November 2007

Pera on ENDA

 Here

As an assistant Cook County State’s Attorney, I have spent the last 10 years ensuring that people are equally protected under the law. I believe it is one of the bedrock principles of our country that every American is entitled to be treated fairly regardless of their age, gender, race, national origin or religion. The Employee Non-Discrimination Act (HR 3685), or ENDA, simply makes it illegal to discriminate against any American in the workplace because of his or her sexual orientation.

No American should be subject to employment discrimination or have their right to work revoked because of sexual orientation.

Congress has a responsibility to ban any form of discrimination in the workplace in order to protect the rights of all workers against the biases of their employers.

Given the opportunity, I would have proudly voted in favor of ENDA as the House approved it yesterday.

ENDA is a landmark piece of civil rights legislation. Its approval tells millions of gay and lesbian Americans that they entitled to the same employment protections as everyone else and that they do not need to live in fear of losing their jobs due to their sexual orientation.

Unfortunately, the Congressman from Illinois’ 3rd District doesn’t believe all Americans are entitled to the rights already granted to them by our state government.

As he has many times in the past, Congressman Dan Lipinski sided with President Bush and the Republicans again yesterday and voted against ENDA. He was the only Democrat in the Illinois delegation to vote against the proposal.

In fact – other than the seven representatives who voted against ENDA on the grounds that it didn’t go far enough – Lipinski was the only northern Democrat, and just one of 18 Democrats overall, to oppose the bill.

While Illinois is one of 30 states that already has an “ENDA” law in place at the state level, Lipinski demonstrated that he does not believe that all Americans are entitled to equal protection under the law and that employment discrimination has no place in our society.

Every American has the right to expect to be treated equally. It is appalling that a Democratic representative from Illinois fails to uphold that fundamental principle.

Morris Weighs in

Via Bill at Peoria Pundit

Republican John Morris, candidate for the 18th District Congressional seat, issued the following statement today: “Being in Congress is a very important responsibility and one has to be very thoughtful in their statements. I support policies that promote freedoms abroad. Congress and our next congressman need to work to make the world safer. My number one priority in Congress will be keeping America and its military strong,” Morris said. “Giving away nuclear weapons is completely irresponsible. The best defense for America and freedom everywhere is for us to remain the strongest power on the face of the earth,” Morris said. John Morris, 39, is a conservative Republican running for United State Congress (IL-18) to succeed Ray LaHood. He and his wife Cindy raise their son Jordan and daughter Taylor in Peoria.

The Innovative Aaron Strangelove

“While I have offered innovative ideas based completely on President Reagan’s successful strategy to end the Cold War, my opponents are operating cynical campaigns of being quick to attack while offering no substance on the issues what-so-ever themselves,” said Schock. “The people are tired of cynical candidates who run for office while avoiding dealing with our nation’s challenges while problems get worse. Our country needs leaders who are willing to address problems instead of waiting until they become a crisis.”

As I mentioned before, the policy he advocates is directly contradicted by the policy of the Reagan administration.  Reagan sought to strengthen the NPT framework and worked towards moving South American nations away from developing nuclear weapons.  To do that , he didn’t threaten China, he used diplomacy.

And More Stupidity

2. Do nothing and allow Iran to continue to flout the will of the International Community by continuing its unrelenting drive to acquire nuclear weapons. Without the third set of international sanctions, Iran will continue to be in a position to have nuclear weapons within a year and become a nuclear terrorist nation.”

So many problems in such a short paragraph.  First, if we were to provide nuclear weapons to Taiwan, we would violate the NPT and be subject to sanctions ourselves.  In addition, if the US were to remove itself from the NPT framework, the entire framework would collapse meaning that such a move would be completely self-defeating.  Schock and Shearer are amazingly ignorant of the entire NPT framework and are trying to enforce it, by breaking it.

Furthermore, no one thinks that Iran will have a nuclear weapon within one year.  The absolute earliest is three years with most thinking it would take until 2015 or later.  And that is to produce one weapon.  One.

Woefully Ignorant

From the Schock Press Release:

“Iran is a regime that has used every weapon it has ever acquired,” said Schock. “I do not intend to go to Congress and sit idly by while Iran gets nuclear weapons. This is a grave threat to our country and it requires tough diplomatic strategy to resolve peacefully without an invasion or war.”

This is perhaps the most misleading statement in a statement full of garbage.  Iran has never utilized biological or chemical weapons.  In fact, it was entitled to use chemical weapons against Iraq when Iraq used them against Iran, but Iran refused and condemned Iraq for using such weapons and then joined the Chemical Weapons Convention in the 1990s.
Furthermore, no one has alleged Iran is trying to develop biological weapons despite the technological ability and the infrastructure existing to do that since Iran has advanced biological research facilities.

There is some question as to whether Iran has sought technologies for these weapons, but most of that centered on being prepared for another attack by Iraq.

So they have only utilized traditional weapons, not WMDs.  Suggesting they have utilized such weapons is misleading and one might conclude, a purposeful lie.

Versace Response

NEWS RELEASE

 

Dick Versace Criticizes Republican Candidate’s Plan to Dish Out Nuclear Weapons to Taiwan

 

“The last thing we need is another career politician who is willing to make dangerous proposals like this one without first considering the consequences”

 

Peoria, IL — Earlier today, one of the Republican candidates running in the increasingly divisive Republican primary in IL-18, State Representative Aaron Schock, made the following remarks:

 

“If China continues to be irresponsible about nuclear proliferation in Iran, we should tell them that if they do not care about proliferation — and since they are enablers of it in Iran — that if they don’t change their position, we will sell Pershing nuclear missiles to Taiwan for their defense.” [Springfield Journal Register, 11/08/07]

In response, Dick Versace, the Democratic candidate for Illinois 18th Congressional District, issued the following statement:

“I’ve traveled across this great district on the Common Sense Express and I’ve heard what’s important to people in this community. Dishing out nuclear weapons to foreign places like Taiwan wasn’t mentioned. After eight years of reckless foreign policies coming from Washington, the last thing we need is another career politician who is willing to make dangerous proposals like this one without first considering the consequences.”

 

Dick Versace led Bradley’s team for eight years and is widely credited with bringing glory to the program. Under Coach Versace’s leadership Bradley dominated the Missouri Valley Conference and made regular trips to the NCAA tournament. In 1982, Coach Versace led Bradley to the National Invitational Tournament (NIT) championship. Dick Versace is appreciative of the opportunities he’s had to live and work in Peoria. He is the proud father of one son, a daughter, and a step-son and he currently lives in Peoria with his wife Vicki.

The Full Embrace of Teh Crazy

Via Bill Dennis, Schock’s entire response:

(PEORIA) Representative Aaron Schock responded to opponent Jim McConoughey’s criticism of Schock’s recent comprehensive proposal to seek ways of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, by pointing out that there are three alternatives:

1. Seek new ways of pressuring China and Russia to heed their UN Security Council responsibilities by voting for the third set of United Nations sanctions on Iran. Sanctions that nearly all foreign policy analysts believe would force the Iranian regime to abandon its nuclear ambitions, or fall from power because of the economic collapse the powerful sanctions would cause inside Iran.

2. Do nothing and allow Iran to continue to flout the will of the International Community by continuing its unrelenting drive to acquire nuclear weapons. Without the third set of international sanctions, Iran will continue to be in a position to have nuclear weapons within a year and become a nuclear terrorist nation.”

3. Go to war with Iran.

“I favor the first option, which is the only option that will resolve the Iranian threat diplomatically and peacefully,” said Schock.

“Iran is a regime that has used every weapon it has ever acquired,” said Schock. “I do not intend to go to Congress and sit idly by while Iran gets nuclear weapons. This is a grave threat to our country and it requires tough diplomatic strategy to resolve peacefully without an invasion or war.”

“It is unacceptable to stand by while our nation is put in a position where the only option to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons is to go to war,” said Schock.

Schock continued, “The fulcrum here is China. We need to introduce new diplomatic prods to China to get them to do what is right. The Chinese are hard to move diplomatically. The one thing that gets their attention is Taiwan. We must have China’s support to enact the sanctions which will end this crisis and it is naïve to think otherwise. The Chinese need to know how seriously we consider the threat of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons. I do not want to sell nuclear weapons to Taiwan, I want China’s cooperation in dealing with Iran.”

