Illinois Senate

For The Republican Nomination: Rack One More Up for Steve!

ArchPundit heartily endorses Steve Rauschenberger for the Republican Senate Nomination in Illinois. Let’s not get confused here, Steve is far more conservative than I and I would not vote for him in the general election. But I would get closer to voting for him than I would anyone else in that field with only Borling coming even close to Steve.

The Republican field is full of people with little public experience who seem to think it would be neat to be a Senator so they are throwing money at the possibilty of being a big important person. Good for them. But this is one of the most unqualified and unserious field of candidates I have ever seen. Two have any legislative experience–or elected experience and one of them was an appointment. One other has given admiral service to his country in the US Air Force. The others? A gadfly dairy owner. A gadfly Doctor. An industrialist who has the sole distinction of giving money to the party over time. And a stock broker who teaches high school, but is clueless in regards to his own party and state. The last will wait for a more full treatment as Illinois is about to be subjected to him for 8 more months.
Read More

Illinois Democratic Senate Cattle Call 3-9

1. Obama. Polls and buzz and momentum. Good place to be one week out. Needs to ensure the turnout stays high. From comments Trib has him at 62% in the A-A community. Given black voters are late deciders even with an African-American in the race, that probably breaks for him even better. Some inroads by Hull with Rush, but that is at the margins. And his supporters even buy time on ArchPundit! See to the right!

2. Hynes. Number 2 in the polls, but desperately needs to make inroads downstate and have good turnout. Biggest problem–just not as passionate of a following. Read comments on the cattle call comment period for good takes on where he needs turnout especially. Perhaps hamstrung by playing it too cute with social conservatives down south. That wing of the Democratic Party is dying while South Chicago is being transformed demographically meaning that tension will be come less and less. Another thing to note is that Lane Evans operation is behind Obama. That won’t help along the southern edges of the Illinois River where Lane is new, but in the Quad Cities and even in Lane’s new territory in Decatur, that should marginally help Obama and hurt Hynes where Labor is the Democratic Party.

3. Hull. Pretty much Glenn Brown and I have agreed on most of these cattle calls, but here I part with him. We have him in the same position, but I think he is rebounding a bit, while Glenn thinks he is falling. If he falls, Hynes gets stronger downstate where he has commercials. If he rises, Hynes gets weaker. Hull should be increasing slightly for the rest of the campaign. The question is whether it will be enough to get into a turnout contest on election day. If it is, he has a reasonable shot. The problem appears to be an undercurrent of the remaining undecideds think several candidates are good, but the best news is for Obama where they are slightly trending. Hull needs something to intervene. THe problem being the press is in love with Obama (or not a problem if you are a Obama supporter).

4. Pappas. Probably maintain where she is at. Unless the campaign commercials have more of an effect than I’d predict she is probably stuck in fourth. As a note, they are supposed to be on the air in St. Louis, but I haven’t seen them yet–of course, I’m probably not the target audience. I think the campaign won’t hurt her as much as it could. The debate performances were a problem, but I think this race has been hard to break out of and that will be the media consensus. Both Chico and her are decent candidates, but shut out of the media by Hynes, Obama and the Hull media explosion. The best quotes from her were about the Hull media explosion.

5. Chico. Perhaps supporting Guitierrez’s opponent wasn’t so smart. Interesting to see how he does in Latino wards.

6. Skinner. There is this new liberal radio network….

7. Washington. Web site is back up. Don’t know why.

3.

Illinois Republican Senate Cattle Call 3-9

1. Jack! Glenn suggests in comments that he was bribed to not put him at number one by Jeri. As if. But I’m really running out of material here. Jack! is really about the funniest nickname I can come up with–in fact it is damn hilarious the more I think about it.

2. Rauschenberger. I don’t need no steenking polls. Steve is smart the rest are dumb and need to be eliminated from the island. Really, I do expect that if anyone gets late breakers it’ll be him or Jack!

3. Oberweis. He brought in Tancredo (Loony Bin Party Label-Colorado). Thank you, I didn’t think he could be any more ridiculous. Tancredo is the primary anti-immigrant guy in Congress and general comic relief. They fit well together. With any luck Tancredo will run in Colorado and lead to the biggest turnout of Latinos for Democrats ever. Udall is in, that would be a nice pick-up. Really, the Colorado race is more fun than this one anymore.

4. McKenna. The Wonder Bread of WASPs.

5. Borling. By the end of this, him and Rauschenberger will be number one and two simply because I can’t stand it anymore. If you are going to lose, slap the whippersnapper around a bit more on foreign policy.

6. Jonathan Wright. Makes Pat O’Malley look reasonable and sorta like a compromiser. Big star of the future. Look for him to challenge for one of the statewide races in 2006. My guess is he might take social conservative hatred of all things moderate and make that a campaign in the primary against Dan Rutherford.

7. Kathuria. NEW POLL SHOWS U.S. REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE, DR. CHIRINJEEV KATHURIA, STATISTICALLY TIED FOR SECOND PLACE

I can’t make that stuff up.

