2006

Good Party

More Press Releases like this please

Now, it just needs to be up here and e-mailed to a broader audience (you can even black out Steve Brown’s phone as I did for that broader audience) (oh, and allow people to do copy and paste with text)

In more fun news…

While a slight embarrasment to the administration, it appears the estimates on the number of kids who will be covered is less than originally estimated, meaning the cost will even be lower. So, Republican candidates—if it doesn’t burst the budget, what’s your position?

And while I’m giving the Party some credit—they are updating the event portion of the web site which is a start at least.

Who Knew the Lipinski’s were so Environmentally Friendly

They sure do like planting things…

Trib on probably new plant in the 3rd Congressional District Democratic Primary (as a bonus, the Trib ran the wrong photograph, again.

Carol Marin jumps in.

The bullshit line from Kelly is that Sullivan is too liberal for that District. It’s a 59% Democratic District in the Kerry-Bush numbers–that’s as Democratic as any Republican District in the entire state is Republican. It’s one message from the Lipinski organization trying to paint themselves as the real alternative.

The problem? Someone needs to ask Dan who he voted for in the 2000 election. By accounts as I understand them he was a Buchanan guy. Dandy, and now he’s running as a Democrat.

Sullivan, who announced last summer, doesn’t like the way Dan Lipinski was anointed by his dad. And doesn’t agree with most of his positions on issues. Sullivan is pro-choice. Lipinski is pro-life. Sullivan opposes the Patriot Act that Lipinski voted to extend. Sullivan wants the United States to get out of Iraq now while Lipinski, though unhappy with the war, believes we can’t do that.

Fine.

The two men offer voters a clear-cut choice.

But a late entry into the race raised Sullivan’s suspicions.

In December, just before the filing deadline, a new candidate emerged. John T. Kelly is his name.

Hmmm, let’s see:

Another candidate named John who has a middle initial “T” that rhymes with Sullivan’s middle initial “P.”

And whaddya know? An Irish last name.

Is John T. Kelly a “ringer”?

Absolutely not, Kelly told me Thursday. What about the charge that some Lipinski loyalists were circulating his petitions? “First of all,” said Kelly, that charge “kind of irritates me.”

Well, then, what about this: Two years ago, weren’t you running in the Republican primary but bailed out, leaving the “ringer” Chlada there to guarantee Dan Lipinski’s victory?

Kelly said he quit the race in 2004 because of family reasons. “I had to drop out,” he told me. “What pissed me off, had I stayed, I would have blown Ryan Chlada away.”

But he didn’t stay. And now that he’s back, Kelly, a 35-year-old financial planner, is running as a Democrat, which he says he really is. He only ran as a Republican in 2004, he contends, because he thought it would give him a clearer shot.

Well, then, you have to wonder why he wouldn’t enlist the same strategy this time around. His Republican opposition now would be two goofy perennial losers, Ray “Spanky the Clown” Wardingley and Art “The Neo-Nazi” Jones.

Good move, Mr. Kelly.

But let’s take this back to Dan Lipinski. He’s really the issue.

Until his dad crowned him a congressman, he spent 15 years out of town working at universities in North Carolina, Indiana and Tennessee. Somehow, while being a resident of other states, he managed to vote here, not by absentee ballot but in person. Election judges in his father’s 23rd Ward marked him present in every Chicago election since at least 1990, according to official records.

Oddly, Lipinski, can’t recall casting those votes. “I’m trying to think back to that time,” he told me. “I honestly cannot remember.”

Such are the mysteries of the 3rd Congressional District.

I can’t explain Dan Lipinski’s voting record any better than he can. And I don’t know if John T. Kelly is a ringer to neutralize John P. Sullivan.

What I do know is that there’s always a game in the land of Lipinski, always a dirty trick or two, even when victory is assured without them.

It’s sad. And it’s stupid. And it plays voters for suckers.

I don’t play the real Democrat card very often because I tend to think the Party is big enough for differences on most issues. However, in this case, Lipinski isn’t a real Democrat, he’s a machine hack who has no business in Congress.

Next effort—find out when Lipinski was teaching on election day–out of state. If so, that’s vote fraud. Many times over.

The Republican War on Science Continues

Funny story. Al Gore got up and gave a speech on global warming before James Hansen spoke while Gore was Vice President. Gore went further than Hansen was comfortable with given the state of the science at the time and essentially rebuked the Vice-President for doing so. The Clinton Adminstration respected that rebuke. Hansen’s career is a testament to an independent scientist in government employ who does his job–evaluating the Earth’s climate.

