ArchPundit

Keller on NYC Anti-Smoking Ordinances

Keller on NYC Anti-Smoking Ordinances

Bill Keller surprises me with a good column on Bloomberg’s efforts to outlaw smoking bars. As an later in life asthmatic, I find the argument that smoking is a liberty a bit hard to take. It is a choice that infringes on my ability to breath well. And thus I see fewer bands–and that is bad. Smoking is a choice that is fine as long as other’s choices don’t affect me. I may have the choice to avoid a bar, but why should I have to because other people can’t cope with their addiction?

How to Bring the Japanese

How to Bring the Japanese out of Economic Doldrums

Keep choosing to be uncompetitive in the clean car race. Guest blogger Eric Rauchway at Altercation makes the valuable point that by dragging our feet, Japan is moving ahead. Gregg Easterbrook has done some great work on how the US Government under both Clinton and Bush have created an incredibly inefficient program to supposedly encourage better gas mileage. The Bush continuation is missing from TNR Online (or I’m too stupid to find it). However, he has instituted the same mechanism for fuel cell cars.

J-Ry loses it Ummmm…what is

J-Ry loses it

Ummmm…what is the J-Ry campaign message? Everyone is unfair to me so elect me? Because I have yet to hear a coherent message. Blago isn’t the biggest prize ever, but he stays on message (as inane as that message may be–my name is not Ryan). J-Ry is running one of the worst campaigns this side of the ’86 Larouche debacle. Even Dawn Clark Netsch was coherent.

Another day of process and no message. Another day of not giving the voters a reason to vote for J-Ry.

Why would there be an

Why would there be an increase in registrations?

Comparing raw numbers often leads to embarrassing statements by people who don’t have any traing in research. One of the sillier examples can be found at Real Clear Politics today. Their argument is that because there is a big upswing in Democratic registrations there is a higher likelihood fraud is being committed because in similar years, rates didn’t increase that much.

One problem: this year is different. Democrats are actively trying to register people on the Reservations. One would expect that when one party increases registration efforts more than the other, the party putting out more effort will be more successful. The number increase is as expected given there is a new ‘treatment’.

Additionally, voter registration is only open for 3 MORE DAYS! The Real Clear site indicates that the number go through November, but the registration cut-off is Monday. We are near the end of registration!

Real Clear continues with

Are these registration numbers proof of vote fraud? Of course not. But with recent evidence from the ongoing investigation suggesting that in certain counties as many as 1 in 10 registrations are invalid, just based on the data I’ve collected there could be upwards of a thousand fraudulent registrations in South Dakota by election day. That, my friends, would be a serious case of vote fraud. – TB 6:09 pm

Thousands? 1 in 10 would be less than one-thousand, but very seriouss. However, are we really seeing an increase that means all 8900 are affected by 1 in 10 ballots with problems? No–the 1 in 10 number comes from one county with about 1000 registrations. And not all of those are necessarily bad as Talking Points Memo points out. So given that we know of three people defrauding both the State of South Dakota and the SD Dems, we may have a series of bad registrations linked to a bad incentive system, but little evidence that it is widespread or a conspiracy. And the state Democratic Party is trying to help out.

This is a problem, but it is hardly the scandal that indicates massive vote fraud. It appears to be a scandal of individuals trying to get paid extra by the registration. And the increase in numbers is hardly shocking given the efforts.