Uncategorized

New ANWR Strategy

From Greenwire:


The incoming chairmen of the Senate Budget and Energy committees said Tuesday they may try to move Arctic National Wildlife Refuge drilling provisions early next year as part of the FY ’04 budget reconciliation bill. If pursued, the strategy means Republicans could circumvent Democratic filibuster threats to open the Alaskan refuge with only 51 votes, as opposed to having to muster the 60 votes necessary to overcome a filibuster.


Because reconciliation bills cannot be filibustered, and because Senate Democrats have guaranteed to block ANWR, attaching an Alaska drilling provision to the reconciliation bill appears to have emerged as the ideal strategy for Republicans who have long been frustrated by procedural tactics in the Senate. ANWR passed Congress in 1995 as part of reconciliation only to be vetoed by then-President Clinton. But this time around, President Bush eagerly awaits the domestic policy victory he could ultimately claim if ANWR passes the Republican-controlled Congress.

If Republicans choose to roll ANWR into a reconciliation package, the primary obstacle standing in the way is the Senate parliamentarian, who has to rule in favor of including ANWR as "a substantial revenue measure," according to a Senate rule called the Byrd Rule that limits how policy gets included in reconciliation bills. If the parliamentarian rules against ANWR, the Senate needs 60 votes to bypass the Byrd Rule, but all indications point to ANWR passing the test, as it did in 1995, because of the billions of dollars in federal oil royalties the refuge would potentially net.

The question is are there 50 votes + Cheney. I don’t think they do. Reconciliation bills can be amended.

Democrats voting for ANWR
Miller
Akaka
Inouye
Landreau
Breaux

Republicans voting No
Smith-NH
Smith OR
Snowe
Collins
Chafee
Dewine
Fitzgerald
McCain

The vote was 54-46

Now, we lose three votes clearly:
Carnahan
Smith-NH
Cleland

Gain 1
Pryor

Leaving us at 50-49 against drilling.

Coleman has claimed to be opposed to drilling. Or will he flop? Terrel-Landreau is irrelevant because they are both for drilling.

One possibility is it gets stuck back in a conference committee and then he votes ‘to move the budget forward’ like a weasel. But on the face of it, and if Norm keeps his promise, ANWR drilling doesn’t pass.

No pressure to overreach

When you win a close one, the conventional wisdom is to stay in the center. Fortunately, centrifugal forces counteract the rush to the middle and one of those centrifugal forces is Phyllis Schlafly. For those expecting a latino resurgence in the Republican Party, Ms. (I couldn’t resist) Schlafly throws some cold water on immigration.

More fun is:


But 89 percent of the nation’s children attend public schools, Schlafly added. "If they turn out to be illiterate little savages who don’t know right from wrong – we need to care about what’s being taught."

Semantic Vandals Strike Again

Calpundit takes issue with Reynolds again, but he really misses the greater problem with the post.

From the article Reynolds is commenting on:

We face, now and for the foreseeable future, the threat of a new barbarism. The new barbarians, like those of old, consist of groups in which every member is a potential warrior. Like their predecessors, the new barbarians rely on their ability to outmaneuver their civilized adversaries, to concentrate deadly force at vulnerable spots. But unlike the old steppe nomads, the new barbarians seek neither booty nor conquest. Our new barbarian adversaries pursue a strategy of pure and perfect nihilism: They seek destruction for destruction’s sake. Their strategy, in other words, is terrorism.

Pure and simple claptrap. Al Qaeda has specific goals and they use terrorism to obtain those goals. They don’t use terrorism for destructions sake, they use it to obtain political goals. Using violence against civilians to obtain political goals is generally the definition of terrorism. Writing garbage for the sake of drama should consign one to the category of drama queen and not serious commentator.

Blogging recommendation

As most of you visiting have probably figured out, I recently moved my site to Blog Studio (if you need a link to figure out how to get to the home page–just don’t bother). I am very, very pleased with both their interface and hosting. And it is all for $15. Even better, they are going to be adding stats to the paid sites soon. If you are tired of Blogger and all of the problems with it, consider giving Blog Studio a try. Most features can be tried out for free.

Right Wing Paranoia

My favorite group of wingnuts have moved beyond the election and are now complaining about the passing of the Conservation and Reinvestment Act. The writer seems (seems because her argument is heavy on allusion and light on substance) to think the Constitution doesn’t allow government to take land. Actually the Constitution is quite clear in allowing the government to take land, but compensation is required when the government does so.