2006

Coming to America

Rich isn’t the only one who can get annoyingly catchy tunes in your head, but the NRCC has sent out a flyer claiming that Tammy Duckworth wants to give illegal immigrants Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare.

Small problem, she supports the McCain-Kennedy bill that doesn’t do such a thing. Yeah, the McCain who just came in to the District for Roskam and talked about all the sacrifices our troops have given like losing limbs. And who thinks Grover Norquist is crooked though Grover has been backing Roskam for some time.

It’s Not that Curious

Rich is calling it curiouser and curiouser

It’s not very curious at this point,

Roskam billed the endorsement as a “great boost” to his campaign in the final days, but admitted he sat on the endorsement until a few days before Tuesday’s election to have “the biggest possible influence.”

World War II veteran Joe Buttice of Wood Dale was unable to explain much about the endorsement other than to say Roskam “supports a strong defense for our country but also he took care of our local veterans at the same time.”

Duckworth, who lost her legs when her helicopter was shot down over Iraq, said she never had a chance to apply for the endorsement and called it “sad and regrettable.” One suburban veteran and Duckworth supporter called it “despicable.”

“To be shunned by this organization is beyond my scope,” said Mike McConnell, a Vietnam veteran from Winfield who said he received the Purple Heart.

Roskam said the national endorsement was based on the recommendation by a few 6th District VFW leaders. The only one he named was Soden, a former head of the Illinois VFW who was appointed to fill out former Republican Senate President James “Pate” Philip’s term in 2003.

Buttice said Soden sits on the national VFW’s political action committee board but had surgery Friday and was unavailable.

Give him a hand folks, he’s here all week.

Local VFW Meet National VFW

Apparently, the locals didn’t know anything about the national’s plan to endorse Roskam.

The endorsement also caught Duckworth by surprise. Flanked by more than 20 veterans at a hastily called press conference, Duckworth said she was never contacted by the organization or asked to fill out a questionnaire, which typically happens when organizations decide who they want to endorse.

“I think it’s unfortunate they did this,” said Duckworth, a former Army Black Hawk helicopter pilot who lost both legs when her aircraft was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade.

Members of VFW posts within the district said at Duckworth’s news conference that their posts were never contacted by anyone about endorsing either candidate.

“He didn’t ask our post,” said Bill Bahr, a Vietnam-era veteran and quartermaster at a post in Bloomingdale.

Roskam said the endorsement came at the urging of area VFW members, but he said he did not know who in the group endorsed him or how many local veterans were involved.

Fascinating. The endorsement came from thin air apparently.

Besides the obvious issues of what the hell is the VFW doing not consulting both candidates or asking the locals, the sheer clumsiness is hysterical.

h/t Rich

Oops

VFW endorsed Roskam. A while ago.

Roskam tried to bill the endorsement as a major boost to his campaign in the final days, but found himself admitting he sat on the endorsement until the end for maximum attention. The VFW representative was unable to give much of a reason for the endorsement or explain how it happened, and Roskam looked stunned at the harsh questioning from reporters.

H/T Rich

Wow. Cubed.

Final Rothenburg Predictions:

he latest Rothenberg Political Report ratings are out. Here are exclusive excerpts provided to Political Wire:

The Senate: “While Senate control is in doubt, with Democrats most likely to win from 5 to 7 seats, we do not think the two sides have an equal chance of winning a majority in the Senate. Instead, we believe that state and national dynamics favor Democrats netting six seats and winning control of the United States Senate.”

The House: “Going into the final days before the 2006 midterm elections, we believe the most likely outcome in the House of Representatives is a Democratic gain of 34 to 40 seats, with slightly larger gains not impossible. This would put Democrats at between 237 and 243 seats, if not a handful more, giving them a majority in the next House that is slightly larger than the one the Republicans currently hold. If these numbers are generally correct, we would expect a period of GOP finger-pointing and self-flagellation after the elections, followed by a considerable number of Republican House retirements over the next two years.”

Governors: “With Republican seats like Idaho, Alaska, and Nevada in play for state-specific reasons, and Minnesota vulnerable to a Democratic wave, the ceiling for possible Democratic gains is high. We have narrowed our earlier projection from Democratic gains of 6-10 to 7-9.”

Wow.

Democracy Corps has a new poll out:

It is very hard to look at the most recent Democracy Corps survey in the 50 most competitive Republican-held districts finished last night and not conclude that we are headed toward a 1994 election – with the Democratic majority approaching that of the ‘Gingrich Congress’. The named Democratic vote for Congress has moved up from a 3-point lead to 7-point margin since Sunday, with the named Democrat for the first time moving over 50 percent (51 to 44 percent). For the first time, the Democratic candidate is ahead on average in the bottom tier of least competitive races. The generic congressional ballot has moved up to 11 points – up 3 points from Sunday and another 3 points from the week before.

The gap in interest in the election (those ranking their interest as “10” on 1-to-10 point scale) between Democratic and Republican voters has grown from 7 to 14 this week.

The trend in the final week on most factors, as we will elaborate below, favors the Democrats, including independents’ support, enthusiasm, and handling key issues, including taxes, and above all, the Iraq war. The 2006 election is rapidly moving toward being a referendum on Iraq.

We do want to underscore in this last survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for Democracy Corps some reasons why you should believe this is real:

  • This survey, unlike any other public survey, asks the congressional vote using the actual names of each candidate, meaning this survey fully reflects any advantages for incumbency. We also ask the generic ballot for a read of overall partisan sentiment, but named vote is more likely to tell us what happens.
  • This survey is based on a 1,200 sample of likely voters conducted over three nights in the real battleground districts and will likely provide a more reliable read on the state of the race in the battleground.
  • This survey was not conducted on Halloween, which is a notoriously inaccurate night for polling.
  • The survey asks job approval and the thermometer rating for the incumbent by name, which produces a very disturbing result for the Republicans. Both measures are net negative, despite the power of incumbency. Incumbent approval is only 43 percent, with more disapproving, and indeed only at 44 percent in the tier 3 races.
  • While the survey shows a shift to the Democrats in the congressional ballot (named and generic) this week, the respondents have not shifted a point on party affiliation or recall of their 2004 vote. That should emphasize that this is a real, rather than a too-Democratic, sample.
  • These voters identify with the Republicans by 2 points, but in the generic, want to vote Democratic for Congress by 11 points.
  • We conducted 400 interviews last night after two news cycles of Kerry stories. While the story clearly broke through – over 20 percent of respondents in an open-ended question on what is happening in the campaign mentioned him – the story has not helped Republicans, and the calling on the last night was no different than the results from the first two nights. It is the highest recall for the partisans, those identifying as Democrats or Republicans, yet independents show no interest in it.
  • The shifts in this final week are almost entirely among independents who are giving the Democratic candidates landslide margins.