Uncategorized

Log Cabin Republicans Fight The Ban Gay Marriage Amendment

The Democratic Party has some work to do on this, but come’on, isn’t it time to just jettison the Republicans at the national level?

Kudos to Baar Topinka for trying to knock it down in the Illinois Republican Party, but I am guessing it could be her downfall in the 2006 Gubernatorial Primary.

Madigan is blocking a statewide amendment.

At the Illinois state level traditional family groups have worked with a conservative downstate Democrat to introduce an amendment to the state constitution confirming marriage as between one woman and one man. But the legislaton has not emerged from the House Rules Committee.

According to House Speaker Michael Madigan’s (D-Chicago) spokesman Steve Brown, the issue is not a high priority to the public, and it won’t be in the General Assembly this session, either.

Now, class when it does emerge from Rules where is it going to go? A committee to nowhere is where. For the time being the key is to keep this garbage from coming up until the fight can be won.

The Not Present Votes

While I tend not to get charged up about campaign barbs, let’s make one thing clear, if you didn’t vote at all, you don’t get to criticize others votes.

Blair Hull’s biggest scandal should be that he hasn’t vote regularly. While I’m uncomfortable with the language surrounding the divorce issues, ultimately we have no evidence of a pattern of behavior. I doubt any of us would want to be judged by our worst days.

However, voting matters a lot. I can forgive not voting in some cases, but even in voting for John Edwards in the primary, I remembered he only eratically voted before 1998. Hull has a similar record as does Cheney. Cheney really blows my mind, but frankly him not voting is a good thing.

Voting matters and it matters a lot. As I’ve mentioned before, voting was like a religion in my family and the only elections I have missed are when I’ve moved within the 30 days of an election and two special elections involving one office where I hated everyone. I’ve voted more at the age of 32 than either John Edwards in his forties or Blair Hull in his sixties. Hell, I probably voted more than both of them by the time I was 22.

A single vote isn’t that important. Despite the little booklets that trot out statistics about where one vote might have mattered, even in Florida one vote didn’t matter one way or another. Except on the Supreme Court.

That leaves open why I see voting as so essential. Voting is the simplest manner in which we participate in our freedom which is unmatched in the history of the world. To not vote is to reject the sacrifice of those before us and to take our freedom for granted.

This isn’t an issue of the far past. Forty years ago African-Americans fought for the right to vote and participate politically. The were not fully Americans. Registering and showing up just isn’t that hard for a nation as privileged as we are.

Thirteen years ago, I travelled to Nicaragua for a college class. Pretty cool for a kid raised in a trailer and apartments by a single mother. While many things struck me, the most moving were three different women who told their stories of being raped by Somoza’s National Guard or Contras for nothing more than promoting democratic reform. After those incidents, those women went on to continue their fight for democracy. One worked providing training to women that would enable them to hold jobs. Another was a legislator. How can we treat something so special so flippantly that people suffered for so greatly?

I don’t weed out candidates on this issue alone. Certainly honesty and ideology are vital and I can overlook that mistake. But why should I trust someone to represent me when they wouldn’t even represent themselves?

Now, for something completely different…Is Martha Stewart on In Chicago?

Okay, Ms. ArchPundit has her knickers in a twist. Martha has been pulled off TV here in St. Louis and this breaks her morning in a way she doesn’t like. Is Martha still on in Chicago?

I’m a bit confused at to the reasoning here–aren’t there lots of folks on TV who have histories with the law? NBA basketball players (not Kobe-he hasn’t been convicted), Kelsey Grammer (who shouldn’t be on for many reasons starting with he isn’t funny), Marv Albert, etc….

For those who are curious as to why there is this sudden departure from Senate issues–homelife was tough yesterday. Martha is very important in the household. It is bad enough on those days when they interrupt Martha to update the world on the ArchBishop’s prostate surgery as they are wont to do.

ArchPundit Endorsement: For Cook County Prosecutor

Duh, Richard Devine. The Tribune’s endorsement covers the essentials.

Devine has an excellent record and most importantly played a key role in the compromise over death penalty reform working with Obama to obtain a pilot program for police taping of interrogations. While slow in a few cases of questionable convictions he has not grandstanded like his moronic neighbor in DuPage and he has accepted that mistakes occur. He has had to sit out the Burge investigation, but he is honest and decent. And I hear he has a new grandchild!

What the Hell is a Pantagraph

Well, in my youth it was a right wing reactionary rag that screwed up every story it printed. The single best example was the bold headline “Satanic Worship Comes to Central Illinois” on the front page. The story asserted that satanic worshippers had killed a sheep and who knows what else. About a week later a second page retraction was printed noting that a farmers dog had simply had a snack one day. Details.

The joke was that along with the Post Amerikan, Bloomington-Normal residents were blessed with the single worst right wing paper and the single worst left wing paper. Since then the Pantagraph has been sold to the Pulitzer group and has improved.

But what is a Pantagraph? The Pantagraph reports:

The Pantagraph’s name is derived from the Greek words “panta” and “grapho,” which have a combined meaning of “write all things.” Charles Merriman is the man responsible for giving The Pantagraph its name. In the words of Merriman, the name is “a perpetual injunction upon its editors to dip their pens fearlessly into all matters of human interest.” When Merriman named The Pantagraph on December 1, 1853, he was a co-owner of the paper with Jesse Fell. The Pantagraph’s previous name was “The Intelligencer.”