Uncategorized

Is Fred Phelps Ready to Implode?

Fred Phelps, the odious hatemonger who runs Godhatesfags.com, should be crisscrossing the US having coniptions about gay marriage, but it appears from his schedule he is staying close to home until a visit to New Paltz, New York. Interesting choice, you’d think a man so sure of himself might go to San Francisco to really confront gay marriages. Or is he afraid? Sort of like the old Eddie Murphy joke, “The Klan needs to come to the ghetto–we need the sheets”.

Fred’s minions visited my church a few years ago and the primary response was one of pity for them.

Missouri Stuff

I generally don’t worry about whether people find their way over to Blog Saint Louis–my other blog. But it’s been a big couple days

—School Board Member is arrested for dumping water over the head of a senior administrator:
Arcticle One
Article Two
Article Three
Article Four

—Russ Carnahan, Candidate for Gephardt’s Seat has an office outside of the District he is running in:
Article 1
Article 2

Kit Bond is below 50 percent in a Nancy Farmer Poll

Two Candidates for State Lege Receive Endorsements of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund

Controversy Erupts over a proposed Homeless Shelter in Downtown St. Louis

Over 20% of Missouri School Districts are looking at referendums for bond issues or tax increases on April 6th

The Missouri Republican Party Cries Wolf over an ad campaign by the Dems.

Very soon Blog Saint Louis will be housed here with the main ArchPundit site, but I thought at least a couple stories would be interesting to regular readers this week.

Let Me Assure You

The great thing about campaign season is it brings out favorite memories. Currently there is a heated race between Republicans for the seat once held by Pate Philip. Carole Pankau did not receive an endorsement, and the Trib said about her, ”
Pankau is an energetic campaigner, but her 11-year record in the House is modest.”

This is true, but a little anecdote tells the full degree of the problem with Pankau. Pankau filed HB 0584 during the 90th Legislative Session. The Bill would have eliminated the observance of Daylight Savings Time in Illinois.

Lots of bills are filed and don’t get much attention and this was one of them, until some guys in a softball league heard about it. You see, softball leagues play at night and someone has to pick up the tab for lighting after dark. If daylight savings time was eliminated, costs for softball leagues would skyrocket.

Now we have an issue. The concern goes up the flagpole to the House Democrats who have lots of softball playing constituents. A random legislative analyst gets the bill plopped on his desk and can’t figure out what the hell is going on. So he chats with the softball people and figures out it is a problem. Fair enough–it affects them if it passes, but they don’t for the life of them, know why the bill has made an appearance.

So random legislative analyst calls up the Bill’s sponsor, one Carole Pankau. The following is a paraphrase of the conversation.

RLA: Hello, I’m curious about this bill you’ve sponsored to eliminate daylight savings time. We are getting a lot of flack from softball leagues because of the increased cost to them if it were to pass. Why are you sponsoring the bill?

Pankau: Really, I’m just curious who would oppose it. I don’t know who is for daylight savings time so I thought I’d run this up the flagpole and see what happened.

RLA in his mind: No big deal, Lege members do this sort of stuff when they are bored. It is far from the dumbest question he’s heard lately.

RLA: Okay, so, ummm….well the softball players are against this so we’d really like to maybe take care of it if we could.

Pankau: Well, it’ll work its way through the process.

RLA: Yeah, but see we’d like to see it just go away. Could you withdraw it from consideration since you don’t have a compelling interest in the issue?

Pankau: No, I’d like to see what happens in committee.

RLA: Are you going to push the bill?

Pankau: No, but I want to see who opposes it.

RLA: Well, softball players and parks people are very upset about it.

Pankau: Yes, I understand.

Pankau: Let me assure you that this bill will not change the total number of daylight hours in any given day.

RLA to himself: I’m sure that wasn’t what she meant–just an awkward phrase, right?

RLA: I see your concern, but we’d really like to put this to bed.

Pankau: Let me assure you that this bill will not change the total number of daylight hours in any given day.

RLA: Well….thanks for talking to me. (hangs up phone)

The bill was then killed in a fake committee that never met, but had to be created because she didn’t withdraw the bill

(minor errors might be in the above because it relies on memory, but the money quote is dead on)

Roe V. Wade, 7 of 9, and Jack Ryan

For those who believe Roe v. Wade is safe, the bombshell release of late Justice Blackmun’s papers should be a wake-up call. A turnover of two is all it will take. Already we know that Justice O’Connor would like to step down, but doesn’t feel she can until a second Bush election. In addition, Justice Stevens is 84 years old. While still sharp as a tack, he is 84 years old. Justice Ginsburg has also had serious health problems, though she appears to be fine for now.

