Uncategorized

An Interesting Article in Harper’s

Though I haven’t read it yet and Harper’s isn’t full text The Washington Post gives a decent overview

Too often Americans buy into really easy stereotypes of who we are fighting in various conflicts. Part of this is the lack of attention spans by individuals and part is by the press so a good take on who is actually fighting can do a lot to explain incredibly complex situations. Some people we fight are violent Islamicists. Some are opportunists and some are simply patriots who think American forces won’t be benevolent in the long run. Each of these three are different challenges. One you defeat, one you jail, and the other you demonstrate your values to.

The sad irony is contained at the end of the first page:

Last November, Mohammed was arrested by American troops and sent to the now-notorious Abu Ghraib prison. But Abu Ali has fared better: He was hired to do contracting work for the occupation government and used his profits to support the resistance. This means, Graham notes, that “the American taxpayer was funding both sides of the conflict.”

What strikes me most about this is that we went in unprepared to deal with this sort of situation. Idiots like Perle suggested the Iraqi people would celebrate and be ready for full sovereignty right way almost, while realists such as Dick Lugar suggested a broader coalition and preparing the population for a long war.

Instead of understanding how complex this situation was, the civilians in the Pentagon sold this war on the cheap and full of hubris. The uniformed leaders suggested more troops. The civilians balked and suggested a new way. And now we know they wanted a way around the international law–or to put more plainly, the law of the land given the United States is a signatory to the Geneva Conventions and treaties approved by the Senate are just that.

Well that new way is failing. War is never simple and there was no chance this would be a World War II that was straightforward (though not easy). We face multiple problems in Iraq, but the Secretary of Defense would like to make you think the problems are simply evil incarnate in a few places. Some of our foes are evil–others need to be shown what being American means. Instead of trusting Americans to understand the need for a prolonged effort, Pentagon civilians sold a lie that the problems were isolated and not a big deal. They were wrong and now there must be accountability at the top. Fire Rumsfeld.

Bush Still Not on the Ballot

I can think of worse things for the Illinois Republicans. Namely both Bush and Ryan being off the ballot or essentially dead, but that is about it. There is currently a fight over the legislation. One bill that would have expanded state locations for voter registration and lessened the time to register was never brought up in the Senate–see DJWinfo for the details.

The Leader is making up their version of reality again:

The RNC chose to have their convention the first week of September, navigating around the Olympics and Democratic National Convention.

This is,to put it mildly, BS.

The Democrats originally set their date for July 18th. Then the Republicans set the date of August 29th – September 2nd. Then the Democrats moved their date back to July 26th. The Republicans would have had three weeks in that period to schedule the convention before the beginning of the Olympics.

Why? Trying to get advantage from September 11th. Nice. It’ll backfire too.

Bush should get on the ballot, but the fair thing would be to allow other parties to get on the ballot in an easier manner. That won’t affect Dems, but see if the Republicans will vote for a bill that is fair.

Of course, if you take Tom Roeser’s argument seriously, the Republicans could end up with neither a Presidential Candidate nor a Senate candidate on the ballot. Given there is no manner for replacement if the Ryan campaign does fall and the judiciary isn’t friendly, the Republicans have a real problem.

I doubt they are too worried about either campaign–both seem pretty much doomed to many at this point. But having no one at the top of the ballot makes it even harder to get the base out to vote. And this year has a feel of it of Republicans needing every last vote. The Democratic base is energized and angry and to get them out to vote against George Bush isn’t going to take much–even if he isn’t on the ballot. In addition, the base is especially excited about the Senate Candidate-Barack Obama. He’s a rock star in politics. Look at the press fawning over him (I do too).

Republicans have a President who is unpopular in Illinois, a Senate Candidate who can’t seem to shoot straight and several swing seats they’d like to pick up. But if the leaners don’t show up because they are discouraged with the chances of the President and the Senate Candidate, the Lege races will be very tough as will the Crane and Weller races. A party needs some excitement to turn out its base–not the people who will crawl over broken glass, but the voters who are generally Republican, but not activists. The Republicans are in danger of having no motivation to those folks destroying their chance at down ballot races and perhaps giving the Dems a few shots at taking more seats.

Lots can happen, but this could develop into the worst case scenario for Republicans.

All that said, some of the Republicans are doing a hell of a job organizing including the Join Cross guys. But generating that kind of excitement from below is tough. Very tough.

The Weekly Joyce

Is especially bad this week.

For one she claims that Lane Evans is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. This comes from his last opponent who claimed that Evans was a member of DSA when actually Evans is a member of the Progressive Caucuse in Congress which was posted on the DSA web site. But facts, schmacks. She makes the same claim about Danny Davis–I don’t know if that is true, but he does have ties to the Right Reverend Loon–errr… Moon and was there when Moon declared himself the Messiah.

Before she gets to that lie, she has an incoherent rant on the National Debt though she confuses deficit and debt in a rather bizarre way. But most importantly she doesn’t even begin to grasp how debt is financed by a large country. She seems to think collateral is needed when the reason people borrow from the US government is because it is a solid stable institution with a huge economy. You don’t put up collateral on national debt.

In a rather amusing bit she suggests the Terra is a tool to take away land and somehow this is connected to the above:

Are we now using every control mechanism we can to take the terra from the people? I don?t know. I?m just throwing out a few thoughts and it is up to you to see if the pieces fit.

So now the Leader has a bizarre conspiracy theorist writing for them who doesn’t get their facts even close to straight. Impressive way to build credibility. Again, as comedy, keep it up, but if the Leader wants to be anything more than ideological hacks they might try and find someone who isn’t a nutcase to write environmental columns for them.