I’m thrilled for David Loebsack. As those who read my blog know, David was my college advisor and a friend. I couldn’t be happier for him and prouder of what he has achieved.
But with that race is a sense of sadness as well. Jim Leach is a great guy. He is the guy who stopped Bill Clinton’s stupid banking reform legislation and helped avoid a future economic meltdown. He was smarter than I about the War in Iraq and he’s always practiced what he preached when it came to campaign finance not accepting PAC contributions.
He was one of the most vocal opponents of Newt Gingrich and the effort to reshape Congress and burn down the traditions that kept it functioning and restrained corruption. He talked about serious issues like nuclear non-proliferation and genocide even when it did not matter to his District.
He was everything I wanted in a Congressman. Thoughtful, independent, and committed.
But I couldn’t afford him anymore. In fact, David and I talked about this when he was thinking of running and David made it a centerpiece of his campaign.
Voting for Denny Hastert as Speaker of the House meant that the institution would continue to be debased by those who had no view of the historical importance of the institution and its rules and norms.
Voting for Denny Hastert meant that one was endorsing of the most ambitious marriages of government and business ever seen in the United States. A marriage of corruption that sought to tie the goals of Congress and Business into one instead of Congress and the people.
Voting for Denny Hastert meant that instead of tackling hard problems as Jim Leach always wanted to do, hard problems were covered up and THE GAY was used to scare the voters instead of fixing problems.
Voting for Denny Hastert allowed the institution to undergo a long, slow process of creeping illegitimacy.
Leach was right in 1992 when he was concerned about Democratic leadership ignoring the rules of the House. He was also right that the increasing influence of the religious right was a danger to his party. But when both problems appeared in one party he stayed. He fought against Gingrich and then gave up. At that point, decent or not, he was not the useful Jim Leach many admired. He was simply another Republican vote.
That simply could not continue and I will miss Jim Leach’s voice, but that voice is useless if the first aye is to betray everything he stood for.