Illinois Congressional Races

Fine Moments in Votes of Confidence

From Roll Call

In 2004, while running to replace retiring Sen. Peter Fitzgerald (R-
Ill.), Oberweis aired a controversial television ad in which he flew a
helicopter above Soldier Field to show how many immigrants without the
right documentation enter the country through legal channels every
week -- roughly 65,000.

He now admits it probably wasn't the best idea.

"The commercial did not communicate our position well enough,"
Oberweis said. "The tone was harsh and the American public was not
ready for the message four years ago. "

But timing, again, appears to be in Oberweis' favor. With parochial
anger in the GOP base running red-hot, his identification with the
issue may tilt the race in his favor.
Let's remember that commercial here:
[kml_flashembed movie="http://youtube.com/v/Nst-aXvdrR4" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
============================================
A Republican source close to Hastert said Oberweis was "ahead of his
time" on the immigration issue but failed to understand that few
voters cared in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks.

Oberweis' shortsightedness, the source suggested, has been a liability
for the sometimes undisciplined candidate.

"[Oberweis] has a tin ear and doesn't know how to use issues
appropriately," the source said.

The Hastert confidant also suggested that the former Speaker was less
than pleased with having to make a choice between either Oberweis or
Lauzen, a longtime political rival. But ultimately "Denny does care
about what happens after he's gone."

The source said the former Speaker picked the more even-handed
Oberweis, who "has better temperament, better judgment and a better
ability to work and get things done for the district."

"Unfortunately the field is one of these two idiots," the source said.
"If you just look at these two, Oberweis is the more practical choice
in that he certainly has a good chance in winning and he's someone
that'll try to work to get some things done and bring people together,
than be a lightning rod all the time."

What’s great about this is Oberweis has his moments of craziness too such as his description of pro-life advocates as the American Taliban. He then turned his entire Gubernatorial race over to Jack Roeser and the crack staff surrounding the Family Taxpayer Network including Matt Barber and Joe Weigand who has a claim to fame of dressing as a chicken to criticize former Gubernatorial candidate and genuinely decent person Jim Ryan.

On the other side we have the thin skinned wonder of Aurora in State Senator Chris Lauzen who most recently went off on the Tribune

State Sen. Chris Lauzen (R-Aurora), who is running for Congress, said he’d planned to go to the Rose Bowl with his wife and family, including one son who is a freshman at USC. But Lauzen said he would call this morning to cancel his order for six tickets.

“I should cancel it, and I’ll take that away from my family too,” Lauzen said.

Lauzen said he did not use a connection to get the tickets, but did call the university president’s office to ask how to go through the process.

“Sure, where else am I going to call?” Lauzen said.

But Lauzen called it “horrible” that “you would judge that there is anything inappropriate.”

“If you’re asking a question, it becomes a story,” Lauzen said.

Lauzen said he made a mistake running for office 16 years ago, saying politics is a “crappy business” that has cost his family millions of dollars.

“So I’ll, I don’t want any more trouble for me or my family,” Lauzen said. “This is really a horrible, horrible business. This is horrible.”

Lauzen also referred to his Republican opponent, Jim Oberweis of Sugar Grove, in the race to succeed former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) in the 14th Congressional District.

“Just think what Oberweis will do with this,” Lauzen said.

Saying he was a “little bit sensitive,” Lauzen provided his home phone number to a reporter who asked how to reached him with any follow-up questions.

“Why don’t you call me at home and then maybe you can talk to one of my family members who won’t be going?” Lauzen said.

Lauzen is the genius who after fighting in a primary over his credentials with another candidate sued the man for defamation and attempted to change his name to Chris Lauzen CPA

His wife wrote a very odd letter on his behalf earlier this cycle

Lauzen, himself, wrote one of the most bizarre open letters to Hastert to encourage him to not endorse anyone in the 14th race.

You have demonstrated through your recent action of early resignation that you wish to set aside the public duty to which we elected you. At first, I was very concerned that your health was failing somehow, and I sympathized with you and your family. But, you have assured us repeatedly that there is no health problem and we are relieved on your behalf.

Many folks express their wonder to me about the apparent necessity to spend $1 Million of taxpayer funds that could better be spent on national security, healthcare, or education, on the March 8, 2008 Special Election. Now that you are stepping away from your official duties, I believe that citizens and voters would be distressed if you reassert yourself and use your considerable clout to influence the outcome of an impending primary.

So really whomever wins the Republican primary, the big winners are the bloggers who get to have fun with these freaks.

