Illinois Congressional Races

The Race to Replace Luis IL-4

May well include Luis Gutierrez (IL-4) himself. In March, Gutierrez confirmed he would retire from Congress at the end of this term touching off a scramble for the seat. One of the biggest questions is will he really retire. His initial desire to retire seemed to revolve around an interest in challenging Richard Daley for Mayor of Chicago. He chose not to run and he still seemed content to retire, but Laura Washington expresses many people’s opinions that he might not be ready to go, especially with immigration reform not completed.

While he would have faced no serious opposition if he had run again, deciding to get back in the race would be difficult. Already candidates have amassed fairly large war chests to take him on and he’s always been an anemic fundraiser to say the least. He also was delinquent in DCCC dues for some time during the 2006 cycle. He blamed poor fundraising on the nature of his district, but his would be successors are proving him wrong. He also has had some scandals pop up that raise several questions.

Already three announced candidates have raised nearly $1 million for the primary. Leading the pack is 1st Ward Alderman Manny Flores with $478,029 raised in the last quarter alone. Right behind him is 22nd Ward Alderman Rick Munoz with $310,706. And third is Cook County Commissioner Roberto Maldonado with $192,857.

Other likely candidates include 25th Ward Alderman Danny Solis, State Representative Susana Mendoza, and 12th Ward Alderman George Cardenas.

The question of electability isn’t a issue since the District is safely Democrat. In both 2000 and 2004 the District provided 79 percent of the votes for Gore and Kerry with a Cook Partisan Index of +31 D. No, that’s not a typo. The percentage of Hispanic origin is just under 75 percent though the voting population is a significantly lower percentage.
It’s safe to say the candidates are generally close on national political issues with the key differences residing along how close to Richard Daley and the Chicago Democratic Machine. Even including those who are Daley allies there are degrees of difference that provide an important understanding of how the race may play out.

Munoz and Flores have strong reputations as reformers having both defeated candidates backed by the Hispanic Democratic Organization (HDO). HDO is strongly aligned with Mayor Richard Daley and two leaders of the organization have been indicted by US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald for participating in patronage schemes throughout Chicago city government.

Of the two, Munoz is considered less likely to back large developments as an Alderman and less likely to compromise, while Flores has worked to provide several large developments in his Ward and willing to compromise and work with anyone to achieve legislation. Mostly, they are aligned with each other on most major issues including reform.

Close to having the same kind of anti-HDO credibility is Susana Mendoza, a State Representative who has fought with HDO every campaign. Her primary disadvantage is being a State Representative does not provide nearly the same base of support as being an Alderman.

Maldonado has run an independent course not being close to HDO, but also not having had to go to war with them. He’s been close to Gutierrez over the years and though he had some questions raised about patronage hires, he’s largely seen as clean if not as dynamic as the younger Munoz and Flores.

Solis has been considered Daley’s strongest Hispanic ally and was long backed by HDO, to have them switch their support in the 2007 election. Solis won and Daley supported him, but his ties to HDO were severed. He was one of the Alderman who defected from Daley and voted for the Big Box ordinance which required a higher wage to be paid by Big Box stores such as Walmart. After Daley vetoed the legislation, Solis switched his vote and helped Daley sustain the veto.

Four of the five candidates discussed have a reform pedigree with Munoz and Flores perceived as standouts for their progressive politics and grassroots campaigning. Maldonado has a lot of deep community ties and while he is more low key and has some ties to the regular machine, he’s respected by most everyone.

Solis is a machine candidate. Then there is George Cardenas who isn’t just a machine candidate, but a machine hack. He might not qualify as the worst hack tied to HDO, he is a perfect example of the typical hack. He also switched his vote on the Big Box bill after Daley’s veto and was challenged by the Chicago Federation of Labor for doing so.

Cardenas’ reelection campaign was not only strongly backed by HDO, but Cardenas employed Al Sanchez, who was indicted in March on corruption charges related to his leadership role in HDO.

Others may yet enter the race, but the danger is that with four decent to great candidates, the vote will be split providing Cardenas a victory, the worst possible outcome. The difficulty is for progressives and independents there are four decent candidates to choose from.

Of the four, the intangibles are hard to gauge. Mendoza is probably the weakest in terms of long term prospects of being a leader in Congress. Maldonado is quieter than Munoz or Flores, but also deeply tied to his community and a hard working representative. Maldonado is the type of candidate who gets ignored by those on the outside looking in, but has many of the traits the community may appreciate.

Flores and Munoz are the most dynamic and most likely to take on a leadership role for progressive causes in Congress. And there is the key difference–how will they do that? Munoz is far more likely to take strong stands and less likely to compromise. Flores is probably the best at reaching across diverse groups and finding compromises while still remaining progressive.

The Illinois Races

IL-3 Two challengers taking on Dan Lipinski in the Democratic Primary. No serious Republican 59 D 40 R (2004 Presidential vote in District)

IL-4 A multiway primary to replace Luis Gutierrez–more later. 79 D

IL-6 Roskam is a freshman and thus a likely target, but there aren’t any candidates right now since Duckworth announced she wouldn’t run in a rematch. 53 R 47 D

IL-8 Millionaire taking on Bean. Little reason to think he’ll be any stronger than McSweeney. 56 R 44 D

IL-10 Democratic Primary between two prolific fundraisers in Dan Seals and Jay Footlik. Winner takes on Kirk in a Democratic leaning District. 53 D 47 R

IL-11 No announced challenges to Weller in a fairly close district 53 R 46 D. This would be a shame to leave uncontested or undercontested.

IL-14 Three Dems seeking to run in what is likely to be an open seat. John Laesch ran last time. Bill Foster is a physicist who has promised to spend $1 million of his own and a third candidate. For the Republicans, Chris Lauzen, CPA has Jack Roeser’s backing, Uberweis is in and presumably garnering the Minutemen for battle, while Schmitz and Stokke are out. 55 R 45 D

IL-18 Open seat, more Republican than the other vulnerable Republican seats, but also a strong labor presence in the District. Two Republican State Reps including party favorite Aaron Schock are looking at the race. 58 R 42 D

Congressman “Dogged” by Constituents Who Want Him to Bring Troops Home and End War in Iraq

Americans Against Escalation in Iraq

http://www.IraqCampaign.org


Glenview – Eight fully-uniformed officers from the Glenview police department were on hand to protect Congressman Mark Kirk today when he visited a Humane Society event in the town’s Gateway Park. The officers joined multiple members of Kirk’s staff at “Pet Protection Day,” where local pet owners learned about local services, pet care issues and animal protection legislation.

Also at the event were seven local supporters of the Iraq Summer campaign, which has been calling on Congressman Kirk to take a stand against President Bush’s reckless Iraq war policies. The supporters – all residents of Kirk’s 10th District – were on hand to present Kirk with a “Report Card” on his Iraq voting record.

Congressman Kirk spoke to the group about current efforts in Congress to protect animals, and was honored for his legislative efforts on behalf of animal rights. After he finished speaking and posing for pictures with pets, the Congressman avoided questions about his votes on the war from constituents as he hurried to his car.

Members of the Glenview Police present at the park – including Chief William Fitzpatrick – refused to answer questions about why so many were needed for an event attended by about 50 people. Village President Kerry Cummings, who was also on hand, said that everyone was welcome at the event and highlighted the park’s key role in the Glenview community.

Today marks the second time in two weeks that Congressman Kirk has been pressed in person by his constituents to answer questions about his position on the Iraq war. Despite signs that he may break step with the President, Kirk again voted with Bush on a July 12th bill that would withdraw nearly all American troops from Iraq by next April.

“Why is Congressman Kirk willing to talk about protecting pet food but not our soldiers?” said Sharon Sanders of Northbrook. “We were a peaceful group that wanted nothing more than a straight answer from our Congressman. I was shocked that he called in that many police to a Humane Society event,” said Sanders.

More after the jump

Read More

Very Professionally Edited Video of Iraq Summer Campaign by Footlik Supporter

Not very honest

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/qEVilhoFdnI" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

The original video:

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/UEfGmOWqHqA" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

Iraq summer deserves credit for their video and they don’t support any particular candidate.  Incorporating it into the Footlik supporter video is obnoxious. Doing it without attribution is doubly wrong.

Now, the other thing is I’m getting a lot of feedback on Footlik’s position on the war and the line regarding Footlik’s position is that he’s for getting out, but not a public timetable.  Whatever that means—the problem being that if you have a Republican President after this term is up and you set up a situation like that, there is nothing to force withdrawal.  So either you have a timetable in law or you don’t get out.

Beyond that, many are describing Footlik’s early comments as being that he didn’t want a  firm timeline and he described himself as a Lieberman Democrat.  On top of that, Eric Krol has a different version of what was said to him earlier.

Seals has built up a lot of credibility in the District and did a good job according to nearly everyone who observed the race with DCCC and the grassroots on the same page, it takes a lot to demonstrate a strong reason to back another candidate.  In this case, the hair splitting on the war and such doesn’t seem to provide much of a reason for Footlik’s candidacy and looks like he’s simply running on ambition.

Concerned Kirk Has a Look-A-Like

Jay Footlik

Didn’t take long for 10th Congressional District Democrat Jay Footlik to alter his position on the Iraq war.

Last month, as he got into the race, I asked Footlik a couple questions about his position on the Iraq war, sure to be a key issue in the primary against Democrat Dan Seals. Here’s what I wrote:

  • On Iraq, Footlik said he doesn’t necessarily support a “hard and fast deadline” for withdrawal, but thinks Congress has to force President Bush to come up with “something close to a deadline.”

    To say Footlik was elusive on the war topic is a fair characterization.

    So I was somewhat surprised to see this news release just arrive in the ol’ inbox:

    “It’s time to end our involvement in Iraq,” Footlik is quoted as saying in the release.

    More from the release: Jay Footlik supports the proposals in Congress that call for American troops to be out of Iraq by the end of April 2008. Military leaders on the ground know what they need to do and how to get to that point — safely and responsibly. “The process of redeployment should, in my view, begin no later than 90 days from today,” declared Footlik.

    Looks like Footlik handed Seals his first ready-made issue, and candidates aren’t even circulating nominating petitions yet.

  • Haven’t we had enough of Concerned Kirk’s bloviations about being concerned about the war and then not voting like it.  Why do we need a Democratic candidate pulling the same routine?

    But What Are You Going To Do About It Mark? Concerned Kirk is Concerned

    Kirk criticized the Libby Commutation:

    There were detractors in the president’s own party, including north suburban Congressman Mark Kirk (R-Northbrook), who expressed his disappointment.

    “He was indicted by a grand jury and convicted beyond the shadow of a doubt by one of the best prosecutors in America, Patrick Fitzgerald, and didn’t have a single member of a 12-member jury stand up with him,” Kirk said. “At that point, if you’ve done the crime,” you should do the time.

    Are you going to have another meeting with the President where he ignores you and you do what he tells you to do, Mark?

    The message from the lawmakers was “we’re all with you now, but we have concerns about where we will be next year,” a House GOP leadership aide said.

    A GOP House aide told CNN that the meeting was a “proactive step” by the White House to meet with lawmakers who had reservations about Bush’s troop increase in Iraq to make sure they would not support a new Democratic proposal that would pay for the Iraq war in stages.

    The aide predicted that there will be “no defections” when the proposal comes up for a vote today.

    Bush said Wednesday that he would veto the bill.

    Expressing concerns doesn’t change anything.  Voting against the President might.  Concerned Kirk isn’t going to do anything on his own though

    Illinois: Seals Officially Kicks Off Second Try to Oust Kirk

    Roll Call

    http://www.rollcall.com/issues/52_144/atr/19061-1.html

    Roll Call
    Illinois: Seals Officially Kicks Off Second Try to Oust Kirk
    June 21, 2007

    On Wednesday Dan Seals (D) officially launched his bid for a rematch with Rep. Mark Kirk (R) in the 10th district.

    Seals, who captured 47 percent of the vote last year despite being a complete unknown, does not have the Democratic field to himself, however.

    Business consultant Jay Footlik (D) already said he would return to the area from Washington, D.C. — he grew up in Skokie, which is not in the 10th district, but has not lived in Illinois since high school — to run.

    Local Democrats had hoped to clear the field for Seals, who in the words of one party activist who did not want to be named, had “earned it,” but they could not dissuade Footlik from running.

    “I had a primary last time as well, and I’m a business person,” Seals said. “I’m used to competition and I welcome him to the race.”

    Seals does not hide his disappointment with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee but said this is a new cycle.

    “They didn’t really play much of a role in the last campaign, much to my chagrin, but this time they are paying close attention,” Seals said.
    Read More