Fair and Unfair criticism

In terms of Tammy Duckworth’s candidacy, I get the point that many are upset at Rahm’s role in the race and that’s fair game.

What I don’t get are people trying to turn an accomplished woman into a simple tool of Rahm Emanuel. Tom Roeser provides the most recent example:

Emanuel has crafted for Duckworth what he believes will be a winning issue format. While she has received a medical discharge from the service, since Emanuel took her under his wing, Duckworth has announced that she will stay in the Illinois National Guard and would be one of about a half dozen members of Congress serving in the Guard. Her life experience can be used for her trade policy: Her husband worked at two companies that outsourced jobs to other countries, prompting her to advocate a mildly protectionist stance.

Now comes what Emanuel believes is the coup de grace. She goes hard left on social policy. She is not only pro-abort but even opposes parental notification for minors seeking abortions. Opposing parental notification is a bummer in the district and represents an extreme position, but Emanuel needs to placate the district’s small but potent liberal Democratic base in order to neutralize Duckworth’s primary opponent, Christine Cegalis who sounds not unlike Democratic national chairman Howard Dean. Duckworth also supports embryonic stem cell research which, at Emanuel’s direction, she blurs into plain “stem cell” research. Bearing the imprint of her political Svengali, Duckworth talks blandly of not “substituting government for family when it comes to making personal medical decisions”-a coded reference to Terri Schiavo, another appeal to a base which hated the Schiavo intervention.

Keep it up. If she becomes the nominee a lot over voters in the 6th are going to take this sort of crap and start to see the underlying implication being made by Roeser and others that a woman couldn’t possibly be able to have her own positions so it’s all evil Rahm’s doing because he’s the big strong alpha male. That’ll work wonders with moderate suburban women.

Conventional Wisdom Is….The Attack on Washington is a Bad Thing

And the conventional wisdom is wrong. I’ve spent more than a few hours teeing off on the guy, but he’s a good campaigner and while his numbers are in the toilet, he found the institution with lower approval ratings headed by a Republican President with lower approval in Illinois than Rod has.

Running against Bush and the Republican Congress papers over problems within the party and puts Eisendrath in an uncomfortable position of responding with “I agree, but” (to his credit Eisendrath seems to have already moved around that trap with soundbites about how G-Rod’s criticisms of Bush are Eisendrath’s criticisms of Blagojevich).

Sure, it’s another bogeyman, but bogeymen work when their polling is below his own. Everyone decries negative campaigning, but people keep using it simply because it works.

It also sets up an uncomfortable position for a moderate Republican who wants to hold on to the Republican base that dearly loves Bush, but also wants to attract moderate swing voters who, in Illinois, increasingly dislike Bush. Any sort of attack on All Kids, environmental regulation, child care (an underreported portion of his speech) or the like gets to have the reply be, just like Bush and the Republican Congress…

For the Republican conservatives in Oberweis and Brady, they already buy into the ideology of the Republican Congress so the set-up there is obvious.

It’s good politics and if I were advising him, I’d tell him to do it. He’s never going to have an overwhelming approval rating between now and the election so setting himself up as the better alternative may well be enough. It will be if the Republican nominee is Oberweis, or by miracle Brady. Against Judy, it’ll be the most effective attack on her for a general election audience.

It does give Eisendrath the opening to argue he is both honest and stands for those things, but Eisendrath is pretty much a wild card at this point. Until he shows his hand concerning the money he’ll spend and how well he can quickly connect with voters in under two months, that is moot.

The Best Bit of the Speech

The Mercury restrictions. Jack Darin covered it over at the Sierra Club blog . Mercury pollution is a pretty straightforward problem of, if it costs more to remove it, then those using the power should pay more to remove it. The technology is there and doing it in short order makes a lot more sense than 2018. Frankly, if the specific plants can’t be retrofitted, it’s time to build new plants.

It also produced the best quote of recent weeks from Steve Rauschenberger:

“I like clean air, but…

And it didn’t get better in context:

….I’m not sure what he’s talking about is practical or affordable,

The question isn’t whether it is practical or affordable, but whether it is important to protect human health. Practical or affordable goes to methods to reach a goal, not what the goal should be. That is the basis of the Clean Air Act and the State of Illinois is clearly going to have to move ahead since Bush seems to think a twelve year phase in is reasonable.