Illinois Review continues with it’s absurd claims about Rahm Emanuel’s property taxes. What’s especially beautiful is this:
We subsequently had the Cook County Assessor’s Office’s answers verified. And while most of the experts we spoke with said that the assessment system in Chicago doesn’t pass the smell test, they did say that it is “seems possible” that the Assessor’s Office’s answers are accurate.
Seems possible? Ummm…the answers for the Assessor’s Office would make complete sense to anyone who has spent over 10 hours looking through property records. It’s incredibly standard stuff and someone who thinks it seems possible isn’t an expert.
But it gets better—Progress Illinois gets the actual tax bill:
What does all this get from Illinois Review:
Indeed, the thuggery of the Left and their political masters here in Illinois has been on full display. It is a Chicago-style that will soon be exported to Washington, D.C.
That said, Illinois Review is not going to stop asking questions. Nor will we mimic the Left, whose propaganda machines never allow facts to get in the way of their lies. When our questions are answered and those answers verified, we let our readers know.
Let’s make this clear. Illinois Review put up a story that was factually incorrect. It was, in fact, Illinois Review that screwed up in this case and is now lashing out at everyone else for pointing that out. If it was an honest mistake, the simple answer would have easy for them to simply say, “Our bad.” But no. We have several posts about how it’s so unfair for people to point out that they got a story entirely wrong.
You make a mistake–you own up to it. It isn’t fun, but it’s what you do. Illinois Review cannot do that.
Here’s their response:
POSTSCRIPT: We were emailed this morning by the Cook County Assessor’s Office, and cited court cases among other things. We needn’t say more. The previous posts which questioned Mr. Emanuel’s taxes have been removed. As a volunteer blog we are not able to stand alone.
I would love to hear what they would be standing alone for–I mean, the entire story was wrong, what is there to stand up for–defaming a public figure and refusing to correct it despite the evidence?