ArchPundit

What’s Great About Roskam on Social Security

Is that he’s attacking her on an issue for which he absolutely refuses to say anything of consequence about except to Grover Norquist and friends.

And for the record–it’s a good ad in terms of effect even if it’s a perfect example of truthiness. It’s exactly the kind of ad that makes Peter seem more moderate and likeable. He’s a movement conservative through and through–his demeanor is probably his biggest assett in defusing that issue.

Exhibit A: Why Americans Hate Trial Lawyers

They sue passengers in car accidents where the passenger is not the owner of the car.

One of my favorite examples comes from

Roskam and Salvi, Attorneys at Law.

The defendant in the case, Jennifer Peeples, was an active duty member of the US Military who was unable to attend an arbitration hearing because she was on active duty. Roskam and Salvi quashed a motion for summary judgment and Peeples had to file a request to not appear. The arbitration went against her from what I follow, but the case then continued for another year.

So Peeples is in the military on duty when she’s sued for an accident in which she wasn’t driving and didn’t own a car in the accident.

Supporting our troops–by suing them for, well, being present at an accident.

Make or Break for Judy

The Levine hearing appears to be the make or break moment for Judy. Either the Levine evidence leads directly to the Governor or it leads to Chris Kelly. To Kelly, it’s more of the same to the average voter. To the Governor, she’s probably alive again.

Just to clarify a poorly written post the other day–I compared MSI to the current scandal and that’s correct in one sense. The allegations are relatively similar and as close to the Governor. There is a huge difference though in that we know there are several investigations going on regarding the Blagojevich adminstration–most notably the hiring scandals that have been turned over to the US Attorney as well.

My point of comparison is not that Rod is no worse than Edgar, it’s that the public pays limited attention to politics and what’s primarily out in the press, especially the television press where most get their information is the Rezko stuff. To most voters then this isn’t a huge deal, but more of the same.

Top that off with a really effective ad campaign making Judy look like she isn’t a saint (she isn’t, but relative to Rod, pretty close) and is out of touch with the average Illinois voter and Rod is rolling to victory barring some bombshell today. I don’t have to like it. I don’t. I don’t have to like that the public doesn’t pay more attention. I don’t. I just recognize what’s going on and while it depresses me, that’s part of being in the reality based community.

BTW, catch Rich’s column today that gives a great illustration of how effective the Blagojevich campaign has been with it’s ads attacking Judy.

And most of this was written before I even read that column so the similarity isn’t due to me copying Rich as much as a similar conclusion about the Levine hearing.

Is Jesse White black?

Who knew? Is he 72?

Ummm…if you are going to lose and are losing this round to build up your name for next round, don’t pull a stunt like this. It just hurts you. Rutherford has a reasonably good reputation amongst Democrats and independents generally like him, but this kind of crappy age baiting race-baiting commercial only gives the Dems ammunition for the next run. Worse, he takes a legit criticism about the family and friends and turns the debate to one about the campaign tactic. Even if you want to argue it wasn’t race baiting and I would like to see a similar family picture held up for a white candidate to show how it’s all irrelevant–it’s just bad campaign tactics.

BTW, Does this mean if McCain gets the GOP nod, Rutherford will be voting Dem?