The Rahminator on Meet the Press Sunday
The Copy Guy from SNL is in my head, What can I say.
Call It A Comeback
The Copy Guy from SNL is in my head, What can I say.
Kevin McCullough will be up for another month in a day or two. When you visit, feel free to disagree, but be polite. Kevin and I have little in common, but it’s always fun to read the ‘other’ side. And then say why they are wrong–but politely people.
And Bill Dennis has decided I need to be distracted so if posting is slow let him know. Heh. If you don’t read Bill’s blog, you should be. Bill does a great job covering Peoria and is a great writer on top of it. Read his bit on Lahood, G-Rod and Elvis for some of his best recent analysis.
Drop your questions for folks there or any information you’d like to hear about in comments. MyDD and Driving Votes have gotten me credentialed for the meeting. I’m unclear where eveything will appear, but expect to at least find links to it from here.
I’ll be at Dean’s event this evening as well. Or if you are going to be there, drop me a note.
For thus unfamiliar with Driving Votes it is the grassroots organization working to fight the Bush Administration and it’s policies, for more, go here
And I haven’t been able to sum up why it is such bad news for Blagojevich until I read Carol Marin who gets to a big point at the end:
Even today’s reality TV junkies who feast on the sorrows of others, even hard-hearted cynical politicos, don’t want to learn that the governor’s wife and her Dad don’t talk much or that the grandchildren don’t go fishing with their grandfather anymore. Or that their very ill grandmother is heartbroken by all of this.
It’s a sad story. And it’s bad politics.
Politicians can have tough personal times, but don’t make them public. Really, the public doesn’t want to know. Smile and say it’s private. And when you get information that someone is trading on your name like this–call them, tell them to knock it off, and then call the EPA to make sure that nothing is going and then stay the hell out of it.
It’s one thing to be a media whore, but to do it with your family in the middle looks like rank opportunism.
Not so cool with it unless it’s an ad or disclosed, but Markos disclosed so I’m unclear on what the controversy is.
I think it’s a bit naive to think that reporters and bloggers aren’t the targets of attempted influence through different means. Disclosure of money for services should be the standard and I have little doubt that when campaigns advertise they want to get good coverage. As I’ve long said, that is a relatively good bet assuming I agree with you. The ad reminds me of your campaign and so I tend to post on it more often. If I don’t agree with you that may have the oppositive effect of what you desire.
I know campaigns have tried to influence me–they say so. 😉
I’ve never taken money, though I have had drinks paid for by campaigns. I like to think of it as research. I’m not going to disclose that every time it happens. Of course, I’ve never been offered money except for ads so that makes that easy.
Capitol Fax is all over it, but make sure to stop by and vote:
It’s silly and stupid, but annoying the Leader folks is all in good fun.
I don’t have a favorite yet, though I am going to Howard Dean’s event tomorrow night here in St. Louis. I lean toward Rosenberg or Dean. I’m strongly against Roemer who would be a disaster all around. Not even because his positions are more conservative, but because he seems to have little idea of how to run a modern campaign. The committees as strong as they could be with Schumer at DSCC, Emanual at DCCC and Richardson at DGA. Roemer does not have the vision for the party and buidling it up from the grassroots. He’ll keep the party focused on consultants and not people.
As much as people like to point to Karl Rove as the great architect of Bush’s victories, one has to remember the reelection is due to grassroots operations that weren’t controlled by the campaign. That’s an important lesson.
Couldn’t you find someone better than Armstrong Williams? I mean, if you are going to misuse my tax dollars couldn’t you do it effectively?
See, Barry heard of me through a friend of mine from college. Brad teaches with Barry and Brad and I both went to Nicaragua in 1991 for a short, but incredibly packed trip meeting with the coalition government at the time and the opposition Sandinistas. Brad then went on to teach high school in Latin America and Spain and is now back in the states teaching.
I bring this up as Atrios links to the Alicublog who takes on the most recent bit on the subject by Jonah Goldberg and Glenn Reynolds (whens the last time I even mentioned these two?)