Unfortunately, the current administration doesn’t see it that way.

Climate Expert Says NASA Tried to Silence Him – New York Times

Trying to paint him as a radical is ridiculous. The offending comments?

The fresh efforts to quiet him, Dr. Hansen said, began in a series of calls after a lecture he gave on Dec. 6 at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco. In the talk, he said that significant emission cuts could be achieved with existing technologies, particularly in the case of motor vehicles, and that without leadership by the United States, climate change would eventually leave the earth “a different planet.”

IOW, as he has often done, he argues that reducing emissions could be done far more cost effectively than many estimates predict.

So now, scientists in the public employ, are having their access to the press restricted

But Dr. Hansen and some of his colleagues said interviews were canceled as a result.

In one call, George Deutsch, a recently appointed public affairs officer at NASA headquarters, rejected a request from a producer at National Public Radio to interview Dr. Hansen, said Leslie McCarthy, a public affairs officer responsible for the Goddard Institute.

Citing handwritten notes taken during the conversation, Ms. McCarthy said Mr. Deutsch called N.P.R. “the most liberal” media outlet in the country. She said that in that call and others, Mr. Deutsch said his job was “to make the president look good” and that as a White House appointee that might be Mr. Deutsch’s priority.

But she added: “I’m a career civil servant and Jim Hansen is a scientist. That’s not our job. That’s not our mission. The inference was that Hansen was disloyal.”

Normally, Ms. McCarthy would not be free to describe such conversations to the news media, but she agreed to an interview after Mr. Acosta, at NASA headquarters, told The Times that she would not face any retribution for doing so.

Miller Said He Was Reagan Like

Universal health care for kids is like the programs the Soviets put into place? All of Western Europe and Canada are now just like the Soviet Union.

Oberweis compares health care to Soviets

The free market is very good at delivering health care to healthy people, but damn those rational actors, it tends to charge more than most can afford when they aren’t healthy.   Rationing by simply a market system results in healthy people getting good health care and unhealthy and old people getting little or no care. Is that what we want?

Rauschenberger Blames Topinka for Alan Keyes

He’s lying or he’s mentally ill. 

Chicago Tribune | Keyes remains hot GOP topic in lieutenant governor race


During a forum before the
Tribune’s editorial board, Steve Rauschenberger, one of the contenders
for lieutenant governor, said GOP governor candidate Judy Baar Topinka
was to blame for Keyes’ candidacy because she was head of the state
Republican Party at the time. But Topinka’s running mate, Joseph
Birkett, noted Rauschenberger was one of the first to push Keyes’ name
as a candidate.

More…

Rauschenberger, a state senator from
Elgin who is the running mate of Chicago businessman Ron Gidwitz, said
Topinka tossed Keyes “under the bus” immediately after the GOP state
central committee selected him to challenge Barack Obama. Keyes,
selected as a replacement after Jack Ryan dropped out of the race, was
beaten by a historic margin.

“She was state party chairman,”
Rauschenberger said. “If you accept leadership of the party and your
party calls a candidate, finding a TV camera to make sure you said that
you’ve washed your hands of your own nominee is not what I call
leadership.”

But Birkett, DuPage County’s state’s attorney,
said Rauschenberger was instrumental in suggesting Keyes to his good
friend and state central committee member, state Sen. Dave Syverson of
Rockford. Rauschenberger later employed top Keyes’ campaign staff
members for his now discarded bid for governor.

“To blame Judy
for all the problems of the party is just unfair. It’s just unfair,
Steve,” Birkett said. “And she is not to blame for Alan Keyes or a lot
of the other problems with this party.”

Later, Rauschenberger
attempted to distance himself from Keyes, saying he only suggested his
name but had no involvement in the campaign. He acknowledged, however,
that he donated $500 to Keyes’ campaign and publicly supported him.


Rauschenberger said Topinka “spent most of her time as state party
chairman talking about the right-wing wackos, as she frequently refers
to them publicly. … And that just happens to be about 65 percent of
her own party base. That’s not unifying.”

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! I recruited a complete loon to run for the US Senate and it’s all the fault of the woman who tried to stop me from jumping off the cliff. 

But really, let’s look at a line that will come back to haunt Rauschenberger for a long time to come:


Rauschenberger said Topinka “spent most of her time as state party
chairman talking about the right-wing wackos, as she frequently refers
to them publicly. … And that just happens to be about 65 percent of
her own party base
. That’s not unifying.”

There are inelegant turns of a phrase and then there are just downright damn funny things politicians say. This is the latter.  So 65 percent of the Illinois Republican Party are right-wing wackos.  All right. 

Even better, according to Syverson, without Rauschenberger’s role, there is no Keyes in Illinois

Some in the party said privately that they view the Keyes candidacy as
Syverson’s baby and they’re preparing to hang a Keyes defeat squarely
on the Rockford senator.

Syverson said Rauschenberger suggested they pursue Keyes, and that
the move was backed by Fitzgerald. Syverson said he and U.S. Rep.
Manzullo, R-Egan, were the first to reach out to Keyes, an account
confirmed by Manzullo spokesman Rich Carter.

“Rauschenberger called me and bounced the idea off of me,” Syverson
said. “I called Manzullo. Manzullo was ecstatic about the idea.
Manzullo called Keyes. And I called Keyes. We both talked to him. We
shared our concern and asked whether he’d be willing to come and help
Illinois through its difficult time.”

RAUSCHENBERGER SAID the notion of picking Keyes was planted by Dan
Proft, president of the conservative newsletter Illinois Leader.
Rauschenberger said Proft, who worked for Jack Ryan’s campaign, called
him and suggested Keyes after the Democratic National Convention
propelled Obama to superstar status.

“He said, ‘Why don’t we find somebody who could go toe to toe with Barack Obama?’,” Rauschenberger said.

How could poor Steve know Keyes was a loon?

This link might give you a few people who predicted pretty much what happened–it includes me

Who would have thunk that a guy who handcuffed himself in a television studio to get attention for being excluded would be a bit erratic? 

Check out the advertisers

As always, if an ad interests you, please take a look–SoapBox Chicago is to the right and is really getting a good momentum going on…

The AFSCME spring break is a great idea for students out there. 

DCCC and DSCC both have Abramoff themed ads up–in some extra fun, Santorum is denying any connection to the K-Street project.  Personally, I can’t tell you how strongly I support Roy Blunt for Majority Leader. He’s just good for bidness.

Finally, a new book on the right–one I’m not familiar with, but it looks interesting. 

Henry Was Ahead of the Game

Over at OneMan, Henry had this to say about the AFSCME non-endorsement

I think this might actually help Blagojevich in the general election.
He can show that he is in fact no friend of government and government
employees and he is being careful with state funds. He can rail against
bureaucrats and the like and talk about how he has shrunk government.

Trib’s editorial on the non-endorsement

That’s not the view here. What
Blagojevich did was right and it was essential. State government had to
become leaner and more efficient precisely so tax dollars would be more
carefully directed at state services.

It will be worth watching
to see if other candidates try to wink and nod their way to support
from the state’s largest public employees union. The state can’t start
reassembling the vast workforce it once had. Blagojevich won’t be abl e
to trumpet an AFSCME endorsement in his campaign ads. But 12,000 job
cuts and $800 million in savings? Now there’s something he can run on.

Oh, Yeah, the Debate link

You can watch it here

Overall, a big win for Oberweis who came across as commanding, reasonable, and hit Republican primary voters right about their midpoint.  If you didn’t know this was his third run, you’d wonder where this guy had been.  I may be rethinking my handicapping of this race if he can pull off another performance like this. 

Brady was good, but overshadowed by Oberweis. 

Gidwitz needs to stop wasting his money. See previous posts for more.

Judy was okay, but even with her quirkiness seemed to be a wallflower.  Not as strong of a prescence as I expected to see from her and the quirkiness wasn’t as amusing as it often is. 

Oops, wrong venue

Oops, I was about to mention this tidbit about the Duckworth DC fundraiser being at a lobbying firm, but Sweet’s column got a pretty quick reaction.  While there’s a hubbub about the mainstream media around the blogosphere–and legit complaints about many, there are also many in the media who deserve credit. Sweet is one of those who plays it pretty straight and even when nitpicking on some of the Obama decisions regarding fundraising, she does it to keep pols honest.  That’s her job.  And this is a perfect case where those holding the event should have thought about it before scheduling it. 

Many lobbyists do good work so slamming them as a class isn’t entirely fair.  However, it’s also really stupid to forget that they aren’t looking out for your constituents, but a specific interest.  Tying yourself too closely to them results in confusion over what their role is–and the K-Street project is a perfect example of politicians and lobbyists confusing their roles as having the same goals.  It leads to really bad things…like Tom DeLay.