Illinois Congressional Races

We?re in it to win. Are you?

There was some hubbub over at Kos yesterday about some media reports and the DCCC, today Jim Bonham addresses that—and does so very well.

I talk with some of the folks over there from time to time–as my cross posts there make obvious. Not a close relationship or anything where I get super secret information, but let me say, everyone I have talked there works hard to win Democratic seats. And they stay amazingly neutral in primaries when I’ve dealt with them. I’m involved deeply with Jeff Smith’s campaign for the Missouri 3rd. They have neither done anything to help or hurt any of those candidates, but I can guarantee that on August 4th, they’ll be committed to whomever the nominee is. They will have to make decisions regarding where resources will go and that is their job. That’s a tough job. Any of us might say we’d do it different, but trust me this isn’t a bunch of old guys sitting around in a backroom, these are people who work obsessively towards winning a Democratic Majority this fall in the House. Help ’em out.

Lipinski Switch

The rumor I have a line on says that Bill Lipinski will be stepping down next week and bringing his son in to take his place. This was widely reported, but now it seems ready to go. The 19th is behind the switch.

Apparently Daley had a meeting with Lipinski and yelled at him that no one else in the damn delegation could get anything done and he wanted Lipinski to stay. His tantrum was to no avail.

Box Turtles Bad, Genocidal General’s Daughters Good

Just keeping my national GOP straight–well they seem to be making sure everyone is staying straight, but that’s a different story.

Today we get some Weller follow-up. First, from yesterdays Sun-Times, a suggestion to change committees. I’m curious about the bellicose Sun-Times editors–how would they feel about a Member of Congress marrying one of Saddam’s offsprings? I’m not kidding. Remember, I generally supported the war and still think we would have eventually fought a war in Iraq, I just wish we would have done it in a drastically different manner and on a different timeline. I have no use for Saddam, but what’s the difference here? How is Rios Montt’s daughter not a problem given her father is currently under house arrest for charges stemming from the campaign she helped run?

The Daily Southtown takes Weller to task:

We’re not going to try to tell Weller whom he should fall in love with. But we are concerned about the potential conflict of interests that his relationship with Rios Sosa presents. Weller is a member of the House International Relations Committee, and his betrothal to a high-ranking official of another country presents an obvious situation in which voters will have a right to wonder whether he is voting in their best interests or the best interests of the woman he loves. The people of Guatemala and its neighbors also will have a right to question American policy and Weller’s role in it.

Weller’s Democratic opponent, Tari Renner, is trying to make the marriage, which has not yet been scheduled, an issue in the campaign. Weller is dismissing the questions as “unfortunate” and “beyond the bounds of decency.” We disagree. Weller needs to explain himself to voters, tell them how they can be sure he is representing only them and he needs to seriously consider getting off the International Relation Committee and seeking another appointment.

The Pantagraph takes a relatively tough line:

Weller’s staff was right in saying “love has no boundaries,” but there are some boundaries that elected representatives have to draw in the name of U.S. security. We can’t say Weller has crossed that line, but he’s sure tiptoeing down it.

Let me set up a rather easy to imagine story. Rios Montt is installed in a military coup. Charges dismissed and he continues where he left off slaughtering Mayans. The US considers sending troops to avoid genocide and in doing so target the leadership of the Party for arrest. What does Weller do?

This isn’t marrying an MP from Great Britain. Hell, it isn’t marrying a member of the Guatemalan assembly that is from a truly democratic party. This is marrying a party leader in a party whose very leader is under arrest on charges of trying to subvert an election and has a history of enforcing his will through the slaughter of innocents.

Danny Davis–Useful Idiot

Why not facing serious opposition is a bad thing:

Rep. Danny Davis (D-Ill.) who is an influential member when it comes to postal service issues, is being feted by Deutsche Post, the company with a controlling interest in DHL International, which competes with the U.S. Postal Service.

Davis said “there was not really anything” he had to vote on that was directly Deutsche Post-related and he agreed to front the function because the company wanted “to make sure” it had a presence at the convention.

“to make sure” it had a presence at the convention?

Most reasonable people call this getting access through disproportionate use of money. If you have serious competition you actually have to think about how stupid you sound.

And isn’t continuing the Post Office’s monopoly under the purview of your subcommittee Congressman?

And Chris thinks that Habitat’s build-up isn’t a big deal–I tend to agree except if you look at the list of partners, most are looking for access to politicians:

in an event sponsored by Dow Chemical Company, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Mortgage Bankers Association

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac especially have tight ties to Congress, though in this case at least one source besides the for profit sector is represented.

Not Going to Talk about Guatemalan Domestic Politics

I’m sorry Congressman Weller, but if you were paying attention the post as a member of the International Affair’s subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere actually means you should be talking about internal Guatemalan politics and now that you are going to be family with a butcher it becomes increasingly interesting how you might talk about it.

Would you mind denouncing Rios Montt’s history of violence against indigenous tribes? How about denouncing genocide of Mayans under Rios Montt’s rule and his harassment of them last year as he ran for office? You know, when your future wife was working to get him elected and Rios Montt’s activities have led to him being held on charges for inciting riots–how about denouncing that?

Where is all the moral clarity I kept hearing about in regards to Iraq? Doing Mayans not deserve the same moral clarity? Just curious?

Over the last decade, Mr. R?os Montt has re-emerged as the head of a political party, the Guatemalan Republican Front. Adriana Beltr?n, a researcher of Guatemala for the Washington Office on Latin America, a human rights group, said that the party “supports the interests of the right-wing military.”