Undecided Dems and Momentum

So what I’m hearing in the background is that there are a bunch of undecideds in the recent polling that seem to be moving towards Obama, but they aren’t hardcore supporters. Instead they are moving towards him half-heartedly because he is the front-runner (last part is my interpretation). While they are swayable, good news begets good news and so Obama is doing better because he is, well, doing better. Obviously a campaign bombshell of some sort might change this, but in many ways this is what probably would have happened for Hull had he begun to pull away and not had the divorce scandal break. As people break, more people break with them. And the Corzine model would have propelled him to an unshakeable lead. Instead, his momentum was stopped and he is having to rebuild. He increasingly faces an uphill fight while Obama needs to ride the wave of good media.

I still think the wild card is downstate though with Hynes and Hull needing it to break one way or another.

Present and Accounted For

At this point in a campaign cynicism sets in for me and I pretty much take the charges flying around as ‘the game’. But Eric Zorn offers a powerful counterpoint to the claims that Obama has avoided votes on abortion.

“To provide cover for other Democrats who were shaky on the issue in an effort to convince them not to vote `yes,'” Sutherland said. “The idea is to recruit a group to vote `present’ that includes legislators who are clearly right with the issue.”

Sutherland said this tactic makes the “present” vote look less like a hedge or a cop-out and more like a constitutional concern or other high-minded qualm.

She pointed to the Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 2001, a bill requiring that an adult family member be notified 48 hours in advance when a minor seeks an abortion.

The complaint seems to me to be the equivalent of complaining about fake committees created to kill bills. Being more familiar with the House, bills problematic for certain blocks of Members are sent to an ad hoc committee by Rules. The ad hoc committee never meets, the bill dies. If one was to complain that the chair never even chaired the meeting, you would laugh them out of the room because Da Speaker told them not to meet–well actually Steve Brown told them not to meet, but you know.

UPDATE: I just read the Hotline and I did not take the Title from them. Really! In fact, I think I had this up first.

Interesting Analysis on Hynes

Springfield Dem is known for coming out of left field, dropping amazing analysis and then disappearing again. Let’s hope he doesn’t disappear again after this gem in comments

I still have Hynes 3rd, with Pappas threatening to overtake him. His campaign is listless, message-less, and he doesn’t even benefit from the organization he’s had in the past. Hynes’s organizational strength — in my opinion — is being greatly over-estimated this time.

While Hynes got the AFL-CIO endorsement — it was an inside baseball play using parlimentary rules and the muscle of Ed Smith and Laborers International to mask the fact that Obama already had the support of — SEIU, IFT, and AFSCME — not coincidentally the three of the biggest money and manpower producing unions in the state.

Hynes’ organization is limited to South side irish wards, and the Southwest suburbs organization built by Madigan/Tom Hynes in the 90’s to control House races. Downstate — he’s basically got Metro East locked down. Beyond that, Hynes is relying on name ID and media. Neither are helping him much.

The big problem for Hynes — his ads suck. The Hull and Obama ads are an order of magnitude better than Hynes.

My disclaimer–I like Dan Hynes. I think his work as a financial watchdog is great. That said, the campaign is maybe competent, but certainly not inspiring. If the organization can’t pull out a ton of votes, he’s toast. I have made a few passing references to SEIU in the last few days, but those three union endorsements are big deals and they are unions that go to work for you. The trades are helpful, but not what they used to be.

He does have Metro-East locked up–minus the black vote which will be delivered to Obama by the Jackson outreach machine. Chico has the Mayor of East St. Louis, but he can’t deliver votes in any number. The Central Committee delivers the votes and Carl only won by beating them at retail politics. They’ll go with the Jacksons and whatever walk-around money the can split between themselves. The rest of the black vote in Metro East isn’t much prettier other than some independent minded folks.

Going out from there, the electeds backing Hynes will deliver some votes, but the Hull organization should do well outside of Metro East simply by knowing who to get out. The divorce scandal is below the radar for the most part other than in Springfield. Hull’s ability to spend for a GOTV operation even if it is just calls should outpeform Hynes in areas not controlled by the Jerry Costello.

Overall, this just reinforces Obama’s position at the top and Hull pulling back into second. Hynes isn’t dead, but he has to thread the needle at this point.

Tribune/WGN Poll

Seeing a Trend

Democrats
Obama 33
Hynes 19
Hull 16
Pappas 8
Chico 6

Republicans
Jack! 32
Edelweis 11
McKenna 10
Undecided 35

The Chicago Tribune/WGN-TV poll is based on telephone interviews with 602 Democratic and 580 Republican voters likely to participate in the Illinois primary on March 16; the margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points. The poll was conducted March 3-6.

Hull bottomed out during this time, so expect some sort of gains for him. Hynes can’t seem to move from right around 20 and Pappas can only do better with commercials breaking. Chico is just the odd man out.

Jack! just can’t seem to break it open to finish everyone off with the high undecideds, but probably is high enough to win. Maybe I’m just engaging in wishful thinking for our democracy, but I have to think that while Rauschenberger won’t win, he’ll pick up a big chunk of late deciders and be the surprise on election day. Oberweis and McKenna have topped out.