September 2006

Stunning Lack of Competence

There are a couple choices today given the Auditor General’s findings, but the absolutely FEMA like organization of the CPA is stunning.

The Death of Policy

One former CPA employee who had an office near O’Beirne’s wrote an e-mail to a friend describing the recruitment process: “I watched r?sum?s of immensely talented individuals who had sought out CPA to help the country thrown in the trash because their adherence to ‘the President’s vision for Iraq’ (a frequently heard phrase at CPA) was ‘uncertain.’ I saw senior civil servants from agencies like Treasury, Energy . . . and Commerce denied advisory positions in Baghdad that were instead handed to prominent RNC (Republican National Committee) contributors.”

We’ve seen it at Treasury with Paul O’Neil. We’ve seen it with Faith Based Initiatives with DiIulio . We’ve seen it at FEMA. We’ve seen it with Zoellick. We saw it at the CIA.

Yet, we get the Whitehouse and personnel treated as serious people. Why?

Bring the Senate Into the 21st Century

Having talked to many campaign workers, the bill not only would increase accountability, but it also would make their jobs far easier and I’m betting far more accurate. A friend is currently the compliance officer for Claire and trying to get the reports out is a nightmare–so go here and read about a bipartisan bill to improve the situation and get the Senate to disclose online–for comparison, Illinois’ campaign finance laws are far better than what relates to the US Senate in terms of disclosure.

Campaign Finance Dilemma: How Do You Put Down Social Security Privatization Support by Your Opponent as In Kind

Really, how do you thank the President, the Treasury Secretary, the Chair of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Social Security, The House Majority Leader, and the President’s OMB Office for promising to continue pushing a proposal that is deeply unpopular with independent voters?

Of course, the Bamboozlement over the issue continues as many in the press seem to think that a program that affects every American is not a big issue to worry about and Illinois Republican candidates for Congress try like hell to avoid the issue.

But, if the press does it’s job, Roskam and McSweeney have made their positions clear in his responses to the National Taxpayer Union’s candidate questionaire.

Both answer yes to the following question:

SOCIAL SECURITY CHOICE. I recognize that Social Security will default on its obligations to future retirees unless fundamental reforms are made. Therefore, I will work and vote for a system of Social Security Choice that will allow younger workers to have the choice of investing much of their Social Security taxes in regulated individual retirement accounts. Current retirees and those nearing retirement would not have any change in their Social Security benefits. Social Security Choice will give younger workers the option of ownership of personal Social Security accounts, with higher rates of return and better benefits than are possible under the current system.

That is a perfect description of the CATO plan which is essentially the outlines of the President’s plan that wasn’t a plan.

Making matters even more interesting is Roskam’s response to AARP

Without a doubt, Social Security must be protected. At the same time, I believe Social Security must be strengthened so that it can pay retirement benefits for years and years to come. Although no current or near retiree is facing benefit cuts, the benefits for future generations are at risk simply because the number of retirees continues to grow relative to the number of available workers who pay into the system. Therefore, I believe we should look at ways to improve the overall retirement security for all of us. If I am fortunate to serve you in Washington, I will examine all the proposals that are on the table. My position is that we must find a way to strengthen and protect Social Security without raising payroll taxes, without reducing benefits, without raising the retirement age and without privatizing the system.

What’s great is this sentence:

Although no current or near retiree is facing benefit cuts, the benefits for future generations are at risk simply because the number of retirees continues to grow relative to the number of available workers who pay into the system

This has always been true since the inception of the system. It does create challenges, but it certainly doesn’t require this kind of reduction in benefits.

Bush in Survey USA

First, if you want a good analysis of his national numbers there is only one place to go anymore and that is Charles Franklin’s Political Arithmetik. Charles actually does this work as a working political scientist and views it as a professional question, not as someone with a partisan angle. And he’s really, really good.

Bush has bounced up to around 40%, though that’s not exactly something to be excited about.

What’s interesting is the effect in Illinois. While he’s moved up from the mid-30s nationally and a little lower, his Illinois numbers are pretty much stagnant according to this month’s Survey USA poll which puts him at 31% approval. Both the national unweighted and weighted come close to Charles’ trend line so that is consistent with other polling. Bush has jumped between 28 and 33 percent approval for several months.

The local effect is that any movement upwards for Bush is unlikely to be helpful to the Illinois GOP where Bush is just toxic.

One Last Thing

As one of the biggest fans of David Simon’s work and all dramas Baltimore, I’m a little peeved I’ve been overlooked for a blogad from The Wire. Having seen the first two episodes, it’s off to another fine season as the Best Damn Show on Television since Homicide (this was a common phrase from Homicide fans during its tenure). And even better news, it’s been renewed for a fifth and final season.

If you haven’t watched the previous seasons, pick them up at your local DVD rental store and enjoy.