DA authority over public corruption cases statewide. The reason is that as the State Capitol, Austin was a natural place to give the authority. Of course, Ronnie Earle is from the most liberal place in Austin so this raised the cackles of Texas Republicans as he pursued an investigation into the state redistricting efforts and the finances surrounding Republicans taking both chambers of the Texas Lege.

Republicans have threatened to defund the Travis County public corruption department that is state funded and potentially reduce Earle’s authority.

If anyone is confused about why all this effort by DeLay, remember the mid-decade redistricting the Texas Lege pulled off and his K-Street effort that seeks to have Republicans hired in key lobbying jobs. DeLay sees his role as the guy to deliver a permanent Republican majority.

The Stakeholder is all over this story.

In a little bit, look for updates as to how GOPers from Illinois are voting with DeLay–let’s just ask the question, why is a Republican Congressman from Illinois voting like a Republican Congressman from Texas?

UPDATE:

Jerry Weller-Tom Delay 94% agreement. Where do they differ? On a couple regional transportation bills and procedural motions

Phil Crane–Tom Delay 95%. Where dod they differ? On a couple regional transportation bills and one less procedural motions.

Sugarland Texas has the same values as Lake County and Central Illinois? I don’t think so.

There were no significant policy differences, but instead the differences were over procedure and pork in a given area according to Congressional Quarterly.

That said, the bills included in these votes include the Medicare Drug bill:

? $139 Billion in Windfall Profits for the Pharmaceutical Industry
? Blocks Medicare from Collective Bargaining for Lower Prices
? Prevent Re-importation from Canada

Most readers know I’m not a fan of 3, but the others are significant issues (Greg Blankenship makes a reasonable argument on two that I simply disagree with over at a New Can of Worms)

Hyde numbers later….

DCCC Takes on Genocidal Dictator’s Future Son-In-Law

This is really making me angry so get used to me complaining….

The DCCC’s press release is here

Republicans are attacking Weller’s opponent, Tari Renner, for raising questions about Rep. Weller’s potential conflict of interest on the subcommittee with jurisdiction over Guatemala. But it was Republicans like Sen. Peter Fitzgerald who claimed that Sen. Carol Moseley Braun had “forfeited the right to represent the people of Illinois” for visiting with the wife Nigerian dictator Gen. Sani Abacha. [Daily Herald, 10/30/98]

Now, everyone knows I don’t have much use for Moseley Braun and that move was one of my last straws with the woman. But let’s look at the differences here–Weller is marrying into one of the most notorious families in Central America and his future wife isn’t just a member of the family, but a key part of the political dynasty. This isn’t about marrying just some random related person, this is about marrying a savage dictator’s political ally who only last year was part of a campaign that was destabilizing to a very fragile democracy.

Illinois Republican Senate Nomination Cattle Call 7-9

This is it until Sunday–I have Cubs-Cards tickets for tomorrow.

1. Uberweis–he’s willing. And he came in second. Free Ice Cream!

2. Ditka. The idea seems to have some traction to say the least, but I heard Mrs. Ditka is more frightening than he is.

3. Jack! getting beaten out of the press now. 5,000 people party on the north shore? Didn’t the last one involve some sort of hazing?

4. Andrea Grubb Barthwell. Quit her post–overtures must have been somewhat promising

5. Schillerstrom. Doubt he’s dumb enough to do it with no party money (I hear Rauschenberger was only offered $750,000.

6. McCracken. See above.

7. Wood. Send conservatives into a tizzy. Be fun, but not much fun for the Central Committee

8. Borling. Moderate for a general election, but 2.4% kills him.

9. Jonathan Wright. Build for the future.

10. Norm Hill. Only way he’ll do it is if they mistake him for Ryan at the 5,000 person rally on the North Shore.

11. Kathuria. Resume too long to finish for the Central Committee members.

Minus the bizarreness of a Ditka choice, this could be a full scale meltdown the GOP Leaders were hoping to avoid. Ditka would mean everything goes into chaos. Either the moderates tank the ticket with the conservatives or the others tank it with moderate swing voters and marginal Republican leaners meaning the down ballot suffers. Ditka may be the GOPs best hope at this point.

Trial Lawyer Impact

An interesting question running around blogs is how will John Edwards background as a trial lawyer affect people. It’ll certainly harden the views of some doctors and the Chamber of Commerce, but one has to remember that people like trial lawyers individually and dislike the idea of lawyers in general.

Time has some polling data they are releasing today. Only 28.4% say being a trial lawyer negatively affects their opinion of Edwards. 54.8% says that background makes them think he fights for the average person.

Big numbers:

Registered Likely
Voters Voters
———- ——–
1003 774

Kerry 46.5% 46.7%

Bush 43.5% 44.7%

Nader 3.6% 3.5%

Not Sure 6.4% 5.1%

Wrong track Total 48.8% Registered Voters 50.0% Likely Voters 49.1%

Approve (President) Total 48.1% Registered 48.4% Likely 49.3%