ABC NextGen

Lame Title, but nice project with a bunch of candidates for Congress, President, and Cook County States Attorney Submitting videos.

Mark Pera and Bennett both offered up videos for IL-3, but while those are good solid videos about their candidacies, there’s nothing like Art Jones who is, to say the least, off the rails crazy man! With Poetry!   Go check him out and check out the serious ones. Missing-Little Lip.
Let me explain to candidates that if you have a black background, don’t wear a black or dark blue suit–you look like a floating head.  Footlik, Scheurer, and Stein are especially noticeable in this regard.  Also, a guy who owns a lighting company should probably have a properly lit video Bill Foster.

Small thing for ABC–if you want to really make it a good resource, make it so people can put them on other sites like YouTube–I’d post almost all of them if they did so.

It’s That Time

Mark Pera for Congress Header
Help Mark end Santa Dan’s gift-giving to big oil


SantaDan23    Even though the oil companies have  been very, very naughty, Santa Dan Lipinski keeps putting them on the ‘nice’ side of his holiday gift ledger.
    Over the years, he’s voted to give them $8 billion worth of tax breaks and permission to drill for oil in
Santa Claus’ own backyard – the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
    Maybe the reason why
Santa Dan keeps giving gifts to the naughty oil companies is because, instead of cookies, they leave him cash every year, and a lot of it.

In fact, he took $26,000 from big oil between 2005 and 2007.

Help Democrat Mark Pera end Santa Dan’s gift-giving on Election DayContribute Online Graphic by contributing today to our campaign for Congress.

Our goal is to raise more than $26,000, the same amount of  money that Santa Dan took from big oil, by Dec. 31 (not Jan. 31).

For more information or to get involved in our campaign, call (708) 579-2834 or visit www.PERA08.com.

But He’s a Moderate

If you define 1/3 of the population as being the median voter.

Dan Seals Blasts Mark Kirk For Continued Support Of War in Iraq

DEERFIELD, IL—Dan Seals, Democratic candidate in the 10th Congressional District of Illinois, criticized Congressman Mark Kirk today for continuing to support President Bush’s failed policy in Iraq. Monday night, Kirk voted against a spending measure that would increase funding to operations in Afghanistan, while prohibiting those funds from being spent in Iraq. The House approved the measure by a vote of 206 to 201.

 

Not only did Kirk vote to deny additional funding to our troops in Afghanistan, but his vote also signaled that he wants even more money for the war in Iraq

 

“Once again, Mark Kirk is putting partisan politics before principle by continuing to stand with the Bush administration in support of an open-ended engagement in Iraq,” Seals said. “Kirk’s vote is yet another sign that he is more interested in siding with the national Republican Party and the Bush Administration than he is in representing residents of the 10th District who are done with this war.”  

 

“Unlike our current representative, I support a timetable for withdrawal and believe we need to begin bringing our troops home. The 10th district deserves more than empty rhetoric on the war, they deserve a representative with the strength to change the course in Iraq.”

Schock Won’t Attend Videotaped Events

Seriously. What a goof.

I believe we need to make sure Bill has a video camera

State Rep. Aaron Schock won’t permit his two congressional primary opponents to videotape him at any forums or debates.

Well, it’s not that he’s not allowing it, he just won’t attend events if taping is allowed. So the net result is the same.

That’s ticking off the John Morris camp. “I figure if it’s a public forum, I should be able to videotape my candidate,” said Morris campaign manager Ryan Steusloff. “We’re trying to get John out there and I would like to be able to videotape my candidate. There’s nothing nefarious going on.”

So what’s the big deal?

Schock doesn’t believe the intentions are so innocent. “If they’re suggesting that I have something to hide, that’s bogus,” Schock said. “Part of the concern is that it could be taken out of context.”

The issue came to a head at a recent Southwest Kiwanis Club meeting.

A Morris aide showed up with a video camera. But the rules permitted only the media to videotape.

Schock’s camp watched closely to be sure the red blinky recording light wasn’t on while Schock was speaking. There were whispers and stares; finally Morris mouthed for his aide to stop the recording.

“It’s not that they’re doing a public service by taping it and putting it on the Web. That’s not their goal,” said Schock campaign manager Steve Shearer. “What they are there for is to get three or four seconds out of context, and make a TV commercial out of it and that does a disservice to voters.”

This guy is the great GOP hope?

And the two GOP opponents need to tell him to take a hike then and don’t show up at events. They are events open to the public and recording them on videotape is certainly reasonable in such circumstances.

This guy is going to be the picture next to WATB in the dictionary.

