ArchPundit

Murphy’s Relentless Hammering

ArchPundit October 21, 2003 No Comments

Patrick Murphy deserves enormous credit for not letting anyone off the hook for Friday’s County Building fire disaster. He said he didn’t care much about whether the mayor’s "cronies" were involved in the retrofit of the building, and he called the governor a politician in "search of a backbone" for saying the matter was none of his business. His day of hammering now means that Mayor Daley is "open" to an independent investigaion.

Open? How about demanding one Mr. Mayor?

But the tangle gets thicker and thicker. Word comes yesterday that one of the partners in the building’s management is Elzie Higginbottom, a long-time friend of Daley and Stroger (and a party fundraiser leading Dan Hynes’s fundraising effort). Stroger said yesterday (from today’s Sun-Times):

Stroger on Monday defended Elzie Higginbottom, a friend of both Daley’s and Stroger’s and owner of one of two companies in the joint venture that manages the county administration building. Stroger said it is not clear management made the controversial call to evacuate the whole building — sending people into the smoky stairwells.

"The management of that building had nothing to do with the fire in that building," Stroger said.

Just like E2, if a friend of the powers-that-be is involved, circle the wagons right away. What could Stroger know at this point? Nothing. And, yes, management didn’t start the fire. But did they handle the evacuation properly? Was the building up to code? Why were the stairwell doors locked? That is why Murphy wants an independent investigation, so that everyone, friends and foes alike, will have to answer tough questions and, if necessary, be held accountable.

Keep hammering Mr. Murphy.

The Mayor and Disasters

ArchPundit October 20, 2003 No Comments

One of the confounding aspects of the Daley administration is its ability to dodge reponsibility for crises in which serious loss of lives occur. Most of the horrific incidents under his tenure involved City or County (which he controls, despite the window dressing of independence) agencies or staff making decisions that at least were part of the scenario that led to the disasters.

Columnist Mark Brown had it exactly right in yesterday’s Sun-Times when he asked about Friday’s County building fire:

"Excuse me, but where was the indignation? Where was the pain? Where was Mayor Daley’s anger?

This was a terribly stupid way for six people to have to died in this day and age, right up there with the senselessness of the E2 nightclub disaster and the Lincoln Park porch collapse. It didn’t have to happen"

And I would add the great Heat Wave of 1994.

It shouldn’t be left to Cook County Public Guardian Patrick Murphy, who lost three staff members in the fire to say (from today’s Sun-Times) that "he wants an independent inquiry board to look into the evacuation and response and takes issue with Mayor Daley’s and Fire Commissioner James Joyce’s contention that nothing went wrong in the response to the fire."

The Mayor always runs to the cover of "nothing went wrong" in the face of disaster. He has never, to my knowledge, expressed any outrage at or held accountable City or County officials for the deaths that occured on his watch that involved city inspectors, emergency response departments or teams, or anyone else.

Could it be that it is beacuse many of the departments where these decisions were made are run by political hacks instead of true professionals. Take James Joyce: he is a member of the Joyce clan that is this/close to the Daleys (relative Jeremiah being one of Daley’s closest political confidants and a regular beneficiary of the City’s largesse). I know Joyce. He is a nice man, but his skill runs to doing only what the Mayor says when the Mayor wants.

I hope that the local press stays on this for months, hammers Daley hard, and brings it up again and again during the next election — a term in Chicago’s mayoral politics I use lightly.

Daley, Teachers, and Money

ArchPundit October 17, 2003 No Comments

Without commenting on whether the CTU members should have accepted the contract put before them, I was struck by Mayor Daley’s comments after the failed vote (cited on the Chicago tribune’s website):

"Where is the money (for bigger raises) going to come from?" Daley asked.

"Public employees have to understand," Daley said. "Taxpayers pay your salaries. They are getting laid off. They are not getting pay increases. … These are very challenging economic times."

Funny, Mayor Daley had no problem finding $400 million in public funds for the new Soldier’s Field.

