I have a big problem with the Danish Committee for Scientific Dishonesty, but not the problem most people have. Lomborg’s book isn’t science so why be concerned with it? I’m confused about how Cambridge had it peer reviewed actually–unless it was by someone not in the hard sciences. There is no scientific research in the book from what I’ve seen.

A good gig for you, if you can get it like Lomborg did.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *