ArchPundit

Blogrolls and Stuff

As many of you know Atrios, Markos, and The General all redid their blogrolls and I was eliminated from all three. I kind of expected it and I’m fine with it-Markos says it best with the following:

To me, that’s a slap in the face of every new blog that was added. Rather than celebrate the fact that a whole new generation of blogs gets a little recognition, some (and that doesn’t include most bloggers pulled from the blogroll) apparently had a bizarre sense of entitlement. Everything in a blog is in constant motion. Nothing is static. That’s the beauty of the medium. And now the blogroll will reflect that spirit — constantly evolving as the blogosphere itself changes.

It’s a good thing when blogrolls change–there will be some great new sites to discover.

Hysterical

Urquhart Media Honors Life & Times of Francis Urquhart

Chicago, Illinois… Urquhart Media, LLC today honors the life and times of our company’s namesake, Francis Urquhart, with the untimely passing of accomplished actor Sir Ian Richardson on Friday. In memory of Sir Ian Richardson/Francis Urquhart, a black armband has been affixed to the Urquhart Media logo on our company website, www.urqmedia.com.

In the history of the world’s politics, there was no finer practitioner of the art of politics than Francis Urquhart, the late Prime Minister of Britain.

What’s that, you say? There never has been a Prime Minister of Britain named Urquhart — Francis or otherwise? You’re quite right, of course. We’re referring to the fictional lead character of House of Cards, a BBC-produced political satire about the post-Thatcher succession struggle inside Britain’s Conservative Party.

Do we endorse the diabolical schemes and Hobbesian sensibility of Francis Urquhart? In honor of his passing, we must say, “You might think that. We couldn’t possibly comment.”
Ian Richardson: 1934 – 2007

British actor gained fame in `House of Cards’
Evil politician in satirical television series became signature role during long career on stage and screen

Associated Press

LONDON — Ian Richardson, who brought Shakespearean depth to his portrayal of a thoroughly immoral politician in the hugely popular satirical television drama “House of Cards,” died Friday at age 72, his agent said.

In addition to his many stage, screen and TV roles, Mr. Richardson also appeared in one of the mustard commercials as the man in the Rolls-Royce who asked, “Pardon me, would you have any Grey Poupon?”

He died in his sleep at his London home, said the agent, Jean Diamond.

Mr. Richardson played the silkily evil Francis Urquhart in three mini-series, “House of Cards” in 1990, “To Play the King” in 1993 and “The Final Cut” in 1995.

Urquhart’s smooth riposte to any slur against another character–“You may think that; I couldn’t possibly comment”–was picked up by British politicians and heard again and again in the House of Commons.

His other television roles included Bill Haydon in John Le Carre’s “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy”; Sir Godber Evans in “Porterhouse Blue” and Sherlock Holmes in “The Hound of the Baskervilles.”

In 2000, he starred in “Murder Rooms: The Dark Beginnings of Sherlock Holmes,” playing Dr. Joseph Bell, the mentor of Arthur Conan Doyle, in a mini-series that was broadcast in the United States on PBS’ “Mystery.”

He also portrayed the British spy Anthony Blunt in the British Broadcasting Corp. television play “Blunt.”

On Broadway, he played Jean-Paul Marat in “Marat/Sade” in 1965, reprising the role on film the following year, and Henry Higgins in a 1976 revival of “My Fair Lady,” for which he was nominated for a Tony Award as best actor in a musical.

Other movie credits included “Brazil” in 1985, “The Fourth Protocol” in 1987 and “102 Dalmatians” in 2000.

But it was his “House of Cards” role that turned him “from a jobbing actor that the cognoscenti were aware of into a star that the country’s entire viewing population knew,” Richardson said in an interview last year.

“House of Cards” was brilliantly, if accidentally, timed. It appeared in Britain in the same year that Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was brought down by feuding in her Conservative Party.

The mini-series was shown in the United States as part of PBS’ “Masterpiece Theatre.”

###

I like to poke fun at Proft, but this is really funny.

More First Person Springfield Coverage

Chris Hayes was there and covers the tension between being the grassroots guy and the on message national politician.

The great line of the article is this:

Part of this can be chalked up to a kind of punk-rock-band-gone-MTV disaffection. People who were into Obama when he was an underground, authentic phenomenon aren’t necessarily so into the slickly produced, more pop-friendly version.

Many who have been reading this blog since 2002 are familiar with this feeling. Okay, not many since not many read it in 2002.

I was interviewed by BBC 4 and then BBC Belfast over the weekend and trying to describe the speech was a little hard. I thought it was excellent by most standards of American politicians, but only decent for Obama.

I’m a bit more positive about what Obama is doing now than many of the early adopters, but I also understand the concerns and observations and Chris does one of the better jobs laying out the thought processes I’ve seen. I think there is something else going on in the rhetoric that Chris points out is in tension between unity and progress. I’ll cover that later, but it’s a good article so take a look.

Today’s Tosser

I’ve been thinking of how one could use a Debbie Does Dallas line to be funny. I came up with a few thoughts on it, such as if someone were discussing a sex education bill or something where one makes clear one is not talking about the individual’s behavior.
However, it’s definitely not funny in the context of talking about someone who has HPV and had a hysterectomy. Repeating it only makes it worse.

It’s fine to criticize the ideas someone has if they share a personal experience, but to imply they are a slut or a porn star in their behavior is over the line. Way over the line. 60 -70 % of the population contracts HPV in some form. Just on the issue of making a message persuasive, telling a majority of people they are dirty filthy people is unhelpful to the message.