Reynolds and Goldberg take to task this point in the Newsweek article:
Now, NEWSWEEK has learned, the Pentagon is intensively debating an option that dates back to a still-secret strategy in the Reagan administration?s battle against the leftist guerrilla insurgency in El Salvador in the early 1980s. Then, faced with a losing war against Salvadoran rebels, the U.S. government funded or supported “nationalist” forces that allegedly included so-called death squads directed to hunt down and kill rebel leaders and sympathizers. Eventually the insurgency was quelled, and many U.S. conservatives consider the policy to have been a success?despite the deaths of innocent civilians and the subsequent Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal.
Both complain that Nicaragua and El Salvador are different countries so Iran-Contra has nothing to do with El Salvador. The problem with this logic is that it avoids the factual evidence that not only were both efforts a part of a larger strategy, but the operations overlapped quite frequently. From the Walsh investigation into Iran-Contra:
Donald P. Gregg in 1951 began a career of more than 30 years with the Central Intelligence Agency. That service included several overseas postings, including a tour in South Vietnam during the war. In 1979 Gregg was detailed by the CIA to the National Security Council staff, where his responsibilities included Asian affairs and intelligence matters. Following the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, the new Administration requested that Gregg remain at the NSC. Until 1982, Gregg headed the NSC’s Intelligence Directorate. In August 1982, he resigned from the CIA and accepted the position of national security adviser to Vice President George Bush, holding that position until the end of the Reagan Administration. In early 1989, President Bush nominated Gregg to be U.S. ambassador to the Republic of South Korea. Gregg was confirmed by the Senate for this position on September 12, 1989, and served as ambassador until 1993.
During the Vietnam War, Gregg supervised CIA officer Felix Rodriguez and they kept in contact following the war. Gregg introduced Rodriguez to Vice President Bush in January 1985, and Rodriguez met with the Vice President again in Washington, D.C., in May 1986. He also met Vice President Bush briefly in Miami on May 20, 1986. As a teenager, Rodriguez had participated in the ill-fated Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba and remained, following that debacle, an ardent anti-communist.
In 1985 and 1986, Rodriguez worked out of the Ilopango air base in El Salvador, where he assisted the Salvadoran Air Force in anti-guerrilla counterinsurgency tactics. In late 1985 and during 1986, Rodriguez — whose alias was “Max Gomez” — became increasingly involved in the contra-resupply effort that was based at Ilopango at that time. Because of Rodriguez’s close association with General Juan Bustillo, who headed the Salvadoran Air Force, Rodriguez was vital to Lt. Col. Oliver L. North’s contra-resupply operation by coordinating flights based at Ilopango.
Following the shootdown of the contra-resupply aircraft carrying American Eugene Hasenfus on October 5, 1986, Rodriguez became a center of public and congressional attention. Because of Rodriguez’s close friendship with Gregg and his three personal meetings with Vice President Bush, questions arose whether the contra-resupply operation was being directed by Gregg through Rodriguez. Questions also arose about when the Vice President’s office became aware of Rodriguez’s and North’s active participation in the contra-resupply operation at Ilopango.
Both Gregg and his deputy, Col. Samuel J. Watson III, were investigated for possible false testimony regarding their denial of knowledge of Rodriguez’s involvement in North’s contra-resupply operation. OIC obtained Watson’s immunized testimony in an effort to further its investigation. Despite unresolved conflicts between documentary evidence and the testimony of the principal witnesses, OIC determined that it could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt a criminal case against Gregg.
Gregg, Rodriguez and North
When Gregg assumed his position as assistant to the Vice President for national security affairs in August 1982, he consciously disassociated himself from former colleagues with whom he had worked during his CIA career. The exception to that rule was Felix Rodriguez. Gregg testified: “. . . I have made it a conscious decision really not to reach back into that part of my life to bring other people forward. Felix is the only exception I have made to that.” 1 Gregg lost track of Rodriguez for a period of time after Vietnam and did not see him until the early 1980s, when Rodriguez came to Washington sporadically and talked with Gregg about old times. Gregg was not certain what Rodriguez was doing at that time, and he did not inquire; however, they remained friends.2
The larger problem is that both Goldberg and Reynolds seem to lose their moral clarity pretty quickly in regard to these events. It’s hard for Brad and I to do after meeting several people who worked as literacy workers or other civilian position tell you of their story of being raped by Contras as a part of the efforts to bring down the Sandinistas. Targeting civilian populations with such torture tactics has a name: Terrorism.
For those who need reminding, the US is supposed to be against terrorism. Death squads or whatever you want to call them, don’t just target insurgents. Their primary aim is to target civilians and scare people into submission.
Barry Bradford, a teacher at Stevenson High in Lincolnshire, had three students working to publicize the case of three murdered civil rights workers during the Freedom Summer in 1964.
With the arrest of Edgar Ray Killen for the murders, they are receiving some well earned attention.
Barry thanks the readers who contacted their Representatives. I think we should thank Barry and the three students, Sarah Siegel, Allison Nichols and Brittany Saltiel For more information go here.
From Barry:
On December 15, you were kind enough to post a request from my students,
asking your readers to write their Congressman to request a reopening of
the “Mississippi Burning” Murder Case. ?On behalf of Brittany, Sarah, and
Allison, I’d like to thank all of the ArchPundit readers who helped make a
difference!Here is an article from the Belleville News-Democrat:
Posted on Fri, Jan. 07, 2005
Student documentarians gratified by arrest in civil rights killings
NICOLE ZIEGLER DIZON
Associated PressCHICAGO – Hundreds of miles from a Mississippi courtroom where a suspect
pleaded innocent Friday to the 40-year-old slayings of three civil rights
workers, three suburban Chicago high school students were getting
accolades for their role in publicizing the case.Stevenson High School students Sarah Siegel, Allison Nichols and Brittany
Saltiel spent more than a year working on a 2004 documentary about the
killings. Their project included a rare phone interview with the man
arrested Thursday, reputed Ku Klux Klan member Edgar Ray Killen, and
helped generate a congressional resolution last June asking federal
prosecutors to reopen the case.“I was really happy for all the families who I knew had been waiting for
this for 40 years,” 17-year-old Siegel said Friday of Killen’s arrest. “It
was also a little saddening to know that it took 40 years for justice to
start working.”The girls and their teacher, Barry Bradford, are humble about their part
in renewing interest in the case, which was the subject of the 1988 movie
“Mississippi Burning.”But congressmen including Rep. John Lewis, a Georgia Democrat and civil
rights activist who knew the slain workers, credit the students for
working to keep the case in the spotlight and unearthing new details.“I was very inspired and very moved by the work that these three students
brought before us,” Lewis said Friday. “I think they were crucial in
bringing us to this point.”The girls’ odyssey began in the summer of 2003, when they met with
Bradford to discuss possible projects for the annual National History Day
competition. They stopped him after his first idea: telling the story of
21-year-old James Chaney, 20-year-old Andrew Goodman and 24-year-old
Michael Schwerner.The three young men were participating in Freedom Summer 1964, an effort
to register blacks in the South to vote and start educational programs,
when they were beaten and shot to death, allegedly by Klansmen. Their
ages, not much older than the girls, struck a chord.“We just thought something about those three men and their dedication to
the movement really stood out,” 16-year-old Saltiel said.Although 19 men were eventually charged with federal civil rights
violations in the case, Killen’s arrest marks the first time Mississippi
has sought murder charges.The Lincolnshire students pored over thousands of pages of court
transcripts and interviewed former prosecutors and investigators,
witnesses, family members of the victims and government officials for
their 10-minute documentary. They also sought out Killen, now 79, for a
phone interview.Bradford decided to conduct the interview after a Justice Department
official expressed concern about the girls having to testify in the future
in case Killen said something incriminating.Killen didn’t implicate himself in the killings, Bradford said, but he did
say the reason civil rights workers were so hated at the time was because
people thought they were recruiting blacks to be communists.Soon after that interview, Bradford said his and the girls’ names were
posted on a white supremacist Web site that accused them of trying to skew
the truth.“I think it was truly a little startling to them to realize that there are
still remnants of that archaic mind-set,” Bradford said.The students say the most rewarding part of their project was meeting with
family members of the slain men, including Goodman’s mother and Chaney’s
brother, who called them “superhero girls.”