I’m listening to John Fund whine that most young people don’t vote so the Daily Show’s demographics don’t matter.
Let me bother everyone with a fairly basic observation from likely voter theory 101.
The folks who are ‘younger’ sort or like the bloggers are ‘young’ (for example Markos and I are 35) aren’t much different from most voters in that those who seek out information about politics are more likely to vote–hence seeking out such information. If you can follow the Daily Show that is relatively high level political discourse–probably higher than most CNN/MSNBC/Fox shows–then one tuning in is likely to be more lilely to vote and the challenge for candidates or opinion shapers who appear is to boost turnout or turn the occasional swing voter watching to them.
IOW, appearing on the show if far from irrational. Appearing is very rational because it attracts those likely voters amongst hard to reach groups.
Doh…pundit whining will not stop, but perhaps making fun of them may increase now.
It could be you are both right. I know from the past that polls existed showing that people who got their news from Carson et. al. didn’t vote in that high of numbers. John, very likely, is coming from there.
But, when we widen our measure to political participation the Daily Show viewer is important and shouldn’t be ignored.
People politically participate in myriad ways and the way people participate change over time. The Daily Show could very well be one of those ways…
Oh Shit, I think I just channeled with Robert Putnam or something…
==Oh Shit, I think I just channeled with Robert Putnam or something…
No, Putnam thinks TV is evil. He’s also a condescending ass. Go figure. But good points.
Dear Pundit,
I’d love to discuss this matter with you over the phone.
You can contact me at:
(206) 888-9245
Talk to you soon,
Colonel Angus