How a single individual contracted HPV isn’t the point and trying to embarrass someone who shared an intensely personal part of their medical history only makes the person trying to embarrass her look like a sociopath. Or perhaps that’s just an accurate description of the person trying to embarrass the person with HPV.

What’s hysterical is this line from Stanek:

Back to those liberal bloggers. Their loud demand for ignorance can be interpreted only one of two ways. Either they hold a paternalistic view of women as being too weak to handle the truth or an exploitive view of women who should remain sex objects no matter the cost to their health. There is no other explanation for hysterical protests to shut up about the cause of HPV.

No one wants anyone to shut up about the causes of HPV. In fact, one can look at Debbie Halvorson’s record and see one that advocates comprehensive sex education which has demonstrated far more success in avoiding STDs than does abstinence only education that Stanek supports. Halvorson actually supports giving students age appropriate information to avoid infection instead of pushing a failed policy of abstinence only education. The only people trying to gag anyone in the discussion are those ignorant fools like Stanek who don’t care about evidence, but they are on a religious crusade to punish women who have sex.

Let’s recall what Stanek suggested:

* Halvorson could discuss the number of sex partners she has had throughout her lifetime and how each one increased the likelihood of contracting HPV.
* If Halvorson even had only one sex partner aside from her husband, she could discuss how one can contract HPV from a sole encounter.
* Halvorson could discuss whether she realized at the time her sex partner carried HPV, which most trusting, vulnerable women don’t.
* Halvorson could disclose whether it was her husband who passed HPV on to her after sleeping with other women, demonstrating another reason for chaste behavior outside the marriage bedroom.
* More uncomfortably, if Halvorson contracted HPV through rape, she could discuss ways to avoid rape.

But no, Halvorson does not advocate avoiding a risky behavior that leads not only to HPV but to 20+ other STDs and their strains, along with unplanned pregnancy. Halvorson merely advocates trying to avoid the consequences of risky behavior. Shame on her.

Halvorson does advocate avoiding risky behavior and when having sex to reduce the risks involved. That’s dealing with reality that people actually do have sex.

Stanek seems to think if you say just say no enough, people won’t have sex. That has never been true and it never will be true. People are sexual beings and that’s a good thing. Teaching young people how to have healthy relationships is how to best reduce risks across the board. Teaching them to just say no leads to the same level of sex just without the tools to avoid pregnancy and STDs.

Beyond that, even if people make poor decisions regarding sex, there is nothing wrong with reducing the risks of those poor decisions. Under Stanek’s standards seatbelts would only be encouraging teens to speed and therefore morally wrong.

There’s a history of being able to say anything in some conservative circles and not be shunned. Apparently that’s true at the Illinois Review.

Keyes’ Company: Alan Keyes Lives in Bill Kristol

There’s something about Obama that makes people opposed to him explode into a burst of hot gas with the most recent example being Bill Kristol (video on C & L):

KRISTOL: We’re electing a war president in 2008. If I can go back to Obama and Lincoln for just one second, Lincoln’s “house divided” speech in 1858 was a speech saying we cannot live as a house divided on slavery. And he implicitly says we’ll have to fight a civil war if necessary on this.

Obama’s speech is a “can’t we get along” speech — sort of the opposite of Lincoln. He would have been with Stephen Douglas in 1858. Let’s paper over these differences, rise above politics and all get along. That’s not Giuliani’s mode. And I think in a war context, social conservatives want to win the war against Islamic jihadism.

Last guy to say something this dumb: Alan Keyes:

So, have to give it to Keyes, when he says something most people would find embarrassing and over the top and is called on it, he doesn’t shrink from it. This morning on CNN when called on the Slaveholder line they showed him saying it and then they showed Obama responding. Obama responded slowly, surprised it was this wacky this quickly, and actually twitched and then said the bit about Keyes needing to look to Republican Party leaders about whether such language is appropriate.

Keyes then defended the quote and in effect reiterated it saying he doesn’t have to look to his party because he (Keyes), knows his heritage. He didn’t just embrace the quote, he grabbed on it and wrestled it to the ground.

Daily Dolt

The weekend produced a lot of candidates, but the winner is….

Australian PM John Howard:

n the same question-and-answer session with reporters, Obama had harsh words for Australian Prime Minister John Howard, who said Obama’s proposal to withdraw combat troops by March 2008 would “just encourage those who want to completely destabilize and destroy Iraq.”

Obama said Australia had sent only 1,400 troops to join the effort in Iraq, a fraction of the 140,000 U.S. troops there.

“I would suggest that he call up another 20,000 Australians and send them to Iraq,” Obama said. “Otherwise, it’s just a bunch of empty rhetoric.”

Yeah, Obama might actually get Osama bin Laden too.

Send me the video if you have it on You Tube or I’ll find it later.

Yeah, I was there

But when Rich says we had a communication break down, it wasn’t we–it was me. I was a bit late getting there and didn’t think to catch up with him. It was fun and cold and I wouldn’t have missed it.

Shomon’s party was a blast and I had a great time–glad to meet everyone I did.

I got home on Sunday (I was in Bloomington with my daughters later on Saturday) and my power was out. Again. Landlord problems. Anyway, blogging will be a bit slow until the power is back on and my new motherboard arrives (Newegg shipped within 24 hours of receiving the bad one–I highly recommend Newegg now).

Almost everything besides the announcement was just fun and so I don’t write about it, but I will say the act of introducing Kwame Raoul as the next Barack Obama to two Japanese reporters was an act of cruelty that has absolutely hysterical. For those who don’t get it–Senator Raoul replaced Obama in the 13th, but in translation this doesn’t come out the same way.

Oh, and e-mail is way behind, but I’ll be getting to it.