ArchPundit

The problem of funding higher

The problem of funding higher education

Light posting–not no posting. Today’s P-D has a good editorial on higher education spending. The problem with Hancock that I didn’t address specifically is that it doesn’t allow for costs that increase faster than the typical rate of inflation. Hancock is essentially set at inflation + some to make room for necessary changes. The problem is some areas go up much faster than inflation and the Hancock caps. Education and health care, two of the areas most supported by the public, are both increasing costs at faster rates than inflation or the Hancock limit.

Higher ed has to get control of its costs, but even given that occurring, spending still needs to be ‘caught up.’ Hancock limits our ability to do so. To provide educational opportunities in the form of student aid, the State of Missouri would have to bump up spending. Doing so in one lump would run into Hancock limits and severely limit other funds.

Higher ed is the easier issue. The real problem with Hancock will come from the effects of rising health care costs which have the ability to bankrupt some states. Hancock is an aggravating factor in this case, not the prime cause.

Inane Blogger Tizzy Katz continues

Inane Blogger Tizzy

Katz continues his insistence that the shootings are terrorist related. He claims the targeting of schools is part of the plan, but fails to make a coherent argument why one shooting at a school fits the targeting of schools.

Then he tries to tie in the anthrax letters. Next you know he’ll be tying in Oklahoma City. In fact, if this does turn out to be your typical homegrown fruitcake, I’ll predict that he and others will try and tie to them to Iraq and al Qaeda.

I mean it this time

I mean it this time

Light blogging for at least the early part of the week. Laptop is acting up and I am busy at work. Anyone know how to swap out HP Laptop fan?

Check out the stuff on Talking Points Memo for a good laugh on the Forrester situation. And when they catch the guy in Maryland–watch the wingnuts either ignore it or say he was framed if it isn’t an Arab. And above all–no retractions. If it is an Arab with actual ties–I’ll post a retraction for a week straight!

Avoiding Middle Eastern Description? Now

Avoiding Middle Eastern Description?

Now Instapundit is noting how hard everyone is trying to avoid the description of the assailants in the DC Burbs as Middle Eastern. Why would that be? Maybe because the witnesses aren’t claiming to have seen Middle Eastern men and Instapud and pals are trying to pin everything they can on Arabs.

And what the hell does Middle Eastern look like anyway?

Another interesting note on how bad Instapud wants this to be an Arab is his pointing out the Hispanic article which was posted early in the morning on the 4th while up above he mentions the specific subject being looked for today. Why would a 36 hour old news story be more reliable than the 2 hour old news story. Because he wants it to be an Arab?

Calling the DNC, Calling the

Calling the DNC, Calling the DNC

Tom Friedman identifies the the real problem with the Democrats. The Democrats seem paralyzed in fear of a man who couldn’t win the plurality of votes in the Presidential race. Instead of being against his energy plan, why not present an alternative that shows how beholden he is to energy interests. Why not make the case for multilateralism? Why not make the case for fiscal responsibility?