The first step in the diplomatic dance that is necessary to prevent Iran getting nuclear weapons is to strengthen our President’s hand in negotiations. My comprehensive proposal on the Iranian threat will undermine the Iranian regime by their own people and get China’s attention to become a partner in stopping this threat from Iran.”

“While I have offered innovative ideas based completely on President Reagan’s successful strategy to end the Cold War, my opponents are operating cynical campaigns of being quick to attack while offering no substance on the issues what-so-ever themselves,” said Schock. “The people are tired of cynical candidates who run for office while avoiding dealing with our nation’s challenges while problems get worse. Our country needs leaders who are willing to address problems instead of waiting until they become a crisis.”

In his news conference today, McConoughey made a stunningly naïve comment when he said it’s not for Congress to play a role in developing foreign policy. If he really believes that maybe he intends to abolish the House International Relations Committee. America’s Constitutional Founders certainly envisioned a role for Congress in working with the President and sometimes Presidents have successfully used tough Congressional proposals as diplomatic weapons to effectively negotiate with adversaries.

The only thing on foreign policy that McConoughey has offered so far in this campaign is to advocate pulling our troops out of Iraq and placing them in Kuwait and Qatar. That is hypocritical considering his comments today that it is not for Congress to play a role in foreign policy. It is also naïve in that it assumes these countries would be willing to host American troops right after America cut and ran in Iraq.

McConoughey is now on record as being soft on Iraq, Iran and China. He is running in the wrong primary.

Embrace Teh Crazy!

Via Rich

.Schock’s campaign manager, Steven Shearer, responded that “academia routinely looked down on President Reagan and ridiculed him when he said that the Soviet Union was going to fall into the ash heap of history.” Reagan’s controversial positioning of Pershing missiles in Europe in the early 1980s “led to the first arms reduction in history,” Shearer claimed.

Rich makes this point:

Here’s the difference: Reagan deployed American missiles to Western Europe, and America controlled those missiles. Selling Pershings to Taiwan means they would control those missiles, not us.

Rich is leaving one important point unstated–this would violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty and destroy the entire international framework for controlling the spread of nuclear weapons.

Oh, and start a war with China.

But let’s go to Ronald Reagan and his views on Non-Proliferation–views I happen to strongly agree with:

President Ronald Reagan lists the following basic guidelines for U.S. nuclear non-proliferation policy:

— The U.S. will seek to prevent the spread of nuclear explosives to additional countries as a fundamental national security and foreign policy objective.

— The U.S. will strive to reduce the motivation for acquiring nuclear explosives by working to improve regional and global stability and to promote understanding of the legitimate security concerns of other states.

— The U.S. will continue to support adherence to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and to the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America (Treaty of Tlatelolco) by countries that have not accepted those treaties.

— The U.S. will view a material violation of these treaties or an international safeguards agreement as having profound consequences for international order and U.S. bilateral relations, and also view any nuclear explosion by a non-nuclear-weapon state with grave concern.

— The U.S. will strongly support and continue to work with other nations to strengthen the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to provide for an improved international safeguards regime.

— The U.S. will seek to work more effectively with other countries to forge agreement on measures for combatting the risks of proliferation.

— The U.S. will continue to inhibit the transfer of sensitive nuclear material, equipment and technology, particularly where the danger of proliferation demands, and to seek agreement on requiring IAEA safeguards on all nuclear activities in a non-nuclear-weapon state as a condition for any significant new nuclear supply commitment.

In fact, Reagan brought China into the framework:

1984

1984 — April U.S.-SINO NUCLEAR TRADE PACT The United States signs a nuclear trade pact with China after Peking agrees to join the IAEA and accept IAEA inspection of any exported nuclear equipment and material. The agreement comes into force December 16, 1985.

Ronald Reagan would think Shearer and Schock are dangerous lunatics.

Don’t Taser Me Bro

Err.. the police blogs and message boards are in a tizzy that people actually criticized officers for tasering an 82 year old woman with a hammer.

It is certainly true that one could use a taser when attacked with a hammer.  However, a 5’1″ 82 year old? There’s a bit of commonsense that says you might be able to disarm her without a weapon.  In or out of use of force guidelines, if you feel horribly threatened by an old woman with a hammer to the point you do not think you can take it away from her, you might have worked with the landlord to get a hold of the family first.

Just a thought.