In more fun Schock news:

Schock downplayed reports that he would like to see the United States supply Taiwan with nuclear weapons if China does not support sanctions against Iran. Schock made his comments in early November and other candidates criticized the thought of providing other nations with nuclear weapons.

“People were pulling it out of context” and treating it like a serious proposal on foreign affairs, Schock said.

Errr…you own campaign manager claimed it was well thought out. And it wasn’t out of context given Bernard Schoenberg provided the full speech as did both Bill Dennis and I. So again, what a WATB.

He told (Springfield) State Journal-Register reporter Bernard Schoenburg that Schock showed immaturity as he committed a “terrible, terrible blunder” by offering, then retracting, a foreign policy scenario that included the possible sale of nuclear missiles to Taiwan.

He also said GOP candidate John Morris’ statements that millions of illegal immigrants should be deported once the nation’s borders are secure is a “silly solution” that is “not going to work.”

The Peoria congressman also has issues with Schock using his name without permission in campaign materials. He also said he has problems with Schock’s campaign manager.

“On two occasions, in personal meetings that I had with Aaron, I had expressed my concern about his campaign manager,” LaHood told Schoenburg last week about Shearer. Asked if he was referring to campaign tactics, LaHood said, “I guess it’s probably more prudent for me not to get into that.”

Schock said Shearer has run both his winning campaigns for state representative, and he is “very proud of the type of positive campaigns” he’s run.

But here’s the kicker:

Shearer said Schock agreed to endorse Giuliani in the spring, before he knew LaHood was retiring and that he was going to run for that congressional seat. Since then, Schock has said he would remain neutral because he must focus on running his race for Congress.

Small problem. You don’t have to do anything, but endorse the guy. If you don’t think he’s the best candidate, what changed between then and now? It shouldn’t matter whether you are running for office or not.

Mark Kirk R-Torture

Let’s be clear on this vote.  It was a vote against banning a form of torture.  That this vote even had to be held demonstrates how low this administration has taken this country and Kirk is a willing accomplice.  The practice is banned by the military as torture and a violation of the Geneva Convention.  It should have been a unanimous vote.

And given we know people were tortured, it is time to start investigating who and then put them on trial.  War crimes are not acceptable.
Huff Po
Thirty retired admirals and generals have penned a letter to key Democrats, urging them to defy President Bush’s veto threats and pass legislation requiring U.S intelligence agents to follow strict standards for detainee treatment.

December 12, 2007
The Honorable John D. Rockefeller IV, Chairman
The United States Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence
Washington, DC 20510

The Honorable Silvestre Reyes, Chairman
The United States House of Representatives
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Chairman Reyes and Chairman Rockefeller:

As retired military leaders of the U.S. Armed Forces, we write to express our strong support for Section 327 of the Conference Report on the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, H.R. 2082. Section 327 would require intelligence agents of the U.S. government to adhere to the standards of prisoner treatment and interrogation contained in the U.S. Army Field Manual on Human Collector Operations (the Army Field Manual).

We believe it is vital to the safety of our men and women in uniform that the United States not sanction the use of interrogation methods it would find unacceptable if inflicted by the enemy against captured Americans. That principle, embedded in the Army Field Manual, has guided generations of American military personnel in combat.
The current situation, in which the military operates under one set of interrogation rules that are public and the CIA operates under a separate, secret set of rules, is unwise and impractical. In order to ensure adherence across the government to the requirements of the Geneva Conventions and to maintain the integrity of the humane treatment standards on which our own troops rely, we believe that all U.S. personnel – military and civilian – should be held to a single standard of humane treatment reflected in the Army Field Manual.

The Field Manual is the product of decades of practical experience and was updated last year to reflect lessons learned from the current conflict. Interrogation methods authorized by the Field Manual have proven effective in eliciting vital intelligence from dangerous enemy prisoners. Some have argued that the Field Manual rules are too simplistic for civilian interrogators. We reject that argument. Interrogation methods authorized in the Field Manual are sophisticated and flexible. And the principles reflected in the Field Manual are values that no U.S. agency should violate.

General David Petraeus underscored this point in an open letter to the troops in May in which he cautioned against the use of interrogation techniques not authorized by the Field Manual:

What sets us apart from our enemies in this fight. . . . is how we behave. In everything we do, we must observe the standards and values that dictate that we treat noncombatants and detainees with dignity and respect…. Some may argue that we would be more effective if we sanctioned torture or other expedient methods to obtain information from the enemy. They would be wrong. Beyond the basic fact that such actions are illegal, history shows that they also are frequently neither useful nor necessary. Certainly, extreme physical action can make someone “talk;” however, what the individual says may be of questionable value. In fact, our experience in applying the interrogation standards laid out in the Army Field Manual (2-22.3) on Human Intelligence Collector Operations that was published last year shows that the techniques in the manual work effectively and humanely in eliciting information from detainees.

