2004

Party for the President

Remember everyone, Alan Keyes is hosting a Party for the President tonight at the Chicago Hilton

It seems like a strange event for Keyes given his past work making sure to say,

I Am Not A Bush Republican

Because, you know that Bush guy is sort of a leftist

Instead of the promised attempt to rein in government domination of education, we have an education bill that ramps-up federal funding, increases federal control, and was cooperatively stripped of all elements of support for genuine school choice and local control.

By aggressively defending racial preferences before the Supreme Court, the administration has directly betrayed those of its supporters who naively trusted it to pursue the unifying goal of a color blind nation.

Unlike the urgency and vigor of President Reagan’s program to renew the morale and strength of our military, President Bush’s program so far seems content to consolidate the disastrous cutbacks of the Clinton years.

Even when a correct step is taken, the administration seems incapable of giving, or unwilling to give, a principled and satisfactory reason. Thus, the decision to withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol against supposed global warming caused by “greenhouse gases” was made for the sake of the economy ? as though a genuine threat of cataclysmic environmental destruction could be ignored for the sake of our pocketbook! Instead of clear and forceful assertions that the United States will not be intimidated by the latest junk-science propaganda of the hysterical, globalist, Luddite anti-liberty left, the administration says, in effect, “We can’t save the world ? it would cost too much.”

And more fun

I’ve been watching closely, and I have not seen a single serious Bush administration initiative that corresponds in reality to the agenda of liberty and of conservative principles. And meanwhile, the most successful policy of all seems to be the unrelenting GOP establishment campaign to suppress criticism of Bush administration policies by anyone trying to speak for the moral conservative voters who, by voting against Al Gore, allowed Mr. Bush to squeak into office despite losing the popular vote

Keyes Transcript

From the Herald

It’s rather bizarre. You get free media time and you talk about how the media engages in polemics and insert your own polemics inbetween.

What the reporters missed was asking him a straightfoward question about what his public policy positions were towards contraception. I’m fairly sure that answer–if anyone can get it out of him, might be as entertaining as what you get out of him when taunting him.

It’s the Ice Cream

Oberweis suggests homosexuality can be changed like his weight loss:

Not all Republicans were lambasting Keyes, however. Former Senate candidate Jim Oberweis of Aurora said Keyes could have thought through his remark, then suggested homosexuality can be changed like obesity, citing his own vast weight loss in the past year.

You know, I get the argument (disagree with it, but get it) that homosexuality is some sort of choice or aberrant behavior–but like weight loss?

Trib Has Fun With Keyes

It’s just the SCLM at it again though….

Then again, is all of that the stuff of Alan Keyes’ candidacy? Or is his candidacy about Alan Keyes, himself?

Meanwhile, the Illinois Republican Party has managed to look steadily more foolish. Its convention delegates have been reduced to wondering why Keyes spends so much time studying his dance card of scheduled media interviews instead of chatting with them.

No surprise there. Every cuckolded spouse has to sort out feelings of resentment.

Until someone consults a divorce attorney, though, this marriage uneasily proceeds. With one likely outcome. As Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said Tuesday about Republican prospects for retaining a majority in the Senate: “I think it’s clear we lose Illinois.”

The only surprise to me is that it took nearly a month for him to fully implode, but really, anyone who followed his performances in 1996 and 2000 had to know this would happen.

The Illinois GOP didn’t get Sam Brownback or Rick Santorum, they got a full on theatrical nutcase who thinks running a campaign is a teaching moment to condescend to the press.

As he moved to a new place to take reporters’ questions, his spokeswoman suggested he had taken enough questions. He disagreed, telling her, “This is a teaching moment.”

Even better, he was insulting to the delegates and IL GOP officials there:

After days of criticism that he had not addressed the Illinois delegates, Keyes finally made his speech Wednesday morning, hijacking the podium from DuPage County Board Chairman Robert Schillerstrom, who had only asked for a round of applause for Keyes. Realizing Keyes intended to speak, Schillerstrom admonished him, futilely, to “Please make it very brief.”

Building up to his trademark high-decibel fever pitch, Keyes shouted, “We shall deal with the challenge that is being mounted today to the family structure throughout our country: Gay marriage activists who are demanding that we should take marriage off the foundation of procreation, child rearing, responsibility to the future, that is the true heart of marriage and place it on a basis of selfishness, pleasure-seeking and self-fulfillment.”

The thing about meeting and spending time with the members of the Illinois Delegation is all of them go back to their communities where they can

A) Work hard for a guy who impressed them and gave them some inspiration

or

B) Determine that in the small amount of time he deigned to address them he told them what they should do and rudely hijacked the meeting he lost any potential support he might have gained.

And, of course, it’s now up to Barack Obama to defend the Vice President’s family

Keyes’ Democratic opponent, state Sen. Barack Obama, addressed the issue after a speech at the Illinois AFL-CIO convention in Rosemont. “I have strong disagreements with Vice President Cheney on a whole host of policy issues, but I respect the love he has for his daughter, and I think that it’s never appropriate to make the sort of comments that have been made,” Obama said. “I think it’s going to be up to the Republican Party to figure out whether they reflect an inclusive and generous spirit, or whether they want to reflect some of the bitterness we’ve been hearing lately.”

It’s a perfect response because it defends a Republican while attacking Keyes in a way that most voters will view as positive. That is some stategery that Keyes is showing.

The After Zell

Eric Zorn has the transcripts up of Zell’s appearances on Hardball and CNN

I saw both, the CNN was more damning in many ways. MSNBC was entertaining, but not nearly as substantive. Blitzer actually called on his expertise covering the Pentagon and cornered Miller on the B-2 and the F-14. The Apache was also included as I recall and we saw the exact problem of the Apache in Kosovo where it’s heavy deployment footprint makes it hard to use in an armed forces that needs to be highly mobile. The B-2 is virtually useless except in a large scale nuclear war–not unlike the B-1 that is marginally useful only after retrofits. The F-117 is far more effective in delivering conventional weapons as a stealth aircraft. The programs stick around because defense contractors spread their development around to enough Congressional districts.

As far as I can tell, Greenfield stopped asking questions because he was laughing when I watched.

Then Again

Zell Miller’s performance on Hardball is pretty damn close to as crazy as Keyes.

You’ll have to choose the Miller Interview. Larry Gatlin later was pretty classy heckling back at the crowd too.

And for goodness sakes–what does the MX,the B-1, the Apache or the biggest boondoggle and safety hazard to our troops, the Harrier have to do with keeping America safe now? Or even then?

The MX is now useless. The B-1 was useless within a few years of being operational, the Apache is an unreliable attack helicopter.

UPDATED: Removed bit about the Harrier–Xan points out I was confused with the Osprey. It was late.

But apparently the Harrier wasn’t much better–thanks Ralph

UPDATE 2: Actually, this reminds me that the Osprey was supposed to replace the Harrier–thus the votes to kill the Harrier were to usher in the next generation of jets.