He had no problem finding over $400 million in public and private funding for Millenium Park.

He had no problem finding the money to tear down Meigs Field.

He has no problem finding millions of dollars each year for trees and flowers.

When it comes to what he wants (which usually involves self-aggrandizement): where there’s a will, there’s a way.

But if he doesn’t care: there’s no money, and there’s no way.

The Numbers Are In

ArchPundit October 17, 2003 1 Comment

And although they look impressive for Hynes, if put within the context of a competitve race, they represent one more disappointment on his way to coronation. Let’s face it, like it or not, this is a competitve Senate race in a State with a very expensive media market and a multimillionaire competitor. So unless one thinks that he is going to handed the nomination, one would need to raise (by looking at similar races in other States) at least $5-6M. And despite what Hynes would have us believe, the "machine" isn’t what it used to be, and it’s not as relevant in a federal race (no jobs to give; no motivation for workers), so it won’t offset hard dollars for media and operations. Raising less than $1M in the quarter before the race begins in earnest, outpacing Obama by a little more than 150K, and not slowing Chico enough to push him out of the race is a real blow, and can’t be spun away. Hynes needs to pick up the pace fast in the dollar race, or he will be forced to narrow the focus of his race either on the Chicago market or downstate, where in both areas he faces very stiff resistance.

Armchairpundit

P.S. I was going to start my guest blog with a comment about the Cubs, but thought it best to let that sleeping dog lie.

It would be best….

ArchPundit October 15, 2003 1 Comment

if I just turn it over to the guest blogger now. I’m very bitter. See you on November 1st. Thanks Armchairpundit.

Holy CofCC Barbour!

ArchPundit October 15, 2003 No Comments

Via Kos
Via Political Wire

Haley Barbour went to the CofCC picnic.

The election year Mississippi Black Hawk Barbecue and Political Rally held on July 19 drew dozens of political candidates and was attended by a crowd of over 500. The Black Hawk Barbecue is sponsored by the Council of Conservative Citizens to raise money for private academy school buses. (Pictured L-R: Chip Reynolds, State Senator Bucky Huggins, Ray Martin, GOP gubernatorial nominee Haley Barbour, John Thompson, and Black Hawk Rally emcee and C of CC Field Director Bill Lord

The dirtbags at the Council of Conservative Citizens are pieces of work. They are unreconstructed racists of the worst kind. How does the GOP establishment justify them?

Let’s look at a couple examples, comparing Bush to Lincoln—in a bad way. By the Mississipi CofCC, the same one Barbour met with. Lincoln is evil to these guys. Why? Figure it out.

Remember these clowns from other issues? You should if you are a regular ArchPundit reader,
My single biggest day of hits came from last December’s article by Joe Conason on Trent Lott and Ashcroft’s ties to the Council of Conservative Citizens.

Link to the original Conason article in the above link. The point being Ashcroft couldn’t have not known that Tom Bugel was scum. Just as Haley couldn’t not know that that scum he is seen pictured with are indeed scum of the worst variety.

But don’t let that stop him from claiming ignorance

The presence of the flag in Barbour’s campaign comes as he aggressively courts support from black voters. The Council of Conservative Citizens, which advocates immigration control and preserving state symbols and has been accused of being racist, uses Barbour’s picture on its Web site. Barbour has said he not only did not know his picture was on the Web site, but also he does not know what the council is.

My ass he doesn’t.

This story has been floating around Jackson since at least September 26th on the Jackson Free Press site.

And guess who else is in the pic? A one Bill Lord, former campaign Chairman in Carroll County, Mississippi to Trent Lott’s Senate campaigns.

The goto place on this stuff is the Temple of Democracy which has started a blog

No permalinks, but it is critical to understand that Lott got nailed for his ties to the CofCC due to attending a Blackhawk Rally a few years ago. Barbour is lying and lying badly.