Employing interrogation methods that violate the Field Manual is not only unnecessary, but poses enormous risks. These methods generate information of dubious value, reliance upon which can lead to disastrous consequences. Moreover, revelation of the use of such techniques does immense damage to the reputation and moral authority of the United States essential to our efforts to combat terrorism.

This is a defining issue for America. We urge you to support the adoption of Section 327 of the Conference Report and thereby send a clear message – to U.S. personnel and to the world – that the United States will not engage in or condone the abuse of prisoners and will honor its commitments to uphold the Geneva Conventions.

Sincerely,

General Joseph Hoar, USMC (Ret.)
General Paul J. Kern, USA (Ret.)
General Charles Krulak, USMC (Ret.)
General David M. Maddox, USA (Ret.)
General Merrill A. McPeak, USAF (Ret.)
Admiral Stansfield Turner, USN (Ret.)
Vice Admiral Lee F. Gunn, USN (Ret.)
Lieutenant General Claudia J. Kennedy, USA (Ret.)
Lieutenant General Donald L. Kerrick, USA (Ret.)
Vice Admiral Albert H. Konetzni Jr., USN (Ret.)
Lieutenant General Charles Otstott, USA (Ret.)
Lieutenant General Harry E. Soyster, USA (Ret.)
Major General Paul Eaton, USA (Ret.)
Major General Eugene Fox, USA (Ret.)
Major General John L. Fugh, USA (Ret.)
Rear Admiral Don Guter, USN (Ret.)
Major General Fred E. Haynes, USMC (Ret.)
Rear Admiral John D. Hutson, USN (Ret.)
Major General Melvyn Montano, ANG (Ret.)
Major General Gerald T. Sajer, USA (Ret.)
Major General Antonio ‘Tony’ M. Taguba, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier General David M. Brahms, USMC (Ret.)
Brigadier General James P. Cullen, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier General Evelyn P. Foote, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier General John H. Johns, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier General Richard O’Meara, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier General Murray G. Sagsveen, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier General Anthony Verrengia, USAF (Ret.)
Brigadier General Stephen N. Xenakis, USA (Ret.)

Statement from Dan Seals on Destruction of CIA Interrogation Tapes

DEERFIELD, IL? On Thursday, Dan Seals, Democratic candidate for Congress, criticized Congressman Mark Kirk for supporting the CIA?s decision to destroy videotaped footage of its officers engaging in harsh interrogation techniques against suspected terrorists, including the controversial waterboarding technique.

“Mark Kirk’s defense not only of the use of ‘waterboarding,’ but also the destruction of videotaped interrogations, shows how far he is willing to go to support the Bush Administration and their flaunting of the law,” said Seals.

“I fully support Congress’ investigation into the tape destruction to get to the bottom of whether there was illegal activity or not. This is yet another sign that our country needs wholesale change – from the White House, to our representative in Congress.”

Tonight!

Mark Pera for Congress
December 13, 2007 
Join Mark and state, civic leaders TONIGHT at Cleo’s


Just a friendly reminder from everyone here at Mark Pera for Congress:

Today (Thursday) is the last day to RSVP for our “Reformers for Pera” event tonight at Cleo’s, 2048 W. Armitage Ave., Chicago.


Please click here or on the image below to RSVP via ActBlue, or call (708) 579-2834 and ask for Trevor Montgomery.

2nd ad logo


A great group of political mavericks, including state Sen. Dan Kotowski, D-33rd; state Rep. John Fritchey, D-11th; Chicago aldermen Manuel “Manny” Flores, 1st Ward; Brendan Reilly, 42nd Ward; Scott Waguespack, 32nd Ward and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Commissioner Debra Shore have come together to throw this fundraising event for Mark.

The response to this event has been tremendous and we want all our supporters to be part of what is going to be a terrific night. It will be a great chance to support our campaign and talk to Mark and some of the city and state’s most prominent reformers, all in the beautiful holiday ambiance of Cleo’s.

Joining Kotowski, Fritchey, Flores, Reilly and Waguespack on the host committee are  Stephen Blandin, Emilia DiMenco, Amy Evans and Gail Morse.