Hysterical:
Get this out to everyone on your personal email list. Here’s what happened, including questions from Illinois Congressman Don Manzullo (R-16) of Barack Obama’s close advisor and Fannie Mae former CEO Franklin Raines per C-SPAN’s objective eye and ear.
Even if you take the case at the worst, calling Raines a close advisor is a lie. The entire statement he made was that:
The commercial’s main charge is based on an April story in The Washington Post that said Raines has “taken calls from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters.” Reporter Anita Huslin says Raines told her that during an in-person interview.
Now, compare that to having a campaign manager on the Freddie Mac dole through August, it appears that Illinois Review is descending into self-parody. Again.
But let’s, again, clarify where the Fannie and Freddie problems come from:
As of April, Sanders said, the rate of serious delinquencies on loans held by Freddie Mac was 0.81 percent. Fannie Mae’s rate of serious delinquencies was 1.15 percent. Those rates compare to market-wide rates of serious delinquency of 1.47 percent for prime mortgages, 8.35 percent for Alt-A mortgages, and 20.74 percent for subprime mortgages.
Fannie Mae and the smaller Freddie Mac either own or guarantee nearly half the entire market of U.S. home loans. The companies purchase mortgages from lenders, keep some for their own investment portfolio, and resell some to Wall Street investors as collateralized debt obligations or asset-/mortgage-backed securities.
“It is clear that Fannie and Freddie are the remaining source of stability and prudent underwriting practices among financial intermediaries,” Sanders said. “It is their willingness to continue to purchase conforming loans that is keeping the U.S. housing market afloat.”
Finance Professor Herbert Kaufman holds the same view. “Fannie and Freddie haven’t been involved in subprime mortgages — those with all the defaults, the real source of the market crisis. Fannie and Freddie, instead, have mainly bought prime mortgages, with strong credit standards and fairly strict lending requirements. Even in this bad mortgage market, the default rate on those prime mortgages is reasonable based on historical precedent.
Fannie and Freddie made good loans. However, they bought bad MBSs to make more money and that’s where the instability comes from. It’s fair to say they should be regulated more-in fact, requiring all mortgage lenders to meet the same or similar levels of regulation as banks would have greatly limited this entire fiasco–but, you know, regulation is bad….
The way to solve the problem is to return Fannie and Freddie to their initial state and take away the perverse incentives created by being privately held.