As Clarification

ArchPundit October 15, 2003 No Comments

I mean all of the jokes about Bartman humorously–no one should bother him, his family, or his employer. In fact, I wouldn’t have named him at all had I had information that wasn’t already widely known publicly. What he did was stupid, but just that and it is a game. Bloviator criticized the media for releasing his information and I think he is right. I won’t get over it though, Ross.

Bartman vs. Cubs

ArchPundit October 15, 2003 No Comments

A more neutral take on Bartman, the spoiler of all that is holy, can be found at Eat Your Vegetables

I’m trying to feel sorry for the guy, but it just isn’t working.

It’s Official Kooky Kathuria

ArchPundit October 15, 2003 No Comments

Kathuria filed a lawsuit against the Trib yesterday.

The lawsuit alleges that Kathuria of Oak Brook could lose $100 million in pending business ventures and future deals if the newspaper is not forced to remove the story from its Web site.

Kathuria also is seeking a court order for the newspaper to post retractions both in print and on its Web site. He also seeks damages in excess of $1.5 million.

"Should I have updated my resume? Yeah, but there’s a lot of old resumes that are around when companies are up and running. It’s a fact of business," Kathuria told reporters. "If someone said they were running a company and it’s no longer around, you just have a new resume. … So at the worst case, sure, I’m guilty of not updating my resume."

First, the suit is a non-starter. It’ll be thrown out–as a public figure his business dealings are fair game. If he didn’t want scrutiny, he shouldn’t have run–regardless of whether the scrutiny is fair.

Second, he is officially relegated to being a fringe candidate from such behavior. Taking the hit, protesting it and moving on would have been a far, far better strategy. Now, he’ll be the kook with a lawsuit againt the Trib.

I’m With Zorn

ArchPundit October 15, 2003 No Comments

If the Cubs lose tonight, I wouldn’t have been able to blog afterwards for two weeks anyway. Zorn gets it right

That Marlins’ 8th inning reeked of history, of pitiful stories we will tell our children’s children in 2045 during the centennial commemoration of the Cubs’ last World Series appearance.

…in aught three, we were cruising along, five outs away from the World Series, when a fan snatched a pop-up from Moises Alou. After that, of course, the floodgates opened and the team’s spirit was crushed….

The announcers and even some of the players who were saying "don’t blame the fan" for Tuesday’s defeat were guessing, at best.

You never know, of course, but the way I see it, if Alou catches that pop up, then we have two outs and Alex Gonzalez doesn’t rush trying to get a double play on the ground ball two batters later, fields it cleanly, and and we’re out of the inning still leading 3-1.

(Speaking of which, if there’s one person in all of Cubdom who’s secretly grateful to the foul-snatching fan, it’s gotta be Gonzalez, whose horrifying bobble is now just a footnote and not a new chapter in team history.)

And when they excuse the fan by saying, as pitcher Mark Prior did after the game, that "99 percent of the people" would have done the same thing, reaching out for a foul ball that close to the field of play, they’re simply wrong.

Most fans, good fans, smart fans know to lean out of the way–scurry if possible — when a guy from their team is running toward the seats with a bead on a foul fly.

And here’s the doubly mortifying allegation from an S-T story this morning:

"In the section where the ball fell….Pat Looney, 34, of the Northwest Side said… the (grabby fan) already had a ball from earlier in the game when Alou tossed one into the stands."

If the Cubs lose game seven tonight, their fans will never forget and never forgive.

It sounds ridiculous and petty, but it’s probably true that this young man will almost certainly have to leave town and start again elsewhere if he wants some semblance of a normal life.

If the Cubs win, he’ll be OK, a footnote himself, just that knucklehead who kept us all on edge for an extra 24 hours.

Not for his sake but for the sake of everyone who’ll otherwise spend the rest of their lives including him in their mutterings about goats, black cats and Leon Durham, I hope it all turns into a jolly anecdote:

…we thought the players would crumble under the demoralizing weight of it all, but, by golly, the next night….