I think there is a simpler explanation. Everyone has built up Obama as a paragon of virtue that the second he acts like a politician they take him to task. Part of it is a sense of fairness where they want to criticize each candidate also. I don’t mind the questioning of Obama, it’s just a bit over the top given we are still looking at 3-4 debates. My view is the Obama campaign ought to turn it around and have a two hour debate tomorrow over transportation. Lipinski can prep Obama on the more arcane subjects. Proft and Pascoe can try and teach Keyes what the Dan Ryan and the Skyway are.
The obvious & key problem with more debates, and even a debate tomorrow on transportation, is that regardless of how Obama and Keyes ACTUALLY perform, a small minority of voters will witness this debate.
How will they form their opinion on the performance of the candidates? From the media! Particularly the news media. Which, in order to seem “non-partisan,” will at least attempt to treat Keyes as a legitimate candidate, and will turn it into a “he said/he said” discussion, and presto! Instant validity for the pretend candidate.
Or, as austinmayor has suggested, Keyes will say five hundred bizarre things and Obama will be insufficiently strong on a relatively obscure question and the right wing attack machine will PUMMEL the real candidate. Which will then become the story.
It’s already bizarre that they feel comfortable attacking Obama’s legislative record, while ignoring that NONE of their candidates, not Jack!, not Ditka, not Keyes, hell, not even Barthwell, has ANY kind of legislative record at ALL! It’s representative of anti-democratic leanings in the hopes of having empty suits who can and will unthinkingly end up voting for legislation that suits the needs of the lobbyists and party leaders.
(By the way, I think it’s fine to have fresh voices, new ideas, smart people from other fields enter politics. Democrats certainly do it all the time. But between Schwarzeneggar, Coors, Steve Largent, Tom Osborne, and too many others to count, the Republicans seem freakishly enamored with the whole “celebrity politician” thing. Particularly given their stated disgust for celebrities with actual, you know, opinions.)
The commentators are lobbying for more debates in order to have something to write about that does not require much thought, or, heaven forbid, research.
Keyes really doesn’t want to debate Obama 6 times unless each one is televised nationally live, in prime time, broadcast and cable. It’s just bluster, and everyone knows it.
In any case it would be practically 1 a week until the election! When would either of them have time to actually go out and meet voters, especially downstate? Or is this going to be just a media-only campaign? How many debates did Durbin/Durkin have?
In any case, Keyes could care less about meeting actual voters. Much easier just to blather on from his sudden pulpit about generalities — what he apparently insists is his strength.
State Fair coming up. Should be good fun
My guess is that asking for 6 debates is just the GOP’s way of keeping Obama in the state. If he can’t leave Illinois, he can’t campaign for Kerry or other Dem senate candidates. Keyes is a sacrifice bunt, plain and simple.
My view is, bring ’em on, as many debates as possible. Keyes is SO bizarre (read the Slate articles about the GOP primary debates in 1999/2000 ) that Obama will look by comparison 1) extremely moderate and 2) a much more normal human being.
I think jakester makes a very good point about how the media typically spins things, but Keyes is so barking mad even the media will have no choice but to focus on his self-evident insanity. Obama just needs to have a few good one-liners in his pocket to use (preferably ones that will set Keyes off–the angrier/nuttier he is, the better for Obama and dare I say the entire Democratic ticket).
I’ve seen nothing in recent days to change my position that Obama wins by 40 points. And the more debates they have, the bigger that number will get.
Obama’s proposed debate schedule.
Debate 1
Date: August 12, 2004
Location: Carbondale, IL
Topics: Jobs, education, and the economy
Debate 2
Date: August 16, 2004
Location: Alton, IL
Topics: Foreign policy and fighting terrorism
Debate 3
Date: September 8, 2004
Location: Quad Cities, IL
Topics: Health care, retirement security
Debate 4
Date: October date TBD by Sponsor and Campaigns
Location: Springfield, IL
Sponsor: Illinois Radio Network
Debate 5
Date: October 21, 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Sponsor: League of Women Voters (LWV)
Debate 6
Date: October 26, 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Sponsor: WTTW
Now, Obama could reasonably say it’s too late for #1 and #2, but now he’s saying it’s too late for #3 and #4 also?