From Illinois Issues. Of course, the problem with the article isn’t that Illinois is paying for $24 million for IPAM services, it’s actually paying closer to $30 million.
And yeah, Roskam was on top of this one. So credit to him.
UPDATE: Pat Guinane wrote in below to point out the amendments were tacked on after his story. I was trying to be funny and make a joke, so no offense intended towards Pat who wrote a good story.
FYI: The amendments that pushed the contract past $30 million weren?t made public until after my story ran. The following month we published an update on the $5.75 million that was tacked on.
I totally agree with what you’re saying. I wish more people felt this way and took the time to express themselves. Keep up the great work.
Bert Linert
http://www.realestateillinoiscenter.com
This blog posting was of great use in learning new information and also in exchanging our views. Thank you.
Andrea Jasperson
http://www.realestateillinoiscenter.com