Buck had better comment on this one is all I have to say.
Joyce’s title to her screed from a couple weeks ago:
Some fine lines:
To tax the world for this project would be the start of another slippery slope that could end in the United Nations controlling the water of the world..
Water has always been free in public places and drinking fountains readily available. In recent years we have seen people buying bottles of water paying high prices for water than for juice or soft drinks. Is this a trend that leads to de-sensitizing us to pay for all our water?
Actually, the water isn’t free. It’s paid by someone whether by municipality or the storekeeper, but that isn’t free unless you are taking it directly from a body of water. It actually costs something to pump water, clean it and then send it to somewhere else.
It has long been known the environmentalists have been promoting a reduction in the world?s population as they fear we are over-populated and consuming all the earth’s resources. If promoting abortion and homosexuality have not worked to decrease the population in the United States, then apparently it is time to introduce euthanasia as they have in Holland.
Yep, promoting homosexuality is a way of decreasing the population….
“Please make me a drink of grain alcohol and rainwater, and help yourself to whatever you’d like.”
OK, that’s Mandrake — but apropos.
What the hell is she talking about? That column is barely coherent.
I’ve suggested previously that they rename the column something like “barely coherent”
I just got the 40th Anniversary edition–wow is it good.