And a good point about the renovations of Soldier Field
It has been said that the result looks like a spaceship landed on the stadium, a charge I will not endorse for fear of being sued for libel by extraterrestrials. But it is safe to say that the project is the most jarring union of youth and age since Anna Nicole Smith married an 89-year-old billionaire.
Key quote,
"If we started out to build the ugliest stadium in the country for the most money with the fewest alternative uses in the worst possible location, we’re pretty much there."
Dandy.
Bears President Ted Phillips says the new model also has an intimate feel–which is true, and which comes from the fact that seating capacity is nearly 5,500 less than before. With 61,500 seats, it’s the second smallest stadium in the league after the RCA Dome in Indianapolis.In other ways, though, it’s inferior to that facility, which cost just $77 million to erect back in 1984. The price tag on the new Soldier Field is a staggering $632 million, of which $432 million will come from tax revenues. Unlike the RCA Dome, which has been used for everything from the NCAA Final Four to the World Indoor Track and Field championships, this facility is open to the elements, which will limit its uses in a Chicago winter.
Nor does the Soldier Field deal look like a bargain next to other renovations. Green Bay’s recent overhaul of Lambeau Field not only cost less than half as much, but added 11,000 seats. Lambeau offers more luxury boxes and a lot more toilets than Soldier Field. Lambeau also has something that the Bears’ arena traditionally and currently lacks: a winning team.
But the Packers’ lair doesn’t have the distinctions that make the new Soldier Field a true marvel. As University of Chicago sports economist Allen Sanderson puts it, "If we started out to build the ugliest stadium in the country for the most money with the fewest alternative uses in the worst possible location, we’re pretty much there."
Oh, and Bears lose.