2 votes from overturning a 7-2 opinion from only 30 years ago. If anyone is naive enough to think Jack Ryan would be a harmless conservative who really cares, ask yourself how much he cares about women’s health and autonomy if he is supporting this President’s wish to radically alter the balance of power on the Supreme Court. Despite protestations from social conservatives, the current Court is skewed to the right with only one true liberal on the bench–Ginsburg. 7 of 9 is often linked to Jack Ryan for other reasons, but let’s link this stat to him now–7 of 9 Supreme Court Justices were appointed by Republicans. That is an unhealthy balance. Let’s make sure we even it out.

St. Clair County Blues II

Washington Park is considering filing for bankrupty. Apparently relying on brothe…err strip clubs for your revenue stream is not a winning strategy. Who knew?

Dan Hynes office is all over it and trying to whip them into shape. That is good news given many Comptrollers would have considered letting them slide to win favor with local pols for primary support.

How bad is Washington Park right now?

Earlier, a village worker took out a $3,500 cash advance on her credit card to complete the funding of a library literacy program when the state in December withheld the final part due to past debts.

St. Clair County Blues

It’s been a while, but let’s revisit everybody’s favorite county in Southwestern Illinois.

Another tussle has broken out in East St. Louis over the school board. Lonzo Greenwood was ousted as President of East St. Louis District 189 School Board by the state financial oversight board. It would appear the Mr. Greenwood felt he would unilaterally extend the food service contract.

The state-appointed panel voted Wednesday to remove Greenwood from the board for his involvement in extending the district’s $3.4 million food service contract with Sodexho. After the oversight panel held a hearing with Greenwood, it determined that he acted improperly when he signed a letter in 2002 extending the Sodexho contract for an additional three years.

When the School Board decided to seek bids in 2003, Greenwood produced the “letter of understanding” that he had signed in 2002. Sodexho ultimately was not the lowest bidder in 2003, but the district ended up extending the company’s contract through this school year.

The panel said Greenwood should have presented the letter of understanding for approval of both the oversight panel and the School Board. The situation is another example of the lack of internal financial control in the district, said Richard Mark, chairman of the panel.

The reality is that the East St. Louis Board lacks the capacity to run its own schools currently. There are people who could–Percy Harris is one of them, but he isn’t going to be elected and he isn’t crazy enough to run even if he could be. A full state takeover would be a far better answer for the children of East St. Louis.

The Other Side of the Coin

From a reader:

"Orders of Protection" are not at all unusual in a divorce proceeding in Illinois, particularly when a lot of money is at stake. This is a not a "No Fault" divorce state, so divorces can be hotly contested even between amicable parties. This could have been the scenario: Hull’s wife changes the locks on the house, puts his clothes on the sidewalk, and gets an Order barring him from entering the property. Suddenly possession of the house becomes her’s until the matter is settled, and possession is 9/10ths of the law — literally. Hull shouldn’t have to respond because he has children and grandchildren who love him and don’t need to relive a difficult time, just because he hasn’t lived the now-conventional life of the aspiring politician (squeeky-clean, all the right schools, degrees, jobs, etc.). One of the things that attracts me to Blair is that he is a true citizen-politician. He has lived a real life, full of successes and failures (some ugly). I’d rather him than some bubble-born child, scrubed since childhood, whose career choice is a life in government, and wouldn’t know a real-life problem if it smacked them in the face.
======

While I disagree with the notion that he shouldn’t have to release the information, I think the above makes a good point about
1) not prejudging the situation
2) understanding that everyone is not perfect

I think the best strategy at this point is to wait for Monday.

Hull Statement

Zorn reports on the Hull Campaign reaction to the Trib’s request to release the forms:

Your request… enters into Blair and Brenda’s most personal and private lives, and affects not only Blair and Brenda, but their children as well. These, and other family members, who are not public figures, need to be advised of your request, and their privacy concerns must be considered. It will take until Monday to give everyone in both families the opportunity to consider their options and be apprised of their rights

Eric reinterprets it as evidence of stalling. Perhaps, perhaps not. Eitehr way, giving Monday as a deadline is actually promising. Instead of drawing it out, they give a statement that effectively kills the story until more information is available. Either they won’t release which keeps the story alive, or they do and the story lasts probably not much more than a cycle with full disclosure.

Now let me give my lecture to people considering entering the political realm at the Congress or above level (and even lower if you are going to face a tough race). Be ready for your life to be public. Don’t like it? Get over it or don’t run. Before you get very far, find a political professional and confess your sins. Tell them everything. Then plan how to release any embarrassing information before it comes out by the press. That way, you can control the story.

The worst thing is to let it hang there for a while or surprise you at the last minute. We are still talking about the President’s military record four years later and on the eve of the election a DUI from 25 years ago came out. Now which was worse? Releasing it in 1994 during his first run for Governor or the public finding out just before the election? I thought so.