Semantic Vandalism continued Some of

Semantic Vandalism continued

Some of the more hysterical bloggers are calling Muhammed a terrorist and suggesting that the supersecret treehouse cool people connect the dots. Maybe so, but before applying this label could someone point out what his political message was? Until one can do that it would seem that asking for $10 Million was a motivation unto itself.

I’ve connected the available dots so far and I’m seeing a home grown loon. Now, it could be more, but why don’t we let the evidence that comes out determine our conclusions? Or are the dots only seen in the supersecrettreehouse black light?

By the way, in the sniper case I was wrong when I made a crack about it being a kooky white guy. My mistake. If there turns out to be a terrorist connection I will gladly post a retraction for a week straight.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *