The Note on DSCC Fundraising

Glenn Brown pointed out the Note‘s Obama mention today in comments:

On a day when Washington is focused on confusion and horror in Iraq, tomorrow’s key job numbers, Sen. John Kerry’s expected $40 million+ (+++++++++!!!!!!!!!!!!!) quarterly take, the DSCC’s $7 million March haul (Thanks, Mr. Obama!), continued GOP fundraising prowess, and on highway bill and welfare reform deliberations — President Bush signs a base-strengthening bill in the Rose Garden at the White House, Sen. Kerry recovers from surgery, and The Note is looking slightly further into the future.

Rauschenberger’s Future

The Illinois Leader slobbers over Steve Rauschenberger in a piece that suggests he’d be a good candidate for Governor.

That’s okay because he would be a good candidate and really the best antidote to a flip and ever campaigning Governor for the Republicans. Staying out of whether he could beat Blagojevich in general, he would seem best positioned to put up a credible challenge. The press loves him. He bridges moderates and conservatives in the Republican Party well–not alienating either group. He is a clear voice and a goo-goo. Normally goo-goos are assumed to be liberal, but Steve has certainly shown himself to believe in basic good government issues. He also has an encyclopedic knowledge of state government in general and the budget specifically.

Compared to potential rivals he’d be in the best position. Topinka is hated by social conservatives or at least enough to call into question whether she could unite the party for a general election. Fitzgerald has all sorts of problem with the public. Mostly centered on the public doesn’t know who he is and he is a sitting Senator. O’Malley is the favorite candidate of Blagojevich because the I’m Mad as Hell bit doesn’t actually work in the general election. O’Malley also alienates what is left of moderate Republicans. Though I do think the Combine wouldn’t mind him being the nominee so they could teach him a lesson by handing him one of the most lopsided defeats in Illinois history.

What’s the Issue for the GOP if Ryan goes down in flames?

It isn’t keeping the seat, they expect to lose it. If Ryan can keep it that is a bonus, but not the key. Bush is down by double digits to Kerry in Illinois and the Bush Campaign is already making noises about pulling out. Ryan was recruited because he could partially self-fund and make it a decent race. Even if he didn’t win, he’d be leading the ticket and pull out Republican voters so the down ballot races didn’t suffer. So state lege members in tight races wouldn’t have to worry about turnout sinking their chance. If he goes down in flames too late to be replaced, it could create huge problems for the Party in those Lege races.

And while most of the big news media outlets are avoiding the story, Rich Miller is covering it and getting referenced in the Hotline for it. Miller’s reporting is in a for pay daily newsletter and so I’ll only briefly summarize the work here–he does this for a living, I don’t.

1) Hastert has warned Ryan D.C. money will dry up if Ryan doesn’t deal with the issue.
2) Senate Minority Leader Watson and House Minority Leader Cross pressed the issue as well (and they are really worried). Ryan refused to answer questions about whether he’d appeal if the judge rules against him.

Knowing how this will work, even if information is only mildly embarrassing Ryan has probably lost any favors from these folks later in the race. They aren’t going to put themselves out there for a guy who won’t go along with them.

Ryan’s problems at this point are many. He is spending what should be a press honeymoon, talking about something that is not on message. His opponent is being fawned over in the press nationally and locally more than a candidate usually gets in that honeymoon after a primary.

Ryan is making party elders nervous and whether he realizes it or not, they are threatening to cut him off. He run as independent, he can’t run with a party shunning him.

He is making the press annoyed. The press, out of lots of experience, don’t trust candidates when they say “trust me”. The more they do it, the more cynical and jaded the press becomes. Ryan’s short term press problem could easily be turned into a permanent problem. Ask Hull.

Combine that with a potential appeal against the Tribune and Channel 7 and the press relationship spirals down what will seem like a black hole.

His entire outreach to the African-American community is going in the toilet. First, his opponent is black. Second, he is tied to a President who is not well liked in the African-American community. Third, even if he didn’t expect actual numbers in the African-American community, the image such a courting produces could help him elsewhere. Without it being the story, but instead a “Hollywood Divorce” with a beautiful actress being the story, Jack! goes from a compelling story of giving back to the community to a story about privilege in the court system.

None of this may be fair. He may have nothing to hide, but is deeply concerned about his son’s welfare. And that is all irrelevant. He needs to put this story to bed and do it fast.

Money Problems? LOL

One of the whispers is that Obama is going to have problems raising money. DSCC has to target other races including Colorado, South Carolina, Oklahoma and nominally Missouri (where sources say the DSCC is going to dump a bit of cash and pretend like they care before moving on) and all the money is going to Kerry.

Now, it is still early, but I didn’t buy it. I could be wrong. But liberal big money donors are generally guilty white people who would be more than happy to throw money at a viable black candidate. The Hotline reports Obama, an open seat candidate who would normally be relying on the DSCC, raised nearly $130,000 in 30 minutes for the DSCC.

Obama is making the smart move though in raising those funds. First it gets him good relations with sitting Senators if he gets there and if a pinch comes, he gets help.

Obama in the WSJ

Small bit from the Hotline summarizing it:

Wall Street Journal’s Harwood writes Obama “flavors orthodox” Dem “liberalism with support for welfare reform, charter schools and an overhauled death penalty.” But “his message isn’t milquetoast. He embraced Howard Dean’s antiwar themes, in contrast to the cautious support” that John Kerry provided the WH on Iraq and other Bush initiatives that Kerry now criticizes. Obama: “Democrats make a mistake when we get steamrolled on the front end and then whine about it on the back end.” Given IL’s increasingly Dem cast, “it isn’t likely” that Obama “will stumble. But he could.” Ryan is credible, “and the issue of race remains a wild card anywhere” (3/31).

Speaking of the Onion

Josh Marshall says it all.

Reading the lede of this piece from Reuters, I had to wonder whether I might actually be reading a spoof from The Onion …

An emotional former President George H.W. Bush on Tuesday defended his son’s Iraq war and lashed out at White House critics.

It is “deeply offensive and contemptible” to hear “elites and intellectuals on the campaign trail” dismiss progress in Iraq since last year’s overthrow of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, the elder Bush said in a speech to the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association annual convention.

Defies parody …

Blog Bits

Just to let you know, the blog roll is in flux as I finish the expanded blogroll which won’t be on the front page in the interest of a clean look and quick download time. How do you make the front page? My whim. Really it is a combination of who I think updates regularly in their category and who people will most enjoy. It doesn’t mean that there aren’t great blogs on the expanded page, just that there is limited space.

Radio Bits

Collective Interest’s show tonight will include:
Collective Interest radio will broadcast tonight (Wed, 31 March, 2004) at 8:05-9:55 PM (Central). You can listen at http://uicradio.ws. Tonight will be an open phone discussion on two topics: taxation and the Iraq War. To participate in the conversation call 312-413-2191 during the program.

The taxation discussion will begin with the federal income tax.

The Iraq War discussion will begin with a speech I gave in Dekalb, Illinois on the first anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq entitled ?Republicans, Democrats and the Media.?

There is a possibility the show will be a few minutes late beginning. If you tune-in and get music or the preceding show, please be patient.

Also, you are invited to visit the Collective Interest website, http://CollectiveInterest.net, and post your thoughts.

Carl Nyberg
Collective Interest radio

============

And remember the new liberal radio network is premiering today at 11 AM Central on WNTD 950 AM in Chicago, or on-line for the rest of us.

A Lesson In Knowing Who Is Talking

I have and continue to spend a fair amount of my time finding effective ways of demonstrating data visually. Over at Crooked Timber there is a post that tracks the President’s Approval ratings and it is quite dramatic. Perhaps unrepresentative given the war spike after 9/11 if one wants to quibble, but it certainly passes what I call the interocular test (Henry calls it the interocular trauma test). It is a good graph. Now notice what happens when angry little statboi enters into a comments discussion with people trained in data visualization techniques. My first comment took less time to compose than this post because the damn page in Cleveland is well worn. The moral of the story is asking questions is good. Challenging information isn’t bad. Pretending you know the F*$&##*& literature, linking to it, and directly contradicting the two biggest experts in the field when you are clueless just makes you look like an ass.

BTW, Henry is a PhD in Political Science and a quite gifted scholar so it isn’t like the result couldn’t be anticipated. And wait! I have another political science post for tomorrow! You can’t wait, I know.