Isn’t Carville Transparent?

0 thoughts on “Isn’t Carville Transparent?”
  1. Carville is a hack, nothing more. You’re right, this is completely transparent. Rahm will go for it, too. He’s all for Hillary.

  2. Carville was a winner and he’s still got some great ideas.
    Let’s not turn on people who have actually won presidential elections.

  3. Then let’s not turn on people who are doing a good job running the party.

    Carville is backing Hillary and he’s trying to oust Dean to give her a leg up. It’s lame and it’s counterproductive and it’s horrible for the party.

  4. C’mon, James is smarter than that. If Dean is going to run he needs to step down anyway — so replacing him would free him up to run and energize his base. And I doubt he will run. He’s teed up for whatever cabinet position he wants, if not VP. I’d like to see an MD tackle health care and HHS.

    A departure from your usually sound insights.

  5. Sorry, I took “he’s burying his candidate” to mean he’s intentionally burying his candidate. By your comments, you obviously don’t mean that.

  6. Sorry—I wasn’t clear–it was a quick post and it made perfectly good sense in my head. Unfortunately, only I have access to the context in there. Well, me and the other voices.

  7. I’m also

    A) Fat
    B) Misogynistic
    C) a religious bigot
    D) Gay
    E) some other stuff I lost count of.

    But saying someone is bitter is really mean.

    And while that was a complete waste of time, thanks for sticking up for me.

  8. Hey, no problem. You’re right that it was a waste of time, because I was arguing against Helen’s sockpuppets, or maybe her real-life cousins or bingo friends or something. None of those people comment on ACC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *