December 2002

Gagging the EPA

It isn’t often I find much worthwhile in the Post-Dispatch. St. Louis’s supposedly liberal paper is poorly written and poorly edited. Today, is an exception, though I still think the editorial could have been stronger. Today they discuss the administration’s efforts to Gag the EPA.

One could claim that science has been politicized for some time as some recently have, but that doesn’t address the amount of politicization in one administration versus another. It is a postmodern cop-out. Either way, isn’t it time for a different way of doing busines?

Huh?

Reynolds often invites scorn by rather juvenile coded messages that ignore the point of the blogosphere–pointing towards the original source. Often this is followed by a descent into more juvenile jibes being thrown about. The problem is that when he does say things that are absurd, too many names are being called.

Here he argues that humanitarian aid is apparently of no use to projecting America abroad. The money qu0te is:

It doesn’t matter if you’re a humanitarian: you’re still just a target to these people.

Well, unless these people are all of the Arab/Muslim world there are a lot of those other people to impact and turn into allies on the side of human dignity. Apparently, after Murray was defended by say, people who have actually studied Al Qaeda, there had to be another way to smear Murray and just throwing up his hands and saying humanitarian aid was pointless was the method for Reynolds.

The real question for the US is how do he aid in developing democratic institutions in the Middle East and what tools will most help such a process. Humanitarian aid, infrastructure and other social services don’t solve the problem alone, but they do build up good will and civil society. Good will provides fewer recruits and fewer places to hide for violent Islamists. Strong civil societies lead to greater freedom.

Or you can just be a knee jerk know nothing. Everyone has a choice, I guess.

G-Ry Indictment Countdown

I’m pretty sure that no one is surprised, but with the election in hind-sight, G-Ry is about to be indicted. Rich Miller covers the essential details.

There was some question as to whether G-Ry’s daughter was the key or Fawell. Apparently Fawell will bring down his old boss.

Never trust a man who hires a $2 hooker.

Read the story above for a good start, but this story could break much harder over the next couple years. Both parties in Illinois have a lot they don’t want anyone to know about, but one issue that may yet come out with someone like Fawell on the hook is the ties of Republican to black street gangs. Everyone understands that Democrats have some ties to such gangs through GOTV efforts. Because the story is tough to nail even on the modest efforts of Democrats, nothing much has broken publicly.

Gator Bradley and Larry Hoover, Gangster Disciples, are tied to the 1990 Edgar election. No one will say exactly what was going on, but the conspiracy theory alledges that Hoover and Bradley worked with Edgar’s people to get him elected. It is hard to imagine Jim Edgar knowing about this personally, but the key question no one that I know of has nailed down is whether these guys were flown around on election day 1990 on state planes. The payoff was supposedly continued control of the Illinois Prison system by the gangs.

Some of this started to come out when the Richard Speck tapes emerged and the public got an inside look at how out of control the state’s prisons were. If anyone remembers the hearings, they were stopped pretty quickly. No one in any either party wanted to know what would come out.

Fawell is the kind of guy who can probably lead federal prosecutors to ask the right questions of the right people. I have little doubt Patrick Fitzgerald has the guts to do so. The people of Illinois deserve a full investigation. I doubt there is a tie to that and the Harold Washington Party stalking horse candidate that some Republicans employed, but I guess it is possible. If so, this could hit hard and fast beginning in January.

Chalk one up for Petey.

Kaus and half-full glasses

While I applaud any references to Gregg Easterbrook’s environmental reporting, Kaus seems to have missed one of the bigger environmental stories broken about the Bush administration and it is damn ugly

The administration stopped the issuance of a danger warning to consumers for a particular type of asbestos. I normally find little in the P-D of use, but this story is a must read that carefully deconstructs the political meddling in a situation in which science should determine EPA choices.

The money is here:


Martyak, chief EPA spokesman, argues that the agency has informed the public of the potential dangers. "It’s on our Web site," he said.

Some Questions

Joshua Grossman had some questions. Some of which I’ll answer now and others I do more with later.

1) Now that Demos have Gov + both houses of legis. in Ill., what
legislation can we expect to see passed??

Not too much given the $5 Billion hole in the state budget. As noted below by Rich Miller revenue enhancement will occur. The next two years will be budget, budget, and less budget.

Union issues will be at the front, but only of the costless variety for a couple years. A minimum wage hike can be expected to be an issue, but it may not make it. Chicago school reform is off the table fortunately. The union had been bucking to repeal the reform from the 90’s, but Duncan came up with a compromise.

Ultimately, rural school district and other not so wealthy district funding will have to come up. I’ve been saying that since 1990 so sooner or later I’ll be right. From what I can tell Madigan doesn’t want to touch it so I’m not sure it will rise to the top.

2)Can Demos recruit serious candidate to run against Jerry Weller(who I
see as only even THEORETICALLY vulnerable incumbent U.S.House member of eitherparty from IL or MO for that matter.

Weller probably is safer than you think. He snakes into McLean County so his parents can vote for him (lame redistricting reason of the cycle). His district is largely rural and conservative. A bit of labor, but McLean and the rural areas outpoll labor pretty easily. Of potentially vulnerable, Kirk is first on the list and sometime in the distant future, Hyde’s seat might become competitive or Hasterts. Neither is in trouble anytime soon, but trends are moving especially in 6 (Hyde). Kirk is safe for now and until he retires (don’t get me wrong there). Biggert’s district might be competitive in a few years as well.

The person who didn’t draw a fight that surprised me was Tim Johnson. That district should be strong Republican, but that guy is such a dirtbag it is hard to imagine someone couldn’t have just stood up and pointed that out repeatedly and gotten 48% of the vote at least. I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets primaried at some point–like after a DUI or something.

So no, I don’t see anyone vulnerable in Illinois.

3)Can a Kirk type win statewide Repub. primary in IL????—if not I
wonder if Repubs. r doomed statewide unless Demos recruit felons or Mosely-Braun.

Ask Andrew McKenna the summer of ’04. I tend to think not if you are new to the scene. I don’t doubt that Edgar or Big Jim Thompson could do it, but the ground operation of the wingnuts is consistently beating out moderates. There best shot would be to target lessor offices and move up from there.

4)And finally do Wellstonian type Demos in state leg. in either IL or MO
have a "Progressive Caucus" a la U.S. House???

Missouri. Don’t make me laugh. Actually there is a black caucus in both states. I’m not sure of other interest groups in Missouri. Missouri legislature is a rather strange bird and given many people who would normally have the same interests hate each other, not much organizing goes on. Maybe someone else is more familiar with it.

In Illinois there certainly are legislative interest groups and I forget how they are organized. Traditionally, goo-goos in the Democratic Party are often around and quickly run over. Dawn Clark Netsch is a great example.

5) Why have the Cook County SUBURBS of Chicago—taken en toto—trended much more to Dems(e.g. state leg. elections) than have the other burbs (e.g.DuPage, Kane etc.) which continue to elect almost exclusively Repubs.

Demographics and DuPage is starting to follow, though it will take a while. Read the Emerging Democratic Majority and it is the same old story. Inner ring burbs are going Democratic on social issues. Either they are labor towns or the liberal elites of lore. Places like Oak Park are beautiful old towns that are populated by liberals who love nice houses.

Kane is exurbia exemplified. Mega Churches (Willow Creek is just over the Cook border), malls, congestion and a mediocre standard of living.

DuPage avoided some reallignment for a long time by the existence of an iron tight machine. With the retirement of Pate Philip, defeat of J-Ry and the containment of Birkett in DuPage, that will start to change. They are losing their positions and as such, they won’t have much to spread around the county. It won’t be a solid Democratic area by any means, but it will become more competitive.

Will County is heading towards the Republicans as it becomes more exurban in nature instead of being a hotbed of labor. Will isn’t growing in the good way though. Think of those clowns who jumped out of the stands at Comiskey and you are seeing the unfortunate future of Will County (save your whining about my description Will residents–I was born there).

6)Why do rural/small town counties in Iowa, including ones that border Missouri, vote for Dems. Gov.Vilsack AND Sen.Harkin in 2002(almost all did for both except for far west of state by Nebraska) & for Gore+Nader over Bush + Buchanan in 2000 (many did , though definitely fewer than Vilsack/ Harkin won), while rural/small town counties in Missouri almost all(including those on border w/Iowa) voted for Talent in 2002,Bush in 2000.

Because Iowans have infinitely better judgment and more class than Miserians. I’ve lived both places and I choose Iowa for niceness, culture and style. Iowa has a strange prairie progressive streak similar to Minnesota and Wisconsin and it goes that far south. Missouri outside of KC and St. Louis is a southern state looking for some southern manners. Part of it might be the quality of the farming and the strength of the communities. Part of it probably is that Iowa hasn’t traditionally been divided on class issues like Missouri. Iowa is very homogenous and so there are fewer tensions historically based on race. Iowa’s churches probably promote social justice more.

These really aren’t answers because they don’t answer why Iowa is the way it is. I don’t know. As one state official put it in discussing why Iowa was successful in ag outreach projects for environmental quality, "They are just good people."

That doesn’t mean Republicans are bad, but there is something about Iowa that overcomes partisan divisions and allows people to switch between parties easier. I think. When does Hogberg come back anyway?

Suburban Pols

Betty Loren-Maltese is out in Cicero and the good fight continues. Two community activists–read not mobbed up and trying to clean up the garbage that has hung on since Capone’s death–vie to be Mayor of Cicero. The Dark Side has also tapped a Latino hoping to keep power just a bit longer. My guess is they will be successful, but with the growing Latino population the dark sides days are numbered. Well, that and an aggressive US Attorney.

And just how many Italians are even left in Chicago Heights?

Chicago Alderman

I have to admit that minus a few favorite alderman, I’m not wired into the Chicago Aldermanic races well enough to give tight discussions of the politics involved. Then again, as has been previously noted, most alderman are pretty much bobbleheads in Chicago so who the hell cares. As long as they answer the phones and fill out the work orders everyone is happy. In a couple interesting races there is some mild interest.

First, Bob Love is running in the 15th. With his connections and access to money he’ll put up a challenge.

Second, in the most humorous race of the year Benard Stone’s son is running and Stone is endorsing the other guy.