When Mr. R?os Montt ran for president of Guatemala last year, his daughter called him “totally democratic.” She said that people in one town who pelted him with rocks and drowned out his speech with chants of “Murderer!” had violated his human rights.

“Zury has supported her father very strongly, and as far as I know she has never distanced herself from the atrocities, the scorched-earth policy or the massacres that were part of his presidency,” Ms. Beltr?n said.

Can You Say Indictment

Mr. DeLay had better live up to his last name because right now Ronnie Earle, Travis County District Attorney (Austin), is preparing to indict a whole bunch of folks around the Majority Leader and with the new Washington Post find of this morning, he’ll might just have enough for DeLay himself.

DeLay requested that the new donation come from “a combination of corporate and personal money from Enron’s executives,” with the understanding that it would be partly spent on “the redistricting effort in Texas,” said the e-mail to Kenneth L. Lay from lobbyists Rick Shapiro and Linda Robertson.

The e-mail, which surfaced in a subsequent federal probe of Houston-based Enron, is one of at least a dozen documents obtained by The Washington Post that show DeLay and his associates directed money from corporations and Washington lobbyists to Republican campaign coffers in Texas in 2001 and 2002 as part of a plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts.

DeLay’s fundraising efforts helped produce a stunning political success. Republicans took control of the Texas House for the first time in 130 years, Texas congressional districts were redrawn to send more Republican lawmakers to Washington, and DeLay — now the House majority leader — is more likely to retain his powerful post after the November election, according to political experts.

But DeLay and his colleagues also face serious legal challenges: Texas law bars corporate financing of state legislature campaigns, and a Texas criminal prosecutor is in the 20th month of digging through records of the fundraising, looking at possible violations of at least three statutes. A parallel lawsuit, also in the midst of discovery, is seeking $1.5 million in damages from DeLay’s aides and one of his political action committees — Texans for a Republican Majority (TRMPAC) — on behalf of four defeated Democratic lawmakers.

DeLay has not been named as a target of the investigation. The prosecutor has said he is focused on the activities of political action committees linked to DeLay and the redistricting effort. But officials in the prosecutor’s office say anyone involved in raising, collecting or spending the corporate money, who also knew of its intended use in Texas elections, is vulnerable.

Documents unearthed in the probe make clear that DeLay was central to creating and overseeing the fundraising. What the prosecutors are still assessing is who knew about the day-to-day operations of TRMPAC and how its money was used to benefit Texas House candidates.

Texas, much like Illinois, doesn’t have many campaign finance rules, but the ironclad one is no corporate money. If these documents are solid, DeLay is going to be indicted and is likely going to prison. A Texax prison at that. This is a state case.

To understand why a local DA is at the center of this, one has to understand that the Texas law regarding public corruption gives the Travis County DA authority over public corruption cases statewide. The reason is that as the State Capitol, Austin was a natural place to give the authority. Of course, Ronnie Earle is from the most liberal place in Austin so this raised the cackles of Texas Republicans as he pursued an investigation into the state redistricting efforts and the finances surrounding Republicans taking both chambers of the Texas Lege.

Republicans have threatened to defund the Travis County public corruption department that is state funded and potentially reduce Earle’s authority.

If anyone is confused about why all this effort by DeLay, remember the mid-decade redistricting the Texas Lege pulled off and his K-Street effort that seeks to have Republicans hired in key lobbying jobs. DeLay sees his role as the guy to deliver a permanent Republican majority.

The Stakeholder is all over this story.

In a little bit, look for updates as to how GOPers from Illinois are voting with DeLay–let’s just ask the question, why is a Republican Congressman from Illinois voting like a Republican Congressman from Texas?

UPDATE:

Jerry Weller-Tom Delay 94% agreement. Where do they differ? On a couple regional transportation bills and procedural motions

Phil Crane–Tom Delay 95%. Where dod they differ? On a couple regional transportation bills and one less procedural motions.

Sugarland Texas has the same values as Lake County and Central Illinois? I don’t think so.

There were no significant policy differences, but instead the differences were over procedure and pork in a given area according to Congressional Quarterly.

That said, the bills included in these votes include the Medicare Drug bill:

? $139 Billion in Windfall Profits for the Pharmaceutical Industry
? Blocks Medicare from Collective Bargaining for Lower Prices
? Prevent Re-importation from Canada

Most readers know I’m not a fan of 3, but the others are significant issues (Greg Blankenship makes a reasonable argument on two that I simply disagree with over at a New Can of Worms)

Hyde numbers later….

DCCC Takes on Genocidal Dictator’s Future Son-In-Law

This is really making me angry so get used to me complaining….

The DCCC’s press release is here

Republicans are attacking Weller’s opponent, Tari Renner, for raising questions about Rep. Weller’s potential conflict of interest on the subcommittee with jurisdiction over Guatemala. But it was Republicans like Sen. Peter Fitzgerald who claimed that Sen. Carol Moseley Braun had “forfeited the right to represent the people of Illinois” for visiting with the wife Nigerian dictator Gen. Sani Abacha. [Daily Herald, 10/30/98]

Now, everyone knows I don’t have much use for Moseley Braun and that move was one of my last straws with the woman. But let’s look at the differences here–Weller is marrying into one of the most notorious families in Central America and his future wife isn’t just a member of the family, but a key part of the political dynasty. This isn’t about marrying just some random related person, this is about marrying a savage dictator’s political ally who only last year was part of a campaign that was destabilizing to a